---
title: "念佛警策 · 答卓發之文學"
description: "念佛警策由清代居士彭际清纂集，成书于乾隆年间。该书辑录了净土宗历代祖师大德关于念佛修行的精要开示、往生事迹及劝诫语录，旨在警策修行者精进念佛、深信切愿、求生净土。作为净土宗重要典籍，它系统总结了念佛实践的心要，强化了信愿行的修学体系，对清代以来净土法门的传播与修行产生了深远影响，是修习念佛法门不可或缺的指导性文献。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmex3bo3f249qjp04gioa3eyq"
---

### 答卓發之文學

> "Answering Zhuo Fazi's Literary Work"

無異禪師

問。華嚴會中二乘如盲如聾。然亦兼攝聲聞。以包含無量乘故。此經雖云二乘種不生。乃所宣道品大小互通。正與華嚴四聖諦品不異。故有生彼經劫方證小果者。如大智度論言。彌陀亦以三乘度生。自應三藏。五教總攝何云不攝小乘。且既通雜華。復不能通雜華所攝無量乘耶。

居士既知華嚴攝無量乘。豈不知上德聲聞如身子目連。杜視絕聽。悉是如來勝方便力故。為導引一類小機發起深信。信于一乘。如法華云。佛以無數方便引導眾生。其實皆為一佛乘故。此經云。二乘種不生者。正為化導二乘執空。不修淨土者。鈔云。豈獨凡夫。亦度二乘聖人。二乘既生。況菩薩不生。彌陀以三乘度生。當無疑惑。既以三乘化導。亦攝無量乘。二經互通。不言可喻。

> Since you, as a practitioner, already know that the Avatamsaka Sutra encompasses countless vehicles, surely you also understand that the foremost disciples of the Buddha, such as Shariputra and Maudgalyayana, though they seemed to shut their eyes and stop their ears to the higher teachings, were actually guided by the Buddha's supreme skillful means. This was to lead a certain type of lesser-capacity beings toward deep faith in the One Vehicle. As the Lotus Sutra says, "The Buddha uses countless skillful means to guide living beings, but in truth, it is all for the sake of the One Buddha Vehicle." As for this sutra's statement that "those of the Two Vehicles cannot be reborn there," it is precisely meant to teach and transform those attached to emptiness, who do not cultivate the Pure Land path. As the commentary explains, "It is not only ordinary beings—even sages of the Two Vehicles are delivered." Since even the sages of the Two Vehicles can be reborn there, how much more so the Bodhisattvas? Amitabha Buddha delivers beings through the Three Vehicles—of this there should be no doubt. And since he teaches through the Three Vehicles, he also encompasses countless vehicles. That the two sutras interpenetrate each other goes without saying.

問餘門學道。名豎出三界。念佛往生。名橫出三界。所謂餘門。正指教中觀行。故參禪稱為別傳淨土亦云徑路。皆以超越觀行故。今云觀即是念。念即是觀。直以台觀當之。不反鈍置念佛耶。

> When one asks about other methods of cultivation, the so-called "vertical escape" refers to transcending the three realms through direct effort, while reciting the Buddha's name for rebirth is called the "horizontal escape." What is meant by "other methods" primarily points to meditation and contemplation taught in the scriptures. Therefore, Chan practice is referred to as a separate transmission, and the Pure Land is also called a shortcut—both are expedient means that go beyond contemplation. Now, if we say that contemplation is mindfulness and mindfulness is contemplation, directly equating it with Tiantai contemplation, does this not diminish the importance of Buddha-name recitation?

橫豎等論。鈔云。如蟲在竹。豎則。歷節難通。橫則一時解脫。謂樂󳬛與苦域竝峙。故曰橫也。此是一往之說。論一心者。橫豎皆徧。彌陀經云。其佛光明無量。照十方國。無所障礙。觀經云。是心作佛。心即佛故。淨土唯心。以界曰橫。論心豈不圓具也。餘門非單指觀行。實乃具一切法門。參禪稱為別傳者。非五教之所詮。淨土亦云徑路。非三觀之所及。今說觀即是念。念即是觀。舉一念即具觀行。以一念超越。即便往生。非觀行成就。然後往生。故知念不妨攝觀。非觀行能鈍置念佛也。

問大本云。若有眾生。發一念心念無量壽佛。定生彼國。疏中尅期止及十念。而不及一念何邪。又念性剎那生滅。此經七日定力乃生。則未得禪定者無分。若此一念如一稱。成佛釋作一心歸命。則本不應繫十念之後。若止作一念喜愛之心。則全無定力。亦得往生。其勝方便又當超越小本邪。

十念與此本互相通故。何分優劣。以一念具一切念故。一念未必為劣。以十念即一念故。十念未必為優。是故說一念不妨十念。說十念不妨一念。又剎那際不妨七日。七日不妨剎那際經云一念普觀無量劫。無去無來亦無住。或說一念。或說十念。或說七日。或說多劫。皆是如來勝方便故。亦不論定不定。喜愛不喜愛。但一心念佛。無事不辦。如靈丹一粒。點鐵成金。更無疑慮。又何必以難易較其超越也。

問此七日。若平時姑置待臨終方念。已為天如所呵。今既屬平時。為是七日之後。盡此形壽。更不復亂邪。為復此後雖亂。終得往生邪。若永不復亂。不應止名七日。若更亂者。則已經退轉。何能感佛現前。

