DonateZen HallLibrary
Skip to main content
  1. Sutra 466-A (No. 466-A)
  1. Vajra Treatise Commentary and Explanation (金剛疏科釋)
  2. Sutra 466-A (No. 466-A)
←&→
Use ← → arrow keys to turn pages

Vajra Treatise Commentary and Explanation (金剛疏科釋)

About 金剛疏科釋

Yuan · by 徐行善科

15,705 · about 52 min

Xu Xingshan's "Commentary on the Diamond Sutra with Structural Analysis" is a significant Yuan Dynasty commentary on Kumārajīva's translation of the Diamond Sutra. The author, Xu Xingshan, was a distinguished monk of the Huayan school during the Yuan period. Based on Huayan thought, he provided a structural analysis and exegesis of the Diamond Sutra. This work systematically organizes the scripture's structure through doctrinal classification, elucidates the Prajñā teaching of emptiness, and integrates the Tathāgatagarbha doctrine. Holding a pivotal position in Buddhist history, this commentary both inherits the exegetical traditions of the Tang and Song dynasties and reflects the syncretic trends of Yuan and Ming Buddhism. It is a key text for the study of the Diamond Sutra and the process of Buddhism's Sinicization, highly valued by scholars both within and outside the Buddhist community.


No. 466-A
(可明)謹以為法之心,修書上呈大居士。仰惟大教利生,唯般若空慧,可以導萬行,福羣生,祛惑累,臻極理。四處十有六會,咸彰此道。至摧萬有,蕩一無,金剛力最堅最利,故世人多持誦之。幽明顯應,不易悉數。翻譯有六經,申通有三論,隨機見別,仍有異同。至我天台大禪師,妙悟通經,作為此疏,以釋秦本。五代亂離,流之東海。諸師別有所述,皆依傍諸論,彌縫別譯,破碎不能貫通。此疏復還,反有以為偽者。樝菴嘗力辯焉,人始信受。愚頃於南湖觀室,伏讀此疏,喜不自勝。且曰:分實是方便二周,明不可思議十事。前後科判,自非大師,疇克若是?迴視諸家述作,雖共有弘通美意,莫能及也。有僧善義,勇化緣,遂尋訪別本,與之讐校,刊留南湖。後 毒皷甞建講,比以城居失火,燎其板,深為嗟惜。茲承下諭,知留意探討,欲入疏從經,以便看閱,誠殊勝事也。將以刊行,乃蒙示及,因得考其大略而評論焉。蓋欲傳遠以廣利四眾,是不可卒爾。謹別紙繕寫呈上,切祈詳覽。不宣。
(可明)謹白

No. 466-B

CBETA Code: X0466

© AI 帮你读佛经 - 如是我闻

This document is for personal learning only. Do not use for commercial purposes.

Visit rushiwowen.co

Copyright: Original texts from CBETA
AI translation for reference only — not authoritative, not a statement of final truth. Awakening of the Dharma requires personal practice.