---
title: "洛陽伽藍記合校本 · 清．李葆恂又記"
description: "北魏杨衒之撰写的洛阳伽蓝记是一部记述北魏都城洛阳佛教寺院兴衰的地方志著作。张宗祥先生的合校本综合历代版本精校而成具有很高学术价值。该书以北魏洛阳城佛寺为纲目详述了孝文帝迁都后洛阳佛教的鼎盛景象包括永宁寺等名刹的规模与盛况同时穿插了政治历史社会风俗和人物轶事。它不仅是研究北魏历史佛教史和中古城市建筑的重要文献更被誉为中国佛教地理志的开山之作为了解南北朝佛教艺术与社会变迁提供了珍贵的一手资料。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmgmyl2tl0imbl104weok6n25"
---

國朝諸儒鑒明季輕改古書之弊所刻書凡字句各異介在疑似者別為札記不改本書葢其慎也吳氏集證與札記同余刻是書凡集證已出如范明友作友明高貴鄉公作高貴卿公祖瑩作祖榮雖灼知其謬俱仍之以存其舊集證不出庸是梓人之誤則元乂徑改元义集證高貴鄉公誤作貴高卿公則貴高互乙而卿字仍之其他類此者多有為舉其例如此

> During the Qing dynasty, scholars recognized the harm caused by the casual alteration of ancient texts in the late Ming. When they published books, any variation in wording or ambiguity in meaning was recorded separately in collation notes, leaving the original text unchanged—a cautious and respectful approach. Wu's \*Collected Annotations\* (Jizheng) functions similarly to these collation notes. In my edition, wherever the \*Collected Annotations\* has already noted a variant, I keep the original error unchanged to preserve the textual tradition. For example: - Fan Mingyou is written as "You Ming" (instead of "Mingyou"), - The "Noble Duke of Gaogui" (Gaogui Xianggong) is written as "Gaogui Qinggong," - Zu Ying is written as "Zu Rong." Even when I clearly know these are mistakes, I retain them. For cases not documented in the \*Collected Annotations\*, if the error is clearly the printer's fault, I correct it directly. For instance, "Yuan Yi" might be corrected from "Yuan Cha," and in the \*Collected Annotations\*, "Gaogui Xianggong" is mistakenly reversed to "Guigao Xianggong"—with "Guigao" swapped and "Xianggong" retained. Many similar cases exist, and these examples illustrate the principle.

八月十二日猛堪校集證畢又記

> We have crossed it carefully on August 12th wishing for truth's penetration day ends: Thus recollect.