瑜伽師地論略纂卷第六(論本第十三第十四第十五)
Concise Compendium of the Yogācāra-bhūmi-śāstra, Volume Six<note>Commentary on Original Chapters
基撰
Recorded by Ji
地第四段,釋第五義諸經宗要。眾雜事中有二:上釋宗要,下釋雜義。文分為二:初十一復次別引經釋、後以四正法攝持聖教。
The fourth section explains the fifth meaning: the essential teachings of the sutras. Among the various topics, there are two parts: the first explains the essential teachings, and the second explains miscellaneous meanings. The text is divided into two sections: first, eleven further explanations citing specific sutras; second, summarizing the sacred teachings through the four correct dharma methods.
初經明身心遠離,引如實覺。
The first sutra clarifies how to distance oneself from body and mind, leading to genuine awakening.
第二經善修止觀,覺了所知。
The Second Teaching: Cultivate Calm and Insight, and Fully Understand What You Perceive.
第三經等持、等至等於善巧中,文分為三:初、引經標;第二、兩復次釋經四句;第三、「云何為住」下,別釋十四句經。「其等愛」下,例翻不等愛為一句,故成十四句。 「調善句」下,有行拘執、法性拘執釋調善中,此二標文非釋經句。其四句中,初復次以定相對為四句。其等持名目十一種,空、無相等最殊勝故,緣境遍故,偏得彼名。其等至名亦目六種,勝處、遍處能成變化,滅盡等至唯聖所成,故偏得名。為初二偏句。俱句之中,略舉遍處,例勝處、滅定。標無想定,顯諸異生所成等至,亦入此句。五現見等至,亦應別說,義小隱故,略而不說。餘皆准知。故下結言「如是於先所說等持、等至中,隨其所應,當善建立」。此中從勝,且偏說故。第二四句中,唯作初二句。 「等持善巧非等至善巧者,謂於等持名、句、文身善知差別,非於能入等至諸行、狀、相差別」等者,此說善巧,三慧為性。其等持者,今此中說,略有二義:平等定為所持,行者為能持,我能持等定,故名等持。又所詮定名之為等,能詮定教名之為持,教能持定,故名等持。其等至者,所入定名為等,能入定行、狀、相名等至,能至等故,名等至。至者到義,因能入果,至於等故。又所入定名等至,義如常釋。由此等持、等至各有二義,故此四句相對不同。此中,初句定教為等持,能入定諸行、狀、相名等至;第二句以能入等至諸行、相、狀及所入定俱名等至,以詮定教能入行者名為能持。 「有諸菩薩雖能得入」下,顯於等至善巧非等持相,指諸菩薩以明其義。 「乃至未從諸佛所聞」等下,釋於等持非善巧有三義:一、未從佛聽聞,二、未於第一菩薩所聽聞,三、未自證得第一究竟,故於定教不能善知。上一未字,下貫三處。 「於不定地分別體相所攝」者,散境也。此即是地不同類法故,思惟散境,名出定也。「定所作者,謂飲食」等者,此是出定所應作事,由至此時,應出定故。 「所緣相者,謂分別體。由緣此故,能入諸定」者,諸有漏皆名分別故,定所緣名分別體,相分離見無別性故。或此所緣以五法中分別所現相體為所緣相。「云何引發?謂能略攝廣文句義」,此聞持力攝廣文義。 「云何等愛?謂慚、愧、愛、敬」等者,此謂定前起十二種法:一、慚;二、愧;三、愛;四、敬;五、信;乃至第十二、樂。以此為方便,心便得定。於此十二平等愛故,名為等愛。
The third sutra on mastery of meditative concentration and meditative attainment is divided into three parts: first, citing the sutra as a heading; second, explaining the four phrases of the sutra through two repetitions; third, beginning with "What is abiding," separately explaining the fourteen phrases of the sutra. After "equal affection," the opposite of unequal affection is analogously explained as one phrase, thus forming fourteen phrases.
