Support UsZen HallLibrary
Skip to main content
  1. Vimalakīrti Sūtra Commentary (維摩經義疏)
  2. Volume 5 (第五)
  3. Entering the Dharma Gate of Nonduality (Chapter Five) (9 入不二法門品(五))
←&→
Use ← → arrow keys to turn pages

Vimalakīrti Sūtra Commentary (維摩經義疏)


入不二法門品第九
一道清淨,故名不二。真極可軌,稱之為法。至妙虛通,謂之為門。了悟斯理,曰為入也。蓋是總眾教之旨歸、該群聖之淵符,淨名現病之本意、文殊問疾之所由。所以然者,由體不二之理故有不二之觀,由不二之觀故能適化無方,適化無方令歸斯趣。故《法華》云「究竟涅槃,常寂滅相,終歸於空。」空即不二理也,故六道之所憑栖、眾聖於茲冥會。問:不二既為理本,何不命初說之?答:經初已來所說諸法,為令悟不二,故是因教以通理。復欲藉斯不二起於二用,故有〈香積〉等品,即因理以設教。以在兩間說之,其得攝用歸體、從體起用,故不得命初說也。品開為二:初說入不二法門、次明悟不二法門。說不二法門為三:一淨名令眾人說、二眾人請文殊說、三文殊請淨名說。三門明不二者,《玄義》之內具以釋之。初諸菩薩俱泯於二、明乎不二,未辨不二之理無言。次文殊明不二之理無言,而猶言於不二。後淨名默顯不二之理無言,而能無言於不二。此示從淺至深三門階級,而所論不二之理更無淺深也。「爾時維摩詰謂眾菩薩言:諸仁者!云何菩薩入不二法門?各隨所樂說之」。所以淨名不自說而命眾人說者,上賓主問答以顯二人德竟,今復欲顯諸菩薩德故各令說也。又學者開心有地、受悟不同,或觀生滅以入真、或因有無而體寂,其塗雖殊、其會不異,故取眾人之所同,以證此經之大旨也。「會中有菩薩名法自在說言:諸仁者!生、滅為二。法本不生、今則無滅,得此無生法忍,是為入不二法門」。此第二受命而說。不生不滅者,可具三義:一者無性實生滅故云不生不滅,此世諦門無生滅也;二因緣生滅即是不生不滅,此真諦門無生滅也;三以世諦有故為生、真諦無故稱滅,非真非俗即是理實,名不生滅。今詳經意,明後門也。此非真俗為不二理,因悟斯理得不二觀名無生忍,稱之為入。「德守菩薩曰:我、我所為二。因有我故便有我所,若無有我則無我所,是為入不二法門」。我我所亦二:一計性實我我所,如外道等;二因緣假名我我所。今無此二種我我所,稱為不二門。「不眴菩薩曰」。不眴有三:一如天眼,天眼無眴。《涅槃經》云「乃至轉輪王,眼猶有眴,故與天帝為別」。二愛敬佛身,諦觀不眴。三心無塵垢,慧眼常開。「受、不受為二」。一約因說,凡夫取著名受,聖無取著名不受;二約果,有漏五陰名受,無漏名不受;三約九,不受餘二,如《毘曇》說。今就初門也。「若法不受則不可得,以不可得故,無取無捨、無作無行,是為入不二法門」。若法不受者,謂心無所受著也。本因受故有無受,既無有受亦無無受,故云亦不得也。向不見無受可取,今亦不見可捨,故云無取無捨。無取無捨故不作生死業,故云無作。無作故生死緣息,生死緣息正觀亦忘,故云無行。至此語來,有三轉意也。「德頂菩薩曰:垢、淨為二。見垢實性則無淨相、順於滅相,是為入不二法門。善宿菩薩曰:是動、是念為二。不動則無念,無念則無分別,通達此者,是名為入不二法門」。惑心微起名為動,取相深著名為念,始終為異取耳。今泯此二,名為不二。「善眼菩薩曰:一相、無相為二。若知一相即是無相,亦不取無相,入於平等,是為入不二法門」。一相為有法也,無相謂空法也。如柱為圓相,無圓名無相。又空為一相,空法亦無故云無相。今泯此二也。「妙臂菩薩曰:菩薩心、聲聞心為二。觀心相空如幻化者,無菩薩心、無聲聞心,是為入不二法門」。過去行施果報,手能出無盡寶物如四流河,名曰妙臂。或者謂聲聞心獨善、菩薩心兼濟,故今泯之,心本性空,未嘗大小。「弗沙菩薩曰:善、不善為二。若不起善、不善,入無相際而通達此者,是為入不二法門。」二十八宿內,鬼星名弗沙,生時所值,因以為名。十善為善,十不善為不善。若爾,凡夫起十善至佛皆為善,餘為不善,此攝法盡也。又順出世道為善,即三乘聖人;違出世名不善。凡夫三性皆為不善。又求小乘為不善、求大乘為善。又求小大二亦為不善,不二名善。今就初門說也。「師子菩薩曰:罪、福為二。若達罪性,則與福無異。以金剛慧決了此相無縛無解者,是為入不二法門」。罪福與善不善異者,體一義殊。損益為善惡、招報為罪福。罪福多據果,行善得富饒之果名福,造惡感罪折之報名罪也。金剛慧者,世間金剛若置山頂及以平地,直過無礙,到金剛際然後乃住。