---
title: "雲棲淨土彙語 · 淨土難信之法(三)"
description: "雲棲淨土彙語由清代虞執西和嚴培西共同錄編，成書於淨土宗興盛的清初時期。該書輯錄了蓮池大師（雲棲祩宏）的淨土法門開示、語錄及修行要義，集中闡述念佛往生、淨業三福等核心思想。作為淨土宗重要典籍，它系統傳承了雲棲大師的淨土教法，對清代淨土信仰的普及與實踐產生了深遠影響，是研究中國佛教淨土宗思想和修行的重要文獻。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmcywaqn606eelb04lrkzesmg"
---

### 淨土難信之法三

> The Difficult-to-Believe Dharma of the Pure Land <note>3</note>

華嚴第十。主藥神得念佛。滅一切眾生病解脫門。清涼疏。謂趣稱一佛。三昧。易成。敬一心濃。餘盡然矣。況心凝覺路。闇蹈大方者哉。前數語宏讚專念。後二句入理深談。誰謂淨土淺也。行願品廣陳不可說世界海。不可說佛菩薩功德。臨終乃不求生華。藏而求生極樂。誰謂淨土淺也。聖賢垂訓如是。而人自淺之。佛言難信之法。不其然乎。

> The tenth lord of the Medicine Gods attained liberation through the gateway of mindful recitation, which eradicates all sentient beings’ illnesses. Qingliang's Commentary explains: When one leans into calling upon a single Buddha, samadhi is easily realized. With single-minded reverence, all else naturally follows. How much more so when the mind settles on the path of awakening and traverses the great way in stillness? The preceding lines eloquently praise single-minded practice; the latter two lines offer profound insight into the underlying principle. Who can say that the Pure Land is shallow? In the Chapter on Samantabhadra's Vows, it is widely taught that within inconceivable world systems imbued with infinite Buddha and Bodhisattva virtues, at the end of life one does not pray to be reborn in the Flower Treasury but instead seeks rebirth in Ultimate Bliss. Who can say that the Pure Land is shallow? Thus the sages and worthy ones have passed down their teachings—yet people themselves belittle them. The Buddha spoke of this as the "difficult-to-believe teaching"—is it not so?