Following "the phrase of well-tamed," there are explanations of active clinging and dharma-nature clinging within the well-tamed section. These two headings are not explanations of the sutra phrases. Among the four phrases, the first repetition uses meditative concentration in relation to form the four phrases. The term "meditative concentration" refers to eleven types, with emptiness and signlessness being the most supreme, as their objects are universal, thus uniquely bearing that name. The term "meditative attainment" also refers to six types: the bases of mastery and totalities can accomplish transformations, while the attainment of cessation is only achieved by saints, thus uniquely bearing that name. These are the first two exclusive phrases.
Among the combined phrases, the totalities are briefly mentioned, with the bases of mastery and the attainment of cessation analogously included. The attainment of non-perception is noted to show that meditative attainments achieved by ordinary beings are also included in this phrase. The five direct perceptions of meditative attainments should also be separately explained, but as their meaning is somewhat subtle, they are briefly omitted. The rest can be understood accordingly. Therefore, the conclusion below states: "Thus, among the previously explained meditative concentrations and meditative attainments, they should be well-established as appropriate." Here, for the sake of emphasis, they are explained exclusively.
In the second set of four phrases, only the first two are addressed. "Mastery of meditative concentration but not mastery of meditative attainment means being skilled in discerning the differences in names, phrases, and expressions of meditative concentration, but not in the conduct, characteristics, and signs of entering meditative attainment." This explanation of mastery takes the three wisdoms as its nature. Meditative concentration here is explained in two senses: the balanced concentration is what is held, and the practitioner is the holder; "I can hold balanced concentration," thus it is called meditative concentration. Alternatively, the concentration being explained is called "balanced," and the teachings explaining concentration are called "holding"; the teachings hold the concentration, thus it is called meditative concentration. As for meditative attainment, the concentration entered is called "balanced," and the conduct, characteristics, and signs of entering concentration are called "attainment," as they reach the balanced state, thus it is called meditative attainment. "Attainment" means to arrive; the cause of entering leads to the fruit, reaching the balanced state. Alternatively, the concentration entered is called meditative attainment, as commonly explained. Because meditative concentration and meditative attainment each have two meanings, these four phrases are contrasted differently. Here, the first phrase takes the teachings on concentration as meditative concentration, and the conduct, characteristics, and signs of entering concentration as meditative attainment. The second phrase takes both the conduct, characteristics, and signs of entering meditative attainment and the concentration entered as meditative attainment, while the teachings on concentration and the practitioner entering are called the holder.
"Some bodhisattvas, though able to enter..." clarifies the characteristic of mastery of meditative attainment but not meditative concentration, using bodhisattvas to illustrate the meaning. "Until they have not heard from the buddhas..." explains three reasons for not being skilled in meditative concentration: first, not having heard from the buddhas; second, not having heard from the foremost bodhisattvas; third, not having personally realized the foremost ultimate, thus unable to skillfully know the teachings on concentration. The single "not" above applies to all three cases.
"That included in the characteristics of the objects of the indeterminate realm" refers to scattered objects. These are dharmas of different categories within the realm; contemplating scattered objects is called emerging from concentration. "What is done in concentration, such as eating and drinking..." refers to activities that should be done after emerging from concentration, as it is at this time that one should emerge.
"The sign of the object means the characteristic of discrimination. By relying on this, one can enter the various concentrations." All that is conditioned is called discrimination, so the object of concentration is called the characteristic of discrimination, as the perceived aspect is inseparable from the perceiver and has no distinct nature. Alternatively, this object takes the characteristic of the appearance of discrimination among the five dharmas as the sign of the object. "What is elicitation? It means being able to condense extensive phrases and meanings." This is the power of retention to condense extensive meanings.
"What is equal affection? It means shame, conscience, affection, respect..." This refers to twelve dharmas arising before concentration: first, shame; second, conscience; third, affection; fourth, respect; fifth, faith; up to the twelfth, joy. Using these as expedient means, the mind attains concentration. Having equal affection for these twelve is called equal affection.
