DonateZen HallLibrary
Skip to main content
  1. Lotus Sutra Finger-Palm Commentary (法華經指掌疏)
  2. First Part (第一之上)
  3. Four Noble Truths Sutra (經題)
←&→
Use ← → arrow keys to turn pages

Lotus Sutra Finger-Palm Commentary (法華經指掌疏)

About 法華經指掌疏

Qing · by 通理述

277,374 · about 925 min

The Finger-Palm Commentary on the Lotus Sutra is an important Buddhist commentary authored by the eminent Qing dynasty monk Tongli. This work was produced during the Qianlong era and stands as one of the authoritative Huayan school interpretations of the Lotus Sutra in the Qing dynasty. Master Tongli harmonized the essential teachings of the Lotus Sutra with Huayan thought, systematically elucidating the sutra’s core doctrines such as the One Vehicle of true reality and the opening of provisional means to reveal the true teaching. He particularly emphasized the methods of cultivation practice. This commentary is rigorously structured and precise in interpretation, regarded as a key text for studying the Lotus Sutra and the integrative thought of Chinese Buddhism. It holds a pivotal position in the history of Buddhist doctrinal development, serving as a bridge between past and future, and is highly valued by scholars both within and outside the Buddhist community.


法華指掌疏卷一之上
賢宗後學 通理 述
嗣法門人 明遠 較字
△九總釋名題(名以顯實。題以標宗。故於未解經前而總釋之。謂總釋全經之義於名題也。又名謂能譯人名。題謂所譯經題。今並釋之。故云總釋)二。一經題。二譯人。初。
妙法蓮華經。
上二字。直顯法義。妙者。當體得名。非對麤言妙。若對麤言妙。則妙有分限。非圓妙故。又妙者。本來自妙。非先麤後妙。若先麤後妙。則妙有始終。非常妙故。釋義。則甚深無量。難解難入曰妙。又惟佛與佛。乃能究竟曰妙。又聲聞辟支。所不能知曰妙。經云。止止不須說。我法妙難思。故題中以妙字冠法。法即今經。以實相為體。以軌持為用。實相為體者。以七軸雄文。皆如來自一乘實相中演出。一言一句。無非顯示一乘實相。故為體也。軌持為用者。軌謂軌生物解。持謂任持自性。軌生物解者。謂一切眾生。本具實相之體。但以昏於無明。閉於權宗。勝解不生。入證何由。佛以此法。開方便門。示真實相。俾眾生借教觀心。因指見月。是為軌生物解用也。任持自性者。謂一切眾生。本性一乘佛性。第以根有利鈍。惑有厚薄。乘裂為三。性流為五。佛以此經。開顯會歸。俾三乘同歸一乘。五性還復一性。是為任持自性用也。然此上。釋義雖就本經。法言猶濫諸會。故冠以妙字揀之。顯諸會不得名妙也。若論此法。普收諸會。本不可揀。故前云非對麤言妙。今又云揀者。正以普收諸會。揀彼諸會不能普收。乃不得已而揀之。仍不違不揀義也。又此法稱妙者。依經文略示四義。一權實相即故。經云。諸佛所得法。無量方便力。而為眾生說。又云。我設是方便。令得入佛慧。上三句即實而權。下二句即權而實。以諸會多不能相即故。