實相慧,置福山頂若罪平地,直過無礙,到於法性非罪福同性乃住。「師子意菩薩曰:有漏、無漏為二。若得諸法等,則不起漏無漏想,不著於想亦不住無相,是為入不二法門」。師子度水要截流直度,曲則不度。此大士以實相智慧深入諸法、直過彼岸,故借以為名。《成論》以失理取相心名有漏,得理忘相心名無漏。《毘曇》總以一切煩惱名之為漏,無則非漏。今了此二不二,名入不二法門。「淨解菩薩曰:有為、無為為二。若離一切數,則心如虛空。以清淨慧無所閡者,是為入不二法門」。為無為者,為之言作。法外別有四相能作於法,故名之為。以法有此為,故言有為。常法無為,故名曰無為。此有無相對也。次即法四相者,如即法起為生,故名為也。即法有此為,非法外有此為也。如無法,即法無此為,非法外方無也。前是毘曇義,後是成論說,並是二見亦不二也。「那羅延菩薩曰:世間、出世間為二。世間性空即是出世間,於其中不入不出不溢不散,是為入不二法門」。見道前名世間,見道已上名出世間。又從凡聖,有取相心為世間,無取相心名出世間。什公云「世間,三界也。出世間,一切無漏有為之道品也。」不入不出者,無入生死,故名無入。世間無出生死、無出世間,有入則有出,有出必有溢,有溢必有散,此俗內之常數也。「善意菩薩曰:生死、涅槃為二。若見生死性則無生死,無縛無解、不然不滅。如是解者,是為入不二法門」。上言為無為以總涅槃,但涅槃是三無為內之勝法,故別說之。又為無為多是小乘涅槃,大乘涅槃非為無為,是故別說。「現見菩薩曰:盡、不盡為二」。有人言:忘息為盡,真得常住名不盡。什公云「無常是空空初門,破法不盡,名為不盡。畢竟空破法盡,名為盡。」肇公云「有為虛偽法無常,故名盡。實相無為道常住,故不盡。」「法若究竟盡若不盡,皆是無盡相,無盡相即是空,空則無有盡不盡相。如是入者,是為入不二法門」。依前通者,究竟盡牒上盡義,簡異無常生滅之盡,故云究竟。若不盡者,牒前不盡,即真常也。皆無盡者,前二並空,空理常住,故云無盡。亦空理無法可除,亦名空盡。依肇公釋者,若以盡為盡、以不盡為不盡者,皆是二也。若能悟盡不盡不盡相者,則入一空不二法門也。「普守菩薩曰:我、非我為二。我尚不可得,非我何可得?見我實性者,不復起二,是為入不二法門」。萬善所持曰普,眾聖所護名守也。「電天菩薩曰:明、無明為二。無明實性即是明,明亦不可取,離一切數,於其中平等無二者,是為入不二法門」。十地師云:真妄同體,會妄成真,故云不二。如動水成波,波與水同體,還息波成水,名為不二。今謂不然,文云「明亦不可取」,則是兩捨,非會成。若了悟無明實性即是捨明,故云不二。若見明無明,便是無明,故知明亦不可取也。「喜見菩薩曰:色、色空為二。色即是空,非色滅空,色性自空,如是受想行識識空為二。識即是空,非識滅空,識性自空,於其中而通達者,是為入不二法門」。言空色不二者,不言非空非色名為不二,但明空與色無二體,故云不二也。色即是空者,標大乘空色不二也。非色滅空者,簡異凡夫所見。凡夫不達,謂色滅壞然後乃空,故今明非色滅然後空也。色性自空者,簡異小乘義也。如炎水自性空,不將四微分水大然後方空。「明相菩薩曰:四種異、空種異為二。四種性即是虛空性,如前際後際空故中際亦空。若能如是知諸種性者,是為入不二法門」。四種即是四大,空種謂空大也。此五各有大力,故名為大。是成眾生之因,稱之為種。又即此五事,種別不同,名之為種了。四種之有與空種不異,名入不二法門。故云無三際者,空種無三際,四種即空,故亦無三也。「妙意菩薩曰:眼、色為二。若知眼性,於色不貪不恚不癡,是名寂滅。如是耳聲、鼻香、舌味、身觸、意法為二,若知意性,於法不貪不恚不痴,是名寂滅。安住其中,是為入不二法門」。見眼色二,故起於三毒,如是好色起貪、惡色生恚、非好非惡則起無明。若知根本空,不起三毒。如四大成眼,則無一眼體。一眼體無故,則云無四大,故知無眼。以何見色起三毒邪?亦非作此觀色空無自性則無色矣。「無盡意菩薩曰:布施、迴向一切智為二。布施性即是迴向一切智性,如是持戒忍辱精進禪定智慧迴向一切智為二,智慧性即是迴向一切智性,於其中入一相者,是為入不二法門」。布施為因、一切智為果,謂因果二故。迴因向果,因果俱空,名為不二。又轉因為果,名為不二。如在菩薩心名波若,在佛心反成薩婆若,故無別兩種,則知不二。「深慧菩薩曰:是空、是無相、是無作為二。空即無相,無相即無作。若空無相無作,則無心意識,於一解脫門即是三解脫門者,即是為入不二法門」。破小乘人,謂三空為十六行是異體。今約境智,三門俱是一體。約境論不二者,唯一實相隨義分三,無別三體,故云不二。約觀者,唯一正觀離三取著故,為三實無三體。亦無心意識者,前盡緣,今息觀也。