第四、分別靜慮經中,文有四:一、引經標;二、略釋四轉;三、廣釋相;四、結成。 「此中四轉,當知二時顛倒」等者,四轉者:一、有漏三摩地趣進時顛倒;二、有漏定趣退時顛倒;三、有漏定正退失無倒;四、無漏定正進時無倒。或初二於進謂退,名為顛倒。初於有漏定進時謂退,後於無漏定進時謂退,故皆名倒。論說第二。
Fourth, in the Discourse on Differentiating Meditative Absorptions, the text has four parts: first, citing the scripture to indicate; second, briefly explaining the four reversals; third, elaborating on their characteristics; fourth, concluding.
"Among these four reversals, one should understand that two are reversals at certain times," etc. The four reversals are: first, the reversal when progressing in a mundane meditative concentration; second, the reversal when regressing in a mundane meditative absorption; third, the correct recognition of regression in a mundane meditative absorption, which is not a reversal; fourth, the correct progression in a supramundane meditative absorption, which is not a reversal. Alternatively, the first two, regarding progression, are mistaken as regression, thus called reversals. The first, during progression in a mundane meditative absorption, is mistaken as regression; the latter, during progression in a supramundane meditative absorption, is mistaken as regression—both are therefore called reversals. The treatise explains the second.
「於三摩地退時顛倒」者,修進無漏,趣退有漏時,謂顛倒。後二退時謂退,名為無倒。初於有漏定實退時謂退,後於無漏定退有漏時謂退。 於有漏定退時謂退中,文有三復次:一、由愛味故退;二、由慢毀故退;三、由貪誑故退。「第二無倒,翻初無倒,應知其相」者,謂得無漏定,將失有漏定時,如實知退,是名無倒。第三無倒,退時知退。第四無倒,無漏進時,知有漏退。此中,第四與前第二有差別者,前修無漏方便猶未證得,謂退曾得定;今第四正得無漏,有漏不行,謂之為退:故成差別。
"When it says 'mistaken perception at the time of retreat from samādhi,' this refers to the mistaken view that arises when one is cultivating the path toward the non-outflow state but then regresses back to the outflow state. The latter two instances of retreat are correctly recognized as retreat, which is called 'non-mistaken.' The first instance, when one actually retreats from the outflow state, is called retreat. The later instance, when one retreats from the non-outflow state back to the outflow state, is also called retreat.
Regarding the retreat from the outflow state, the text provides three explanations: first, retreat due to attachment and craving; second, retreat due to arrogance and contempt; third, retreat due to greed and deceit.
'The second non-mistaken perception, in contrast to the first mistaken one, should be understood as follows': This means that when one attains the non-outflow state and is about to lose the outflow state, one correctly recognizes this as retreat, which is called non-mistaken.
The third non-mistaken perception is knowing retreat at the time of retreat. The fourth non-mistaken perception is knowing the retreat of the outflow state when advancing in the non-outflow state.
Here, the difference between the fourth and the second is as follows: In the second case, one is still in the process of cultivating the non-outflow state but has not yet attained it, and thus speaks of retreat from a previously attained state. In the fourth case, one has truly attained the non-outflow state, and the outflow state ceases to function—this is called retreat. Hence, the distinction arises.
第五、分別四撿行經中,文有三:一、引經標;二、略顯撿行相;三、廣顯示所撿行。即四分淨定為所撿,能撿察即三慧,此即一人具修四種。
Fifth, in the Sutra on the Four Kinds of Examination, the text has three parts: first, citing the sutra to establish the framework; second, briefly presenting the characteristics of examination; third, extensively explaining the objects of examination. Here, the four kinds of purified concentration serve as the objects to be examined, while the ability to examine them lies in the three kinds of wisdom. This means that a single practitioner cultivates all four kinds.
第六、於六境不受想無相經,文有二:初牒經,後別釋。 「於此諸法若實若有都不領受」者,不受境自相也。 「尚不受想」者,尚不受六境之想。 「何況無想」者,亦不受彼無想也。下釋有三: 「無有眼想」釋尚不受於想。 「不受自相」釋都不領受。 「不受無想」釋何況無想。
Sixth, the Sutra on Not Perceiving Form in the Six Objects of Perception. The text has two parts: first, citing the sutra; second, explaining it separately.
"Not perceiving these phenomena as real or as existing" means not perceiving the inherent nature of the objects. "Not even perceiving thought" means not even perceiving thoughts about the six objects. "How much less perceiving no-thought" means also not perceiving that state of no-thought.