二本迹相通故。經云。我常住於此。以諸神通力。令顛倒眾生。雖近而不見。又云。時我及眾僧。俱出靈鷲山。我時語眾生。常在此不滅。上四句本通於迹。下四句迹通於本。以諸會多不能相通故。三理事無礙故。經云。是法住法位。世間相常住(是法。指一乘實相。理也。法位。指諸法自位。事也。世間相。指有為法。事也。常住指無為法。理也)。上句理不礙事。下句事不礙理。以諸會多不能無礙故。四因果交徹故。經云。世尊於長夜。常愍見教化。令種無上願。又云。我今無復疑。安住於佛道。方便為侍者。上三句因徹於果。下三句果徹於因。以諸會多不能交徹故。然此四義。總屬理事無礙法界。至於放光現瑞。湧塔變土。地涌現神等。又屬事事無礙。不可思議之境。即妙亦不可言。不得已強名曰妙也(問。儒教聖人。惟以中庸之道示人。猶曰民鮮能久矣。今經題首言妙。豈不動人驚駭。阻人勝進乎。答。妙之一字。正為起人羨慕。激人進修耳。果能直下承當。驀地回頭。則妙法非遠。原在日用動用中也)。蓮華二字。借喻發明。古德有取青蓮釋者。有取白蓮釋者。有取香水海中蕋香幢釋者。今據本經文義。當以優曇鉢華釋之。以此華乃與文義相應故。經云。如是妙法。諸佛如來時乃說之。此二句。與妙法二字相應。次云。如優曇華。時一現耳。此二句。與蓮華二字相應。且此經文。是身子三請之後。如來開章之語。故知如是妙法。指一經之全體。優曇鉢華。舉一經之總喻。取斯釋題。庸何議焉。若釋義有二。一翻靈瑞。以此華不開則已。開則有佛出世。為聖靈之瑞故。般泥洹經云。閻浮提有尊樹王。名優曇鉢。有實無華。若有華者。必是金色。乃有佛出。以此名為靈瑞華也。亦云瑞應。以此華不現則已。現則有輪王出世。為聖王之兆故。施設論云。統贍部洲。有輪王路。廣一踰繕那。無輪王時。海水所覆。若輪王出。海水減一踰繕那。此路皆現。優曇鉢華。同時而生。以此名為瑞應華也。此二皆屬義翻。若以色類翻者。當云金蓮華。金色已見泥洹。欲知云何是蓮華者。準諸經有四種蓮華。一曰優鉢羅(青色)。二曰拘勿頭(黃色)。三曰鉢頭摩(赤色)。四曰芬陀利(白色)。今優曇鉢。與優鉢羅梵音相似。其不全同者。或即金色青色之異。取此為喻者。依本經。謂此華非時不現。必時至方現。喻此法非時不說。必時至方說故。準泥洹略開為三。一此華名尊樹王。喻此法為諸經中王故。二此華有實無華。華必金色。喻此法純談果體。間說因行。行必契真故。三此華不開則已。開則必有佛出。喻此法不說則已。說則授記成佛故。準施設亦有三義。一此華出輪王路。喻此法惟佛乘方有故。二此華與路同現。喻聞此法者。即到佛地故。三此華惟供輪王遊觀。喻此法惟供法王受用故。此上七義。皆總喻全經。以妙法原屬全經之名。蓮華亦唯全經之喻。若經中之別義。臨文自有別喻。茲不預焉(問。優曇既是蓮華。題中何不存梵。經中何不易華。什師何不譯為靈瑞。古德何不翻為蓮華。疏序通經中。何亦註為方華即果。答。題不存梵者。示種類故。經不易華者。示尊重故。什師不譯靈瑞者。以靈瑞之名。此方所無。置之題中。恐人不識為喻故。古德不翻蓮華者。以雖是蓮華。不同常途。約義而翻。欲人知其殊勝故。疏序通經。註為方華即果者。以彼不過略出義相。不暇詳辯。姑且隨順常途解釋。亦不欲盡廢古釋之意。至若名題關乎一經。可不辯哉。可不辯哉)。經字。結出詮體。梵語修多羅。此云契經。契謂上契諸佛之理。下契眾生之機。經有多義。束之成四。一曰貫。謂貫穿所應知義。二曰攝。謂攝持所應度生。三曰常。謂三世不易。四曰法。謂十界同軌。今不言契者。以此方聖教。但稱為經。順此方故。又契字是用。經字是體。舉體該用故。又妙法蓮華。既屬所詮。自具契合之用。不待言故。絕論此題。乃金口所宣。法喻為名。合能所。兼體用。該通別。貫虗實。故名妙法蓮華經焉。經題竟(附釋卷次)。卷第一(卷者對舒而言。謂舒之以便誦持。卷之以便供奉也。上古經書。多以軸為卷。今易制未易其名耳。第謂次第。一首數也。經凡七卷。以次第論。此卷居初。故云第一。後皆凖知)。

譯者

CBETA Code: X0631

© AI 帮你读佛经 - 如是我闻

This document is for personal learning only. Do not use for commercial purposes.

Visit rushiwowen.co

Copyright: Original texts from CBETA
AI translation for reference only — not authoritative, not a statement of final truth. Awakening of the Dharma requires personal practice.