「寂根菩薩曰:佛、法、眾為二。佛即是法,法即是眾,是三寶皆無為相,與虛空等,一切法亦爾。能隨此行者,是為入不二法門」。此明一體三寶義,故不二也。但一體三寶,三處辨之。如一佛果上具三,覺義為佛、可軌名法、和義為僧,此通大小數論。二者三寶通皆是空,亦通大小,但《毘曇》所無。三者一體三寶,唯大乘有。問:云何為一佛耶?答:《涅槃》經文不同。若依涅槃義,則三寶皆以涅槃為體。是以經云「菩薩思惟:云何三事與我一體?佛自釋言:我說三事,即大涅槃。」故名一體。若據佛性論三寶,三寶同以佛性為體,所以經云「如是三歸即是我性」。若就真諦明三寶,三寶同用真諦為體,是以經云「若能觀三寶,常住同真諦」。若就常義明三寶,同以常為體,故經云「我亦不說佛法眾僧無有差別,唯說常住差別耳」。此並隨義說之,無相違背。今此文明三寶無異體者,正就同一無為,故言不二。「心無閡菩薩曰:身、身滅為二。身即是身滅。所以者何?見身實相者,不起見身及見滅身。身與滅身無二無分別,於其中不驚不懼者,是為入不二法門」。破小乘餘無餘涅槃二義。身謂五陰身,身滅即涅槃也。身本不生,今何所滅?不生不滅,故是不二。不驚不懼者,小乘初聞曰驚,怪受斯理為懼。諸法生時空生、滅時空滅,身存身亡亦何以異,而懷驚懼於其間哉?「上善菩薩曰:身口意業為二。是三業皆無作相,身無作相即口無作相,口無作相即意無作相,是三業無作相即一切法無作相。能如是隨無作慧者,是為入不二法門」。或者謂三業各有造作,故名為異耳。三業本空,同無作相,名為不二。「福田菩薩曰:福行、罪行、不動行為二。三行實性即是空,空則無福行、無罪行、無不動行。於此三行而不起者,是為入不二法門」。《大品經》云「行十不善,得三塗報,為罪行。行十善道,生欲界人天,稱為福行。修四禪等,生色無色界,名不動行。」《成論》文云「從欲界至三禪,名為福行。四禪竟無色,稱無動行。以第四禪已去,不為三災四受所動,故名無動。」不起三行則入實相門,名為不二。「華嚴菩薩曰:從我起二為二。見我實相者不起二法,若不住二法則無有識、無所識者,是為入不二法門」。因我故有彼,二名所以生。見我實相,則彼我已識無由而起。「德藏菩薩曰:有所得相為二。若無所得則無取捨,無取捨者是為入不二法門」。內得於我、外取於相,故名為二耳。內外俱空,名為不二也。「月上菩薩曰:闇與明為二。無闇無明則無有二。所以者何。如入滅受想定無闇無明,一切法相亦復如是。於其中平等入者,是為入不二法門」。二乘入滅盡定,視聽外忘、識知內滅,雖經晝夜不覺晦明,以喻菩薩無心於明闇。問:入滅盡定,諸心並無,何故偏云滅受想邪?答:受修諸禪想生無色,入滅盡定正滅上二界心,故偏言想受。又受多生愛、想多生見,既是過根本,故偏說之。「寶印手菩薩曰:樂涅槃、不樂世間為二;若不樂涅槃、不厭世間則無有二。所以者何?若有縛則有解;若本無縛,其誰求解?無縛無解則無樂厭,是為入不二法門」。《華嚴經》云「生死非雜亂,云何而厭?涅槃非寂靜,云何而樂?」「珠頂王菩薩曰:正道、邪道為二。住正道者則不分別是邪是正,離此二者是為入不二法門」。八邪為邪道,八正為正道。又小乘見為邪道,大乘真觀為正道。經正見者,不見邪亦不見正,非邪非正始名為正。住正道者,見邪外有正、正外有邪,若邪若正悉名為邪。「樂實菩薩曰:實、不實為二。實見者尚不見實,何況非實。所以者何?非肉眼所見,慧眼乃能見,而此慧眼無見無不見,是為入不二法門」。實相為實、虛妄為不實,悟實相者不見於實,何況非實。所見既非實非不實,能見亦非見非不見。非實非不實,寄言以為實;非見非不見,亦強詺以為見。斯則緣觀宛然,而境智俱寂也。「如是諸菩薩各各說已,問文殊師利:何等是菩薩入不二法門?文殊師利曰:如我意者,於一切法無言無說、無示無識,離諸問答,是為入不二法門」。此第二諸菩薩請文殊說不二。前請、次說。經有三句:一者二諦俱說;二者二諦俱不說;三者世諦說、真諦不說。今就後二門也。上來三十一人俱有六事:以口有音聲為言,以言顯不二法。為說,顯不二法曲受前人為示,令聽眾悟解為識,淨名命說為問,菩薩酬不二為答。是皆以言破法,未息破法之言。文殊欲息泯法之言,故辨無此六事也。「於是文殊師利問維摩詰:我等各自說已,仁者當說何等是菩薩入不二法門。時維摩詰默然無言」。此第三文殊請淨名說不二。前請、次詶、三稱嘆。諸菩薩以言遣法,文殊借言遣於言,淨名默然遣文殊之借言。不二之理乃同,而得有深淺之異。「文殊師利嘆言:善哉善哉!乃至無有文字語言,是真入不二法門」。此第三文殊稱嘆。淨名既其默示,文殊亦應默領,但為時眾生悟,故就言嘆善。又顯無言不傷於言,故以言嘆於無言。「說是入不二法門時,於此眾中五千菩薩皆入不二法門得無生忍」。此第二五千菩薩得入不二法門。