The explanation below has three parts: "No perception of the eye" explains "not even perceiving thought." "Not perceiving inherent nature" explains "not perceiving these phenomena as real or as existing." "Not perceiving no-thought" explains "how much less perceiving no-thought."
「由厭壞故,威勢映奪乃至能有其想」者,謂無漏定數思厭壞,遂於眼等無有事想,唯有四諦諸理相起。 「不受無想」者,想與無想皆悉不受。由不思惟一切相故,有、空二想皆悉不受,故於滅盡真如理中思惟寂靜。 此中意說離諸相想,名無想者,無分別智正證如時,前苦樂等相亦皆離之,想與無想一切皆出離,故離相想名為無想。
"Through aversion to destruction, the power of perception is overshadowed and even capable of giving rise to thought" means that through repeatedly contemplating aversion to destruction in the state of unconditioned concentration, one no longer perceives the existence of the eyes and other senses, and only the principles of the Four Noble Truths arise.
"Not accepting the absence of thought" means that both thought and the absence of thought are not accepted. By not contemplating all appearances, one does not accept either the thought of existence or the thought of emptiness, and thus, in the true principle of cessation, one contemplates tranquility.
Here, it is meant that transcending all appearances and thoughts is called "the absence of thought." When the wisdom of non-discrimination directly realizes suchness, the previous appearances of suffering and happiness are also transcended. Both thought and the absence of thought are entirely transcended, so transcending appearances and thoughts is called "the absence of thought."
第七、釋四趣道經有三:初標、次釋、後顯差別。初、唯有漏,依定引,起無漏道故;第二、依定起慧;第三、依二起二;第四、初依定起慧,後依慧起定。第二、第三通有漏、無漏,第四亦爾,俱引見道及修道、無學道故。
Seventh, Explanation of the Four Paths of Practice. The scripture presents three aspects: first, the main categories; second, their explanation; and third, the clarification of their distinctions.
First, the main categories: 1. The path that is exclusively conditioned and arises from meditation, leading to the unconditioned path. 2. The path that arises from wisdom based on meditation. 3. The path that arises from both meditation and wisdom. 4. The path that first arises from wisdom based on meditation, and later arises from meditation based on wisdom.
Second, their explanation: The second and third paths can be either conditioned or unconditioned. The fourth path is also the same, as they all lead to the path of insight, the path of cultivation, and the path of no more learning.
第八、釋四淨勝經中有三:初、標淨勝經;次、釋淨勝義;三、釋四淨勝想。 「謂所得、所證、所引戒」等者,所得者,謂若圓滿法;所證者,謂若攝受法;所引戒等者,謂發勤精進,未滿令滿法。 四淨勝者:一、尸羅;二、三摩地;三、見;四、解脫。 此中所得、所證、所引戒等言,皆通四淨勝。 「圓滿、攝受」下,文牒釋。發勤精進,未滿令滿足,所引戒、定、見、解脫體,故不牒釋。 又所得者,戒;所證者,定、見;所引者,解脫。 戒等者,等定、見、解脫,互顯所得、所證、所引。 下七云何,初一為戒,其等持、見、解脫各二云何,隨應配釋。 「雖住具戒」等四句六支,如〈聲聞地〉廣說。 戒、定二種:異生位,名圓滿;得其聖位,名攝受。見在異生位,名未圓滿;入聖位,名圓滿;無學位,名攝受。解脫在有學位,未圓滿;無學位,名圓滿;不時解脫,名攝受。解脫定障及事障所得擇滅,名解脫。
Eighth: Explaining the Four Purifying Victories Sutra. This contains three parts: first, identifying the Purifying Victories Sutra; second, explaining the meaning of purifying victory; third, explaining the four purifying victory contemplations.
"Regarding what is attained, what is realized, and what is cultivated through precepts, etc." Here, "what is attained" refers to the Dharma that is brought to completion. "What is realized" refers to the Dharma that is embraced and absorbed. "What is cultivated through precepts, etc." refers to diligently applying effort to bring what is incomplete to completion.
