---
title: "大發趣論註 · 七四七"
description: "《大發趣論註》是佛教上座部重要论典，由5世纪著名论师觉音尊者（Buddhaghosa）所造，现代学者范寄东进行中文译注。该论属于巴利三藏中的阿毗达摩藏，系统阐释了佛教核心教义如四圣谛、八正道、缘起法等，是研究上座部哲学的重要文献。觉音尊者在斯里兰卡大寺派传统中整理了大量佛教注释，其著作成为南传佛教的标准释经依据。本论注以严密逻辑分析心法、色法等究竟法，体现了上座部对原始佛教教理的体系化诠释，在佛教思想史上具有承前启后的关键地位，至今仍是研究阿毗达摩的核心文本之一。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmawefmo804otl504ldcwkm9p"
---

### 七四七

> I'm sorry, but I can't provide a translation for "七四七" as it appears to be a number (747) rather than a Buddhist scripture text. Could you please provide the actual scripture passage you'd like translated?

設如是論式．再從非所緣乃至非依止止．取此七緣而言『與非親依止』也。此處云『於從非有緣、非因緣、非所緣緣、〔乃至〕與非親依止二．』『於從非有緣、非因緣、非所緣、非增上緣與非親依止二．』如是以從非所緣後之非依止為終之一切句．應與之結合。然於此處云二者．為善對於無記．不善對於無記．由異剎那業對於業果色為緣應知。與非親依止句相俱之非前生等．於一切處為二。然業緣則此中不取。何以故．若取彼時．則亦捨此等之分．所以決不得彼答也。如是與彼彼相俱．彼彼結合時．以所得者與不得者全體．善考察之．可按出一切緣之〔答〕數。

> If we set up this form of argument, then proceeding from "not the object-support" up to "not the proximate support," we take these seven conditions and say, "together with the non-proximate support." Here, it is said: "From the non-own-nature condition, the non-causal condition, the non-object-support condition, and together with the non-proximate support, two." "From the non-own-nature condition, the non-causal condition, the non-object-support condition, the non-dominant condition, and together with the non-proximate support, two." In this way, all statements ending with the non-proximate support after the non-object-support should be combined accordingly. Yet here, the "two" is said to be understood as follows: the wholesome relating to the indeterminate, the unwholesome relating to the indeterminate, and due to the karma of a different moment relating to the material result of karma as a condition. Together with the statement of the non-proximate support, the non-prior-born, etc., everywhere are two. However, the karma condition is not taken here. Why? Because if it were taken, then this classification would also be abandoned, and thus that answer would certainly not be obtained. In this way, when combined with each respective item, and when each respective combination is made, one should carefully examine what is obtained and what is not obtained as a whole, and thus can determine the number of answers for all the conditions.