---
title: "洛陽伽藍記合校本 · 鈎沉序"
description: "北魏杨衒之撰写的洛阳伽蓝记是一部记述北魏都城洛阳佛教寺院兴衰的地方志著作。张宗祥先生的合校本综合历代版本精校而成具有很高学术价值。该书以北魏洛阳城佛寺为纲目详述了孝文帝迁都后洛阳佛教的鼎盛景象包括永宁寺等名刹的规模与盛况同时穿插了政治历史社会风俗和人物轶事。它不仅是研究北魏历史佛教史和中古城市建筑的重要文献更被誉为中国佛教地理志的开山之作为了解南北朝佛教艺术与社会变迁提供了珍贵的一手资料。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmgmyl2tl0imcl104u4qddc8g"
---

### 洛陽伽藍記鈎沉序

> Preface to the Rediscovery of the Record of Buddhist Monasteries in Luoyang

昔唐劉知幾謂洛陽伽藍記定彼榛楛列為子注斯言已逾千嵗而世行本皆刊於明代子注已雜入正文無復分別亦竟無人為料理出之此書遂不可讀矣近者之江吳氏創始為之畫分段落正文與注甫得眉目然究嫌其限域未清混淆不免雖少勝於舊編猶未盡夫塵障鄙人索居海上偶展此書覺有會於心乃信手鈎乙數則以後迎刃而解都已盡卷未敢謂足揆原編然較各本則有間矣錄而存之以備一家之說云爾嗟乎衒之良史才也彼葢身丁元魏之季見夫胡后貪權廢長立少諸王酣豢縱欲養驕大臣無元良之佐宦寺逞城社之威文士優柔武夫跋扈遂以釀成河隂之禍故此書於爾朱之亂三致意焉逮夫鑾輅西行邦圻遷鄴元氏之局告終渤海之基方肇而衒之又所目覩黍離之悲無可寄慨乃於洛陽伽藍託其懷舊之思焉豈真為彼教之助乎宜其寥寥一篇孤行殆將千二百年而莫之能廢也殺青既竟更為條例敘之左方

> Once, Liu Zhiji of the Tang dynasty remarked that \*A Record of Buddhist Monasteries in Luoyang\* had clarified its confusion and clearly distinguished the main text from the author's own notes. This was over a thousand years ago, yet all extant editions from the Ming dynasty have mixed the notes into the main text, making no distinction whatsoever. No one has since sorted them out, rendering the book nearly unreadable. Recently, Wu of Zhejiang initiated a separation by marking paragraphs and thus separating the main text from the notes. For the first time, a semblance of order emerged. Yet still the boundaries are blurred, and confusion remains. Though it surpasses earlier editions, it has not entirely cleared the dust. Living in seclusion by the shore, I happened to open this book and felt a sense of understanding. Following this, I casually marked a few passages with hooks, and the rest fell naturally into place. In no time, I finished the entire volume, though I dare not claim it perfectly matches the original. Still, it stands apart from all previous editions. So I have recorded it and preserved it, to present my own interpretation. Alas! Yang Xuanzhi was a historian of great talent. He lived during the late Northern Wei, witnessing Empress Dowager Hu's greed for power, deposing the elder heir in favor of the younger. The princes indulged in luxury and debauchery, fostering arrogance, while ministers lacked virtuous guidance. Eunuchs and officials abused their court influence, scholars became weak-willed, and soldiers grew unruly—all these brewing the disaster at Heyin. Therefore, this book repeatedly dwells upon the chaos of Erzhu Rong. When the imperial chariot fled westward and the capital moved to Ye, the Yuan dynasty came to an end, and the foundation of the Eastern Wei began. Yang Xuanzhi, still an eyewitness, could find nothing to express his sorrow over the decline but took refuge in the monasteries of Luoyang, pouring his nostalgia for the past. Was he merely serving the Buddhist cause? Thus this single slender volume has stood for nearly twelve hundred years, and no one could set it aside. Now, when the writing is completed, I have laid out the principles below.

-   古人箸書必有一定體裁北魏人箸述在者惟此暨水經注耳故今刊定此書全用水經注體裁
-   書記伽藍自應以寺為主而時事輔之故凡渉及寺事例高一格書而餘文坿之
-   名稱洛陽則凡市里亦概入正文高一格書之官寺亦然
-   凡渉及時人第宅亦高一格然必由里及居不復特出
-   此外坿注概為低一格書若坿注之外有楊氏案語則作夾行書所謂注中有注也
-   此書誤字極多有可考訂則再三斟酌而從其一若竟無可從而灼見其為某字間有以意定之者然必以△別之
-   此書各本互有不同吳氏別為考異今仿阮氏刻經疏例凡遇考訂之字旁以圈別之
-   楊氏此書意在借伽藍而存時事故於元氏諸王及公卿多述其行事而河隂一役言之尤詳今搜採魏書及北史凡書中人物皆略注其大概而它有足以引證此書者亦坿焉
-   吳氏書有圖一紙而小有未合今改訂而仍以冠於其首焉

乙卯春二月漯川居士唐晏敘扵海上飛塵小住

> In the spring of the year Yimao, in the second month, the lay practitioner Tang Yan of Luochuan composed this preface at his temporary dwelling amidst the flying dust by the sea.