The four purifying victories are: 1. Precepts (Śīla) 2. Concentration (Samādhi) 3. Insight (Dṛṣṭi) 4. Liberation (Vimokṣa)
In this context, the terms "attained," "realized," and "cultivated through precepts, etc." all apply to these four purifying victories.
The phrases "brought to completion" and "embraced and absorbed" are explained in the text. Diligently applying effort to bring what is incomplete to completion refers to cultivating the essence of precepts, concentration, insight, and liberation, so it is not separately explained here.
Furthermore, "what is attained" refers to precepts; "what is realized" refers to concentration and insight; "what is cultivated" refers to liberation.
"Precepts, etc." includes concentration, insight, and liberation, mutually clarifying what is attained, realized, and cultivated.
In the following seven contemplations, the first pertains to precepts, while concentration, insight, and liberation each have two contemplations, which are explained accordingly.
The four lines and six aspects, such as "though abiding in complete precepts," are explained in detail in the *Śrāvaka-bhūmi*.
Regarding precepts and concentration: - In the state of an ordinary being, they are called "brought to completion." - Upon attaining the noble state, they are called "embraced and absorbed."
Regarding insight: - In the state of an ordinary being, it is called "not yet complete." - Upon entering the noble state, it is called "brought to completion." - In the state of a non-learner, it is called "embraced and absorbed."
Regarding liberation: - In the state of a learner, it is not yet complete. - In the state of a non-learner, it is called "brought to completion." - For one who is liberated without delay, it is called "embraced and absorbed."
Liberation from the hindrances of concentration and worldly affairs, attained through the cessation of selective elimination, is called liberation.
第九、釋心清淨行苾芻思惟五相經中,文有五:初、引經標;二、釋清淨行;三、明行障;四、別釋思惟五相;五、結成。 「障」者,即諸不善欲、恚、害尋,親里、國土、不死尋,所曾經樂等,七種尋思皆為障體。
Ninth: In the Sutra on the Monk Who Cultivates Purity of Mind by Contemplating Five Aspects, the text has five parts: first, citing the sutra to mark the topic; second, explaining the practice of purity; third, clarifying the obstacles to practice; fourth, separately explaining the contemplation of five aspects; fifth, concluding.
"Obstacles" refer to the seven types of discursive thoughts, all of which constitute the essence of hindrances: unwholesome thoughts of desire, ill will, and harm; thoughts of relatives, homeland, and immortality; and thoughts of past pleasures and the like.
三、別釋五相中有二:初、總標三品尋思差別成五;二、別釋五。第一、耎品尋思行者,思惟因果等諦相故,令七種尋滅。依中品尋思,分成二種:一、見尋思過患,二、不念思惟,令七尋滅。依上品尋思,亦分成二:一、非初即令一切不行,要當方便,漸尚折伏;二、若猶未能伏,便生厭悕,多思惟故,令七尋滅。
III. Detailed Explanation of the Five Aspects, in Two Parts: First, a general overview of the three grades of analytical thought, distinguished into five aspects. Second, a detailed explanation of the five aspects.
1. Practitioners of the **mild grade of analytical thought** contemplate the characteristics of truths such as cause and effect, thereby causing the seven types of discursive thought to cease.
2. Based on the **moderate grade of analytical thought**, this is further divided into two: a. Recognizing the faults of discursive thought. b. Not dwelling on thoughts, thereby causing the seven types of discursive thought to cease.
3. Based on the **superior grade of analytical thought**, this is also divided into two: a. Not immediately suppressing all thoughts at once, but skillfully and gradually subduing them. b. If one is still unable to subdue them, one develops weariness and longing, and through repeated contemplation, causes the seven types of discursive thought to cease.
第十、《蕩塵經》中,文有三:初、引經問;二、釋三陶練;三、舉法合。 「如金性內所有生金」下,是發心出家,名初陶練;在資糧道位,得靜慮等,是次陶練;入聖位已,是後陶練,故論說言「不為有行之所拘執」。依慧根伏,令根姓顯,根除煩惱,立陶練名。
Tenth, in the *Sutra of Cleansing the Dust*, the text has three parts: first, citing the sutra to ask; second, explaining the three stages of purification; third, presenting the Dharma to correspond.