A single pure reality is called Non-Duality. The ultimate truth that can serve as a guide is called the Dharma. Its subtle and all-pervading nature is called the Gate. Realizing this principle is called Entering.

This teaching is the essential归宿 of all Buddhist doctrines and the profound source shared by all sages. It is the original intention behind Vimalakīrti's manifesting illness and the reason for Mañjuśrī's inquiry about his health. Why is this so? Because by embodying the principle of Non-Duality, one develops the contemplation of Non-Duality; through this contemplation, one can respond to beings without limitation; and through this limitless response, one leads all beings back to this very truth. Thus, the Lotus Sūtra says, "Ultimate nirvāṇa is the constant mark of tranquility, ultimately returning to emptiness." Emptiness is the principle of Non-Duality, the ground where all six realms of beings find refuge and where all sages merge in silent understanding.

Question: If Non-Duality is the fundamental principle, why wasn't it taught at the very beginning of the sūtra?

Answer: All the teachings given from the start of the sūtra are meant to help beings awaken to Non-Duality. They are skillful means that lead to the principle. Furthermore, one then wishes to use this Non-Duality to give rise to its two functions, which is why chapters like "The Gift of Food" appear—using the principle to establish teachings. Because it is taught between these two aspects, it can gather functions back into the essence and then arise from the essence to function. Therefore, it could not be taught at the very beginning.

The chapter is divided into two parts: first, the teaching on entering the gate of Non-Duality; second, the realization of the gate of Non-Duality. The teaching is further divided into three: first, Vimalakīrti asks the assembly to speak; second, the assembly asks Mañjuśrī to speak; third, Mañjuśrī asks Vimalakīrti to speak. The three sections clarifying Non-Duality are fully explained in the Profound Meaning. In the first, the various bodhisattvas all dissolve duality and illuminate Non-Duality, but they have not yet clarified that the principle of Non-Duality is beyond words. In the second, Mañjuśrī clarifies that the principle of Non-Duality is beyond words, yet he still speaks about Non-Duality. In the third, Vimalakīrti silently reveals that the principle of Non-Duality is beyond words and can be silent about Non-Duality. This demonstrates the three levels from shallow to profound, though the principle of Non-Duality itself has no depth or shallowness.

"At that time, Vimalakīrti said to the bodhisattvas in the assembly: 'Good sirs! How does a bodhisattva enter the gate of Non-Duality? Each of you should speak according to your own understanding.'"

Why does Vimalakīrti not speak himself but asks the assembly to speak? Because the host-guest questions and answers have already demonstrated the virtues of the two protagonists. Now he wishes to reveal the virtues of all the bodhisattvas, so he asks each to speak. Moreover, practitioners open their minds in different ways and awaken differently—some contemplate arising and ceasing to enter reality, others realize tranquility through existence and non-existence. Though their paths differ, their convergence is the same. Therefore, he draws on the common understanding of the assembly to certify the great purpose of this sūtra.

"In the assembly, there was a bodhisattva named Dharma Self-Mastery who said: 'Good sirs! Arising and ceasing are two. Since dharmas originally do not arise, there is no ceasing now. Attaining this patient acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'"

This is the second section—responding to the command and speaking. "Neither arising nor ceasing" can have three meanings: First, because there is no inherent nature in real arising and ceasing, we say there is no arising or ceasing—this is the worldly truth gate without arising and ceasing. Second, dependent arising and ceasing is itself non-arising and non-ceasing—this is the ultimate truth gate without arising and ceasing. Third, because worldly truth has existence, we call it arising; because ultimate truth has non-existence, we call it ceasing. What is neither mundane nor ultimate is the true principle, called non-arising and non-ceasing. Now, examining the intent of the sūtra, it clarifies the latter meaning. This non-mundane, non-ultimate is the principle of Non-Duality. By awakening to this principle, one attains the contemplation of Non-Duality, called the patient acceptance of non-arising—this is called entering.

"Bodhisattva Virtue Guard said: 'Self and what belongs to self are two. Because there is a self, there are things belonging to self. If there is no self, then there is nothing belonging to self. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'"

"Self and what belongs to self" also has two aspects: first, the concept of a real self and its possessions, as held by outsiders; second, the conventional, nominal self and its possessions. Now, without these two kinds of self and possessions, it is called the gate of Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Unwavering Gaze said:" Unwavering gaze has three aspects: First, like the celestial eye—the celestial eye does not blink. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra says, "Even the wheel-turning king's eyes still blink, distinguishing him from the celestial lord." Second, with love and reverence for the Buddha's body, one gazes steadily without blinking. Third, with a mind free of defilement, the wisdom eye is constantly open.

"Receiving and not receiving are two." First, in terms of causes, ordinary beings grasping and attaching is called receiving; sages without grasping or attaching are called not receiving. Second, in terms of results, the polluted five aggregates are called receiving; the unpolluted are called not receiving. Third, in terms of the nine categories, not receiving the other two, as explained in the Abhidharma. Here we follow the first meaning.

