迴僧物入己戒三十
Chapter 30: Misappropriating Sangha Offerings
而未分僧別二異者。以定許其僧而未分彼此之異也。十誦多論若檀越施此自恣僧物迴與彼者。問此若定屬之。物迴時即合犯夷。若不定屬物究竟合吉。何言不還方許成重邪。故知部別不同。未詳通意也。
As for the distinction between the monastic community and individual differences, it is because the community is definitely established, but the differences among its members are not specified. According to the *Ten Recitations* and *Great Commentary*, if a donor offers an item to this particular monastic community, and it is redirected to another, the question arises: if it is definitively assigned to the first, then at the moment of redirecting, it constitutes a serious offense. If it is not definitively assigned, the offense is only complete when the item is actually transferred. Why then is it said that the offense becomes serious only if the item is not returned? Thus, the variations among the different schools are many, and the intention behind this unified principle remains unclear.
律抄第三卷手決一卷
Vinaya Commentary, Volume 3, Hand Commentary