"Just as within the nature of gold there is raw gold" onward refers to the initial stage of purification, which is the arising of the mind to leave the household life. Attaining meditative concentration and so forth in the stage of the path of accumulation is the second purification. Entering the stage of the noble ones is the final purification. Therefore, the treatise states, "not bound by conditioned actions." Relying on the wisdom faculty to subdue defilements, the innate nature becomes manifest. As the roots of afflictions are eradicated, the name "purification" is established.
第十一、釋於三相思惟經有三:一、引經標;二、釋三相;三、結成差別。三相者:一、止;二、舉;三、捨。一向修止、舉,在定加行,於緣起等不正思擇,不思擇故心不正定,不能現觀,不盡諸漏成阿羅漢;數思惟捨,便思緣起,乃至漏盡,道成滿故。
Eleventh: Explaining the Sutra on Contemplating the Three Characteristics
There are three parts: first, citing the sutra as a reference; second, explaining the three characteristics; third, concluding the distinctions.
The three characteristics are: first, calming; second, arousing; third, letting go.
If one exclusively practices calming and arousing, and during the preparatory stage of meditation, one does not correctly contemplate dependent origination and so forth, then due to not contemplating, the mind does not attain correct concentration, and one cannot realize direct insight. Consequently, one does not exhaust the defilements and become an arhat.
By repeatedly contemplating letting go, one then contemplates dependent origination, and so forth, until the defilements are exhausted, and the path is fully perfected.
上十一段,別引經釋。下一復次,以四正法攝持聖教,有三:一、標;二、列;三、釋。 「遠離」者,入定處所。 「修習」者,所修定慧。 「修果」者,謂所得解脫,所離二障,有無為果。 「云何已習奢摩他」下,釋此第三。 「無乖爭」者,行善順教,資善順師,故善契理、宗、教,無違返,名無乖爭。「若義若句若文」,不說名者,舉初、後以貫中故。「第一句者,所謂前句乃至即以此句而問第二」等者,此略明於句平等潤洽。 前句者,第一句也。如尊者阿難於五百苾芻中,以此初句問一比丘,復以初句問第二比丘,乃至五百,彼皆答言如是如是,乃名師弟義句無乖,平等潤洽,互相隨順,句義同故。師弟同,教教同,教義同,義義同,行教同,皆准知也。「設於初一,依蘊而問乃至不得名互相隨順」,此返顯也。設於初一,巧上依蘊而問,恐有第二同類行者而不解前所問義,故以餘問。依問既殊句義,便別云何得名平等潤洽?初二行者果證既同,有知不知,句義問別,師弟相返教義不同,故非平等潤洽隨順。以佛弟子證見同故,教義師弟互不相乖。外道見殊,遞相乖返。非三摩呬多地境用之中,上釋等引位,下釋非等引位。《釋論》云:翻前易了,體即欲界全、上二地中一切散法。然觀此論文意,十二不定中,第七、第九、第十三種不定地是上界六、七作意,第八是上界染法。此地不唯翻前地是,亦通上二界一切法。 文分為二:初問起標、後隨別釋。此十二種,〈決擇〉六十三廣說差別建立所由,謂依初不定地,於安住心,應正取相,謂青瘀相等;此說五識性不定故,於境馳流,貪等生起,為止息故,觀青瘀等而安住心。即以此義,西方二說:一云五識唯是有漏,性不定故,性散亂故,說十五界唯有漏故。成所作智,或第六識,或第七識。二云依諸二乘、異生者說十五界有漏,自性不定,非依餘位。於中有說成所作智,菩薩修道即現在前,有說佛地方得初起。如《唯識》第十、《佛地》第四等釋。 「或有闕輕安,名非定地,謂欲界繫心、心所」等,六十三云:依止此故,為得作意,應勤修習。此言意說,為得上界作意,應勤修習欲界善心;或厭闕輕安欲界散地,為得上界輕安地作意,應勤修習。《唯識》兩說。有義:欲界無輕安,以此文為證,言善十一通一切地者,通有尋伺地等三地俱有故;有義:欲界亦有輕安,彼定加行亦得定地,彼亦微有調暢義故,除定加行,餘欲界心皆闕輕安名不定地,非一切無。說善十一通一切地,即九地故。餘十不定地,如六十三釋。
The previous eleven sections separately cite scriptures for explanation. Next, "furthermore," there are four correct dharmas that uphold the sacred teachings, divided into three parts: first, the heading; second, the listing; third, the explanation.