"If a dharma is not received, then it cannot be obtained. Because it cannot be obtained, there is no grasping and no rejecting, no creating and no acting. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality." "If a dharma is not received" means the mind has nothing it receives or attaches to. Originally, because of receiving, there is not-receiving. Since there is no receiving, there is also no not-receiving—hence it is said, "cannot be obtained." Previously, one did not see a not-receiving that could be grasped; now, one also does not see anything to reject—hence "no grasping and no rejecting." With no grasping and no rejecting, one does not create deeds of birth-and-death—hence "no creating." With no creating, the conditions of birth-and-death cease. When the conditions of birth-and-death cease, even right contemplation is forgotten—hence "no acting." By this point in the passage, there are three levels of meaning.

"Bodhisattva Summit of Virtue said: 'Impurity and purity are two. Seeing the true nature of impurity, there is no aspect of purity—accord with the aspect of cessation. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'"

"Bodhisattva Good Abode said: 'Movement and thought are two. Without movement, there is no thought. Without thought, there is no discrimination. One who understands this is called one entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" A subtle stirring of the deluded mind is called movement; deeply grasping at appearances is called thought. They differ only in beginning and end. Now, dissolving these two is called Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Good Eye said: 'One mark and no-mark are two. If one knows that one mark is itself no-mark, and also does not grasp no-mark, one enters equality. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" One mark refers to existing dharmas; no-mark refers to empty dharmas. For example, a pillar has a round mark; without roundness, it is called no-mark. Also, emptiness is one mark, and since the empty dharma itself has no mark, it is called no-mark. Now we dissolve these two.

"Bodhisattva Wondrous Arm said: 'The bodhisattva mind and the voice-hearer mind are two. For one who contemplates the nature of mind as empty like an illusion, there is no bodhisattva mind and no voice-hearer mind. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" In the past, through giving, his hands could produce endless treasures like four flowing rivers; hence the name Wondrous Arm. Some might think the voice-hearer mind is solely for self-benefit while the bodhisattva mind benefits others. Now we dissolve this—the inherent nature of mind is empty, never large or small.

"Bodhisattva Puṣya said: 'Good and not-good are two. If one does not give rise to good or not-good, enters the realm of no-mark, and understands this, this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Among the twenty-eight lunar mansions, the ghost star is called Puṣya, named after the star present at birth. The ten good deeds are good; the ten not-good deeds are not-good. In this case, from ordinary beings who initiate the ten goods up to the Buddha, all are good; the rest are not-good. This encompasses all dharmas. Also, accord with the path of transcendence is good—that is, the three vehicles' sages; opposing transcendence is not-good. All three natures of ordinary beings are not-good. Also, seeking the lesser vehicle is not-good, seeking the greater vehicle is good. Also, seeking both lesser and greater is also not-good; Non-Duality is called good. Here we follow the first meaning.

"Bodhisattva Lion said: 'Transgression and merit are two. If one penetrates the nature of transgression, it is no different from merit. With the diamond wisdom, clearly deciding this mark—no bondage and no liberation—is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Transgression and merit differ from good and not-good in that the essence is the same but the meaning differs. Benefit and harm are good and not-good; karmic retribution is transgression and merit. Transgression and merit mostly refer to results—doing good reaps abundant rewards called merit; doing evil incurs disastrous retribution called transgression. The diamond wisdom is like a worldly diamond: whether placed on a mountain top or flat ground, it passes straight through without obstruction, only stopping when it reaches the diamond bedrock. The wisdom of true reality, placed on the mountain of merit or the flat ground of transgression, passes straight through without obstruction, only stopping when it reaches the dharma-nature where transgression and merit share the same nature.

"Bodhisattva Lion's Intention said: 'Outflow and no-outflow are two. If one attains equality among all dharmas, one does not give rise to thoughts of outflow or no-outflow, does not attach to thoughts, and also does not abide in no-mark. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" A lion crossing water must cut straight across; if it zigzags, it cannot cross. This great being uses the wisdom of true reality to deeply penetrate all dharmas and cross directly to the other shore—hence the name. The Satyasiddhi treats the mind that loses principle and grasps at marks as outflow, and the mind that attains principle and forgets marks as no-outflow. The Abhidharma generally calls all afflictions "outflow"; without them, there is no outflow. Now, understanding these two as non-dual is called entering the gate of Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Pure Understanding said: 'Conditioned and unconditioned are two. If one departs from all enumeration, the mind is like space. With pure wisdom, nothing obstructs—this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" "Conditioned and unconditioned"—"conditioned" means "made." Apart from dharmas, there are four marks that can create dharmas, hence called "made." Because dharmas have this making, they are called conditioned. Eternal dharmas have no making, hence called unconditioned. This is the relative pair of existence and non-existence. Next, according to the view that the four marks are inherent in dharmas—as when a dharma arises, it is called birth, hence "made"—the dharma itself has this making; it is not a making apart from the dharma. Just as for non-existent dharmas, the dharma itself has this non-making; it is not a non-making apart from the dharma. The former is the Abhidharma view, the latter is the Satyasiddhi view—both are dual views, and both are Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Nārāyaṇa said: 'The world and the transcendence of the world are two. The emptiness of the world's nature is itself the transcendence of the world. In this, there is no entering and no leaving, no overflowing and no scattering. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Before seeing the path is called the world; from seeing the path onward is called transcendence of the world. Also, from the perspective of ordinary beings and sages, a mind that grasps at marks is the world; a mind without grasping at marks is transcendence of the world. Master Kumārajīva says, "The world is the three realms. Transcendence of the world is all the unconditioned and conditioned noble path factors." "No entering and no leaving"—there is no entering birth-and-death, hence "no entering." Since the world has no leaving birth-and-death and no transcendence of the world—if there is entering, there is leaving; if there is leaving, there must be overflowing; if there is overflowing, there must be scattering. This is the constant pattern within the mundane.

"Bodhisattva Good Intention said: 'Birth-and-death and nirvāṇa are two. If one sees the nature of birth-and-death, there is no birth-and-death, no bondage and no liberation, no burning and no extinguishing. One who understands thus is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Above, conditioned and unconditioned were mentioned to encompass nirvāṇa, but since nirvāṇa is the supreme dharma among the three unconditioned, it is discussed separately. Also, conditioned and unconditioned mostly refer to lesser-vehicle nirvāṇa; great-vehicle nirvāṇa is neither conditioned nor unconditioned—hence it is discussed separately.

"Bodhisattva Direct Vision said: 'Exhaustion and non-exhaustion are two.'" Some say that forgetting and ceasing is exhaustion, and truly attaining constancy is non-exhaustion. Master Kumārajīva says, "Impermanence is the initial gate of emptiness. When the devouring of dharmas is incomplete, it is called non-exhaustion. When ultimate emptiness devours dharmas completely, it is called exhaustion." Master Sengzhao says, "Conditioned dharmas are illusory and impermanent, hence exhaustion. True reality is the unconditioned path, eternal, hence non-exhaustion."

"If a dharma is ultimately exhausted or not exhausted, both are aspects of non-exhaustion. The aspect of non-exhaustion is emptiness. Emptiness has no aspects of exhaustion or non-exhaustion. One who enters thus is entering the gate of Non-Duality." Following the earlier interpretation, "ultimately exhausted" refers to the above meaning of exhaustion, distinguishing it from the exhaustion of impermanent arising and ceasing—hence "ultimate." "Not exhausted" refers to the above non-exhaustion, which is true constancy. "Both are non-exhaustion"—the previous two are both empty; the empty principle is eternal, hence "non-exhaustion." Also, the empty principle has no dharma to remove, also called "empty exhaustion." Following Master Sengzhao's explanation, if one takes exhaustion as exhaustion and non-exhaustion as non-exhaustion, both are dual. If one can awaken to the non-exhausting aspect of both exhaustion and non-exhaustion, one enters the single emptiness of the Non-Duality gate.

"Bodhisattva Universal Guard said: 'Self and non-self are two. Since self cannot be obtained, how can non-self be obtained? One who sees the true nature of self no longer gives rise to duality. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Sustained by myriad virtues is called Universal; protected by all sages is called Guard.

"Bodhisattva Lightning Heaven said: 'Illumination and ignorance are two. The true nature of ignorance is itself illumination. Illumination also cannot be grasped. Departing from all enumeration, being equal and non-dual within it—this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" The ten-ground masters say that true and deluded share the same essence; merging delusion into truth is called Non-Duality. Like stirring water into waves—waves and water share the same essence; calming waves back into water is called Non-Duality. Now, I say this is not so. The text says, "Illumination also cannot be grasped"—this is abandoning both, not merging into one. If one clearly awakens to the true nature of ignorance, that is abandoning illumination—hence "Non-Duality." If one sees illumination and ignorance, that itself is ignorance—therefore, we know illumination also cannot be grasped.

"Bodhisattva Joyful Vision said: 'Form and form-emptiness are two. Form is itself emptiness—it is not that form is extinguished and then becomes empty. The nature of form is originally empty. Likewise, feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness—consciousness and emptiness are two. Consciousness is itself emptiness—it is not that consciousness is extinguished and then becomes empty. The nature of consciousness is originally empty. One who penetrates this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" When we say emptiness and form are non-dual, we do not mean that neither emptiness nor form is called Non-Duality. We only clarify that emptiness and form have no dual essence—hence "Non-Duality." "Form is itself emptiness" points to the great-vehicle teaching that emptiness and form are non-dual. "Not that form is extinguished and then becomes empty" distinguishes this from what ordinary beings see. Ordinary beings, not understanding, think that after form is destroyed, it then becomes empty. Thus, we clarify that it is not that after form is extinguished it then becomes empty. "The nature of form is originally empty" distinguishes this from the lesser-vehicle teaching. Like a mirage of water—its nature is originally empty; it is not that the four elements break down the water element and then it becomes empty.

"Bodhisattva Illuminating Marks said: 'The four elements being different and the space element being different are two. The nature of the four elements is itself the nature of space—just as the past and future are empty, so the present is also empty. One who thus knows the natures of all elements is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" The four elements are earth, water, fire, and wind; the space element is space. These five each have great power, hence called "great." They are the cause of forming sentient beings, hence called "elements." Also, these five things differ in kind, hence called elements. Understanding that the existence of the four elements is no different from the space element is called entering the gate of Non-Duality. Hence, "no three times"—the space element has no three times; the four elements are space, so they also have no three times.

"Bodhisattva Wondrous Intention said: 'Eye and form are two. If one knows the nature of the eye, one is not greedy, hateful, or deluded toward form—this is called still extinction. Likewise, ear and sound, nose and smell, tongue and taste, body and touch, mind and dharmas are two. If one knows the nature of the mind, one is not greedy, hateful, or deluded toward dharmas—this is called still extinction. Abiding therein is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Seeing eye and form as two, one gives rise to the three poisons—toward pleasant forms, greed arises; toward unpleasant forms, hatred arises; toward neither pleasant nor unpleasant, ignorance arises. If one knows the fundamental emptiness, the three poisons do not arise. Since the four elements form the eye, there is no single eye-essence. Without an eye-essence, there are no four elements—hence we know there is no eye. With what does one see form and give rise to the three poisons? Also, it is not that one deliberately contemplates—form being empty has no self-nature, so there is no form.

"Bodhisattva Inexhaustible Intention said: 'Giving and dedicating to all wisdom are two. The nature of giving is itself the nature of dedicating to all wisdom. Likewise, morality, patience, vigor, meditation, and wisdom, and dedicating to all wisdom are two. The nature of wisdom is itself the nature of dedicating to all wisdom. One who enters the single mark within this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Giving is the cause, all wisdom is the result—hence cause and result are two. Dedicating the cause toward the result, both cause and result are empty—called Non-Duality. Also, transforming cause into result is called Non-Duality. For example, in the bodhisattva mind it is called prajñā; in the Buddha mind it becomes sarvajñā—so there are no two separate things. Thus we know Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Deep Wisdom said: 'Emptiness, marklessness, and wishlessness are two. Emptiness is itself marklessness; marklessness is itself wishlessness. If emptiness, marklessness, and wishlessness—then there is no mind, consciousness, or mentation. Within one liberation gate being the three liberation gates is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" This refutes lesser-vehicle practitioners who consider the three emptinesses as sixteen practices with separate essences. Here, in terms of object and wisdom, the three gates are one essence. In terms of the object, Non-Duality means that the single true reality, according to its characteristics, is divided into three—there is no separate three essences—hence Non-Duality. In terms of contemplation, the single right contemplation, free of three graspings, is three but has no three essences. "No mind, consciousness, or mentation"—the former ends conditions, now contemplation ceases.

"Bodhisattva Still Roots said: 'Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha are two. Buddha is itself Dharma; Dharma is itself Sangha. These three jewels are all unconditioned marks, equal to space. All dharmas are likewise. One who follows this practice is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" This clarifies the meaning of the three jewels as one essence—hence Non-Duality. But the one-essence three jewels are discussed in three places. First, on a single Buddha-fruit, all three are present: the aspect of awakening is Buddha, the aspect of being a guide is Dharma, the aspect of harmony is Sangha—this is common to both great and lesser vehicles' scholastic traditions. Second, the three jewels are all empty—also common to both vehicles, but not found in the Abhidharma. Third, the one-essence three jewels exists only in the great vehicle. Question: What is one Buddha? Answer: The Nirvāṇa Sūtra texts differ. According to the meaning of Nirvāṇa, the three jewels all take nirvāṇa as their essence. Thus the sūtra says, "The bodhisattva contemplates: How are the three things one with me? The Buddha himself explains: I say the three things are the great nirvāṇa." Hence "one essence." According to the Buddha-nature treatise on the three jewels, the three jewels share Buddha-nature as their essence. Thus the sūtra says, "These three refuges are my nature." According to ultimate truth, the three jewels share ultimate truth as their essence. Thus the sūtra says, "If one can contemplate the three jewels as eternal, abiding in the same ultimate truth." According to constancy, the three jewels share constancy as their essence. Thus the sūtra says, "I also do not say there is no difference among Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha—I only speak of differences within constancy." These are all spoken according to context without contradiction. Now this text clarifies that the three jewels have no different essence—precisely because they share the same unconditioned nature, hence Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Unobstructed Mind said: 'Body and the extinction of body are two. The body is itself the extinction of body. Why? One who sees the true nature of the body does not give rise to the view of a body or the view of extinction of body. Body and extinction of body are non-dual and without distinction. Not being startled or frightened within this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" This refutes the lesser-vehicle distinction between remaining and no-remaining nirvāṇa. "Body" refers to the five-aggregate body; "extinction of body" is nirvāṇa. The body originally does not arise—what is there to extinguish now? Neither arising nor ceasing—hence Non-Duality. "Not startled or frightened"—lesser-vehicle practitioners are startled upon first hearing this and frightened at accepting this principle. When dharmas arise, they arise empty; when they cease, they cease empty. What difference does the body's presence or absence make, that one should harbor startlement or fear?

"Bodhisattva Supreme Good said: 'Body, speech, and mind deeds are two. These three deeds all have the mark of non-creation. Body's non-creation mark is itself speech's non-creation mark; speech's non-creation mark is itself mind's non-creation mark. The non-creation mark of the three deeds is itself the non-creation mark of all dharmas. One who follows the wisdom of non-creation thus is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Some might think the three deeds each have their own fabrication, hence they differ. The three deeds are originally empty, sharing the same non-creation mark—called Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Field of Merit said: 'Meritorious deeds, transgressive deeds, and immovable deeds are two. The true nature of the three deeds is emptiness. In emptiness, there are no meritorious deeds, no transgressive deeds, and no immovable deeds. Not giving rise to these three deeds is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra says, "Doing the ten not-good deeds and receiving the three lower realms' retribution is transgressive deeds. Doing the ten good deeds and being born in the desire realm's human and heavenly states is called meritorious deeds. Cultivating the four dhyānas and being born in the form and formless realms is called immovable deeds." The Satyasiddhi says, "From the desire realm to the third dhyāna is called meritorious deeds. From the fourth dhyāna through the formless realm is called immovable deeds—because from the fourth dhyāna onward, one is not moved by the three calamities or four consciousness-receptions, hence 'immovable.'" Not giving rise to the three deeds, one enters the gate of true reality—called Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Adorned with Flowers said: 'Arising duality from self is two. One who sees the true nature of self does not give rise to two dharmas. If one does not abide in two dharmas, there is no consciousness and nothing known. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Because of self, there is other—hence the name "two" arises. Seeing the true nature of self, the consciousness of self and other has no ground to arise.

