---
title: "洛陽伽藍記合校本 · 清．毛扆跋"
description: "北魏杨衒之撰写的洛阳伽蓝记是一部记述北魏都城洛阳佛教寺院兴衰的地方志著作。张宗祥先生的合校本综合历代版本精校而成具有很高学术价值。该书以北魏洛阳城佛寺为纲目详述了孝文帝迁都后洛阳佛教的鼎盛景象包括永宁寺等名刹的规模与盛况同时穿插了政治历史社会风俗和人物轶事。它不仅是研究北魏历史佛教史和中古城市建筑的重要文献更被誉为中国佛教地理志的开山之作为了解南北朝佛教艺术与社会变迁提供了珍贵的一手资料。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmgmyl2tl0ilzl104iuqgwe2d"
---

洛陽伽藍記世傳如隱堂本内多缺字第二卷中脫三紙好事者傳寫補入人各不同余昔年於市肆購得抄本取而校之知從如隱板影寫者行間字面為朱筆改竄大都參以御覽廣記諸書其書無可考者以意為之空白處妄自填補大失本來面目矣後又得何慈公抄本則又從改本錄出真偽雜投竟無從辨三本之中此為最劣大抵古人著書各成一家言所見異辭所聞異辭所傳聞異辭故爵里姓氏互有不同魯魚後先焉知孰是士生千百世後而讀古人流傳轉寫之書苟非有善本可據亦且依樣胡盧須在心領神會不可擅加塗乙也顧寡薄自用致誤非淺恃才妄作貽害更深惡似而非者葢以此也家刻原稿更從慈公所來似是處亦宜增入注一作者即肊改字也惜乎付梓之時未見點竄筆跡遂致涇渭不分深痛此書之不幸而今日者又仍入余手得以從流溯源考其致誤之由則不幸之中又有深幸焉校畢漫識於此并戒後之讀我書者

> The Record of the Buddhist Monasteries in Luoyang has long been known to contain many missing characters in the Ruyin Hall edition. In the second volume, three folios were missing. Devoted collectors copied and filled in the gaps, each doing so differently. Years ago, I obtained a handwritten copy from a marketplace, and upon collating it, I found it to be a transcript made from the Ruyin woodblock. The lines and characters had been altered in red ink, largely referencing sources like the \*Taiping Yulan\* and the \*Guangji\*. For parts where no source could be verified, the copyist filled in blanks arbitrarily, greatly distorting the original appearance. Later, I obtained another manuscript from He Cigong—one that was copied from the revised version. The authentic and forged elements were so mixed together that I could no longer distinguish them. Among the three versions, this one was the worst. Generally, scholars of antiquity each produced their own works, recording different views, hearing different accounts, and transmitting different traditions. Thus, names and origins often differed, and clerical errors multiplied—who can say which is correct? Living hundreds or thousands of generations later, we read texts passed down through copying; unless we have an authoritative edition as our basis, we can only follow the general form with cursory acceptance. Understanding must come from insight and intuition, not arbitrary emendations. Yet, relying on meager knowledge and unwarranted confidence leads to grave errors; conversely, presuming to act recklessly causes even greater harm. I abhor what appears right but is actually wrong—this is precisely why. The family-published draft, originating from Cigong, seems plausible in places and should include annotations; one note indicates characters that were deliberately altered from the original. Regrettably, at the time of publication, the red-ink traces of the revisions were not seen, leaving pure and impure waters indistinguishable—a deep sorrow for this book's misfortune. Now that the book has come full circle and fallen into my hands again, I can trace the source, follow the current back to its origin, and examine the reasons for its errors. In this, beyond misfortune, there lies profound fortune. After collating, I wrote this note casually, as a warning to future readers of my work.

柔兆執徐之嵗如月十日鐙下毛扆識

> Mao Yi recorded this by lamplight on the tenth day of the second month in the year of Ren Yin.