"Distancing" refers to the place where one enters meditation. "Practice" refers to the meditation and wisdom being cultivated. "The fruit of practice" refers to the liberation attained, the two hindrances abandoned, and the conditioned and unconditioned fruits.
Starting from "How does one who has already practiced śamatha..." explains this third part.
"Without conflict" means acting in accordance with goodness, following the teachings, supporting goodness, and complying with the teacher. Thus, one harmonizes with the principle, the tradition, and the teachings, without contradiction or opposition, which is called "without conflict."
"If in meaning, if in phrasing, if in wording"—the name is not mentioned because the beginning and the end are used to encompass the middle.
"The first phrase, which is the preceding phrase, and even using this phrase to ask the second," etc., briefly clarifies the equal and harmonious blending of phrases.
The "preceding phrase" refers to the first phrase. For example, the Venerable Ānanda, among the five hundred bhikṣus, used this initial phrase to ask one bhikṣu, then used the same initial phrase to ask a second bhikṣu, and so on up to five hundred. They all replied, "Thus, thus." Only then can it be said that the teacher and disciples are in harmony in meaning and phrasing, equally blended, mutually following in accordance, because the phrasing and meaning are the same. The teacher and disciples are the same, the teachings are the same, the meaning of the teachings is the same, the meaning is the same, and the practice of the teachings is the same—all are understood accordingly.
"If in the first instance, one asks based on the aggregates, and so on, it cannot be called mutually following in accordance"—this is the reverse explanation. If in the first instance, skillfully asking based on the aggregates, there may be a second practitioner of the same type who does not understand the meaning of the previous question, so one asks differently. Since the basis of the question differs, the phrasing and meaning also differ—how can it be called equal and harmonious blending? If the first and second practitioners have the same realization of the fruit, but some know and some do not, and the phrasing and meaning of the questions differ, then the teacher and disciples contradict each other, and the teachings and meanings are not the same. Therefore, it is not equal, harmonious blending, or mutual accordance. Because the disciples of the Buddha have the same realization and insight, the teachings, meanings, teacher, and disciples do not conflict. Outsiders have different views and contradict each other in turn.
Within the realm and function of non-samāhita-bhūmi, the above explains the state of samāhita, and the below explains the state of non-samāhita.
The *Commentary* says: The opposite of the previous is easy to understand. The essence is entirely the desire realm and all scattered dharmas within the two upper realms. However, considering the meaning of this treatise, among the twelve indeterminates, the seventh, ninth, and thirteenth types of indeterminate grounds are the mental activities of the sixth and seventh consciousnesses in the upper realms, and the eighth is the defiled dharmas of the upper realms. This ground is not only the opposite of the previous ground but also encompasses all dharmas of the two upper realms.
The text is divided into two parts: first, the question that raises the heading; second, the separate explanations that follow. These twelve types are extensively explained in the sixty-third chapter of the *Discernment*, discussing their distinctions and the reasons for their establishment. It says: Based on the first indeterminate ground, for stabilizing the mind, one should correctly grasp the signs, such as the sign of blueness and swelling, etc. This explains that the nature of the five consciousnesses is indeterminate, scattering toward objects, giving rise to greed and so on. To stop this, one contemplates blueness, swelling, etc., to stabilize the mind.
Based on this meaning, there are two theories in the West: One says the five consciousnesses are solely with outflows, because their nature is indeterminate and scattered. It is said that the fifteen realms are solely with outflows. The wisdom of accomplishing what is to be done belongs either to the sixth consciousness or the seventh consciousness. The other says that for śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and ordinary beings, the fifteen realms are with outflows and their nature is indeterminate, but this does not apply to other states. Among these, some say the wisdom of accomplishing what is to be done arises in the practice stage of bodhisattvas; others say it first arises only at the Buddha stage. This is explained in the tenth chapter of the *Consciousness-Only* and the fourth chapter of the *Buddha Ground*, among others.