經云。一日乃至七日。是尅期往生。不論臨終平時。一聞佛名。便發猛銳。七日往生者不論。若未生者。在無間斷念念相續豈可七日得定。再不念佛。其執持二字。何以消文。疏中云。執者聞名受之。勇猛果決。不搖奪故。持者受斯守之。常永貞固。不遺忘故。何云七日後。復隨散亂邪。行者一心正念。更加猛利以終身。如初發念頃。何愁佛不感孚也。

問鈔中明理一心為觀力成就。則體究全屬觀門。但前言妙觀難成。故顯持名殊勝。今乃復通觀法。仍是定觀勝于持名矣。若云參誰字是體究。則又全屬宗門。且當參話時不應有念。未免兩處負墮義云何通。

前言妙觀難成。顯持名殊勝。良以娑婆之眾。心多散亂。故持名攝念。勝乎觀門。今乃復通觀法。以觀境殊勝。不妨速於持名。以持名徑捷。不妨超乎觀法。兩處義成。何得云墮。若宗門參究。是逗機之法。不必與淨土和會。如參念佛者是誰。便屬言語道斷。又不可以理路為依傍也。

問一部疏鈔。大意全重理持。則所明持法。最為要害。今既是持名。復標理觀既是理觀復拈話頭禪淨止觀三法混淆。雖復義理圓融而行人念不歸一。將何為宗。此與一門深入專修無間之旨。復何不侔。

疏鈔一部。雖則全歸理觀。如元譚云守約則唯事持名。又云舉其名兮兼眾德而咸備。專乎持也統百行以無遺。則知專尚持名。不妨發明理觀。觀理明徹。如膏益火。則更增猛熾也。如華嚴大部攝無量乘。上根利智頭頭是路。亦不名混淆。但以根器相投。亦吾師翁之善巧耳。

問疏指至心念佛一聲。滅八十億劫生死重罪。屬理一心。若事一心者。多念止滅少愆。乃又引佛名經云一聞佛名滅無量劫生死之罪。釋云一聞則不待憶念。無量則不但八十億劫。然則何必獨指理一心也。覺于此中自相違礙。又此經亦言聞經聞名。皆得不退。則等閒發願。散亂稱名者。咸不退邪。

果得一心。則不論理事。疏鈔謂多念止滅少愆者。此是就散亂而冀一心者說也。聞名滅罪。眾生在迷。亦復不知。如地獄聞名。即得究竟。并獲往生者。何止滅罪。蓋論眾生心力之勤怠耳。大凡教中論理論事。論定論散。如用兵之法式。臨陳決勝。貴在當人。必不以法式楷定。然後為正論也。

問棗柏言華嚴一乘大道。非往生菩薩境界。何故華嚴長子。乃以十願導歸極樂。如生公說闡提有佛性。則後出涅槃為證。今行願全與棗柏不符。則一論宗旨。竟將安歸。乃雲棲但拈出導歸之文。亦不能折棗柏之誤。當知棗柏未易輕詆。今欲和會兩義其說云何。

棗柏謂華嚴非往生菩薩境界。為顯一乘。不妨抑彼揚此。普賢導歸極樂。正謂攝無量乘故。棗柏為化大心凡夫頓入華藏故。普賢是華藏中菩薩。以十願導歸極樂者。為三根普利故。如觀方入一隅。則十方普現故。良以大心難發。極樂易生。究竟旨歸。彼此符合。則知棗柏原非錯誤。雲棲安得以是為非邪。

問諸經多言念佛行人。現前見佛。如遠公三覩聖相等。所謂念佛人佛住其頂。古德教人求志求驗。正在平時。今經止言臨終佛現。豈七日功成。未能現見。僅感臨終邪。抑必現前見已。然後臨終得見邪。

諸經多言行人現前見佛。亦有當來見佛之語。楞嚴云。憶佛念佛。現前當來必定見佛。其必定二字。深有旨趣。如種穀得穀。必無虗棄之功也。遠公三覩聖像現前見佛也。淨土諸師臨終感佛來迎。當來見佛也。由此觀之。只愁不念佛。不愁行人。不見佛也。無論平時七日。但一心不亂。專持名號。喚醒自性彌陀。一切佛菩薩皆影現其中矣。

問世尊言諸修行人。用攀緣心為自性者。猶如煑沙欲成嘉饌。今念佛心是攀緣心邪。非攀緣心耶。若用攀緣心者。一切覺觀思惟。皆是生死根本。若非攀緣心者。何言念性生滅。因果殊感。若云此生滅心即不生滅心。何云煑沙。乃法華所云。若人散亂心。一稱南無佛。南能所云不斷百思想。對境心數起。又非用此生滅心邪。

世尊斥世間人認攀緣心為自性。非斥用攀緣心入自性。豈不聞圓覺云。以幻修幻。天台專用六識。阿難云。供養如來。亦因此心。永退善根。亦因此心。以此推之。此心亦不惡。可以為入道之前茅。論乎真性。何用念為。論乎樂土。非念莫生。文殊云。念性生滅。此為選耳根圓通。淨業智人。安得隨文殊脚跟轉。文殊如修般舟三昧。又當以我念佛為良導。法華一稱。塵勞起而佛道成。南能不斷。妄想興而涅槃現。又當留待別時。向居士一一道破。