"Bodhisattva Treasure Store said: 'The mark of attainment is two. If there is no attainment, then there is no grasping and no rejecting. No grasping and no rejecting is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" Internally attaining a self and externally grasping at marks—hence called two. Both internal and external are empty—called Non-Duality.

"Bodhisattva Moon Rising said: 'Darkness and light are two. No darkness and no light—then there is no duality. Why? Just as entering the concentration of cessation of feeling and perception has no darkness or light, so too are the marks of all dharmas. One who enters equally within this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" When lesser-vehicle practitioners enter the concentration of cessation, they forget outer seeing and hearing and extinguish inner consciousness and knowing. Though days and nights pass, they do not notice darkness or light. This is used as a metaphor for the bodhisattva's mind being unconcerned with light and dark. Question: When entering the concentration of cessation, all mental functions are absent—why specifically mention feeling and perception? Answer: Feeling develops the dhyānas, perception develops the formless realms. Entering the concentration of cessation primarily extinguishes the minds of the two upper realms, hence feeling and perception are specifically mentioned. Also, feeling gives rise to much craving and perception gives rise to much views—since both are the root of transgression, they are specifically mentioned.

"Bodhisattva Precious Seal Hand said: 'Delighting in nirvāṇa and not delighting in the world are two. If one does not delight in nirvāṇa and does not reject the world, then there is no duality. Why? If there is bondage, then there is liberation. If there is originally no bondage, who seeks liberation? No bondage and no liberation—then there is no delight and no rejection. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" The Avataṃsaka Sūtra says, "Birth-and-death is not chaotic—how can one reject it? Nirvāṇa is not tranquil—how can one delight in it?"

"Bodhisattva King Pearl Top said: 'The right path and the wrong path are two. One who abides in the right path does not discriminate right from wrong. Departing from these two is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" The eight wrongs are the wrong path; the eight rights are the right path. Also, lesser-vehicle views are the wrong path; great-vehicle true contemplation is the right path. The sūtra says that right view means not seeing wrong and not seeing right—neither wrong nor right is truly called right. One who abides in the right path sees wrong outside right and right outside wrong—both wrong and right are all called wrong.

"Bodhisattva Delighting in Reality said: 'Real and unreal are two. One who truly sees does not even see the real, much less the unreal. Why? It is not seen by the flesh eye; only the wisdom eye can see it. But this wisdom eye has no seeing and no not-seeing. This is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'" True reality is the real; delusion is the unreal. One who awakens to true reality does not see the real, much less the unreal. What is seen is neither real nor unreal; what sees is also neither seeing nor not-seeing. Neither real nor unreal—provisionally called "real" in words; neither seeing nor not-seeing—also forcibly named "seeing." Thus, object and contemplation remain vividly present, yet object and wisdom are both still.

"After each of the bodhisattvas had spoken, they asked Mañjuśrī: 'What is the bodhisattva's entry into the gate of Non-Duality?' Mañjuśrī said: 'According to my understanding, with regard to all dharmas—no words, no speech, no showing, no knowing—departing from all questions and answers, this is entering the gate of Non-Duality.'"

This is the second section—the bodhisattvas asking Mañjuśrī to explain Non-Duality. First the request, then the explanation. The passage has three clauses: first, both truths are spoken; second, both truths are not spoken; third, worldly truth is spoken, ultimate truth is not spoken. Here we follow the latter two. The thirty-one above all have six activities: having vocal sound is "words"; using words to reveal the Non-Duality dharma is "speech"; revealing the Non-Duality dharma appropriately to the listener is "showing"; causing the audience to awaken and understand is "knowing"; Vimalakīrti commanding them to speak is "question"; the bodhisattvas responding about Non-Duality is "answer." All these use words to break dharmas but have not yet stilled the words that break dharmas. Mañjuśrī wishes to still the words that dissolve dharmas—hence he declares the absence of these six activities.

"Then Mañjuśrī asked Vimalakīrti: 'We have each spoken. Sir, what is the bodhisattva's entry into the gate of Non-Duality?' At that time, Vimalakīrti remained silent, without words."

This is the third section—Mañjuśrī asking Vimalakīrti to explain Non-Duality. First the request, then the response, then the praise. The bodhisattvas used words to dissolve dharmas; Mañjuśrī used words to dissolve words; Vimalakīrti used silence to dissolve Mañjuśrī's use of words. The principle of Non-Duality is the same, yet there are differences in depth and shallowness.

"Mañjuśrī praised: 'Excellent! Excellent! To have no words, no speech at all—this is truly entering the gate of Non-Duality.'"

This is the third section—Mañjuśrī's praise. Since Vimalakīrti had already silently demonstrated, Mañjuśrī should also silently acknowledge. But because the audience of that time needed to awaken, he praised with words. This also shows that wordlessness does not conflict with words—hence he praises wordlessness with words.

"When this teaching on the gate of Non-Duality was spoken, in this assembly, five thousand bodhisattvas all entered the gate of Non-Duality and attained the patient acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas."

This is the second part—the five thousand bodhisattvas attaining entry into the gate of Non-Duality.

維摩經義疏第五

8 佛道品(五)
10 香積品(六)

CBETA Code: T1781

© AI 帮你读佛经 - 如是我闻

This document is for personal learning only. Do not use for commercial purposes.

Visit rushiwowen.co

Copyright: Original texts from CBETA
AI translations are for reference only, not authoritative