"Or lacking lightness and ease, it is called non-meditative ground, such as the mind and mental factors bound to the desire realm," etc. The sixty-third chapter says: Relying on this, to attain mental engagement, one should diligently practice. This means that to attain the mental engagement of the upper realms, one should diligently practice the wholesome mind of the desire realm; or, weary of lacking lightness and ease in the scattered ground of the desire realm, to attain the mental engagement of the lightness and ease ground of the upper realms, one should diligently practice.
The *Consciousness-Only* presents two theories. One meaning: The desire realm lacks lightness and ease, citing this text as proof. It says the eleven wholesome factors pervade all grounds, meaning they are present in the three grounds with investigation and analysis, etc. Another meaning: The desire realm also has lightness and ease. The preparatory practice for meditation there also attains the meditative ground, and it also has a slight sense of ease and flexibility. Except for the preparatory practice for meditation, all other minds of the desire realm lack lightness and ease and are called indeterminate ground, but not all are devoid of it. It is said that the eleven wholesome factors pervade all grounds, meaning the nine grounds.
The remaining ten indeterminate grounds are explained in the sixty-third chapter.
有心、無心地。初九地,三乘境中分四,此之二地,第四段辨境位,六識有心、無心二位別故。文分為二:初問標五門、後隨別釋。
Mind and No-Mind. The first nine stages, within the context of the Three Vehicles, are divided into four parts. These two stages, the fourth section, clarify the realms and positions, distinguishing between the six consciousnesses having mind and having no mind. The text is divided into two parts: first, the question sets out five topics; then, each is explained separately.
地建立中,唯依初五地辨地建立,非依餘者,但依地體。五識、意地,有名有心,無名無心,辨有無心,相猶未顯,未知九地何處義成,舉地體性。於有尋等地三相之中,以辨有心及無心者,即知九地二位差別,亦知定非定地何者有心、何者無心,故更不須依定非定地辨有無心。三慧、三乘、六地諸行有無心別,不出前門有無餘依。
In the establishment of the stages, only the first five stages are used to distinguish the establishment of the stages, not relying on the others, but solely on the nature of the stages. The five consciousnesses and the mental stage have names and mind, while those without names lack mind. To distinguish between having mind and lacking mind, the characteristics are not yet fully apparent, and it is unclear where the meaning of the nine stages is established. Therefore, the nature of the stages is referenced. Among the three characteristics of the stages with investigation and so on, distinguishing between having mind and lacking mind clarifies the differences between the two aspects of the nine stages. It also reveals which stages have mind and which lack mind in terms of meditative and non-meditative states. Thus, there is no further need to rely on meditative or non-meditative states to distinguish between having mind and lacking mind. The distinctions of having or lacking mind in the three wisdoms, three vehicles, six stages, and various practices do not go beyond the previously mentioned categories of having or lacking residual attachments.
此第四、第五門中辨有心、無心,非有身位有無心別故,有無心唯依五地。 有尋有伺地中,無心睡眠、無心悶絕不名無心地者,以睡眠、悶絕無心不定故。 無尋無伺地中,無想定等,定無心故。 又睡眠、悶絕依主識說,名有心地;無想定等依客識說,名無心地。影略說故。 又依隨轉理門以辨無心。薩婆多說悶絕有心故。 然〈決擇分〉復依五義辨有心地,由七種因辨無心地,唯依地體以辨有心。依此第三、生與不生建立無心。 彼說七因,此八因者,此開根、境,彼合名緣闕。其八因緣,如六十三釋。 問:若許二乘入無餘依,云何不許眾生界減?經說眾生界無增無減故。答:如海無邊,除去一滴,非為增減。生死海中,此亦如是。又《上無依經》眾生界者,謂如來藏性。眾生雖有入無餘依,彼如來藏無增無減。故彼經言:阿難!是如來界無量無邊,為煩惱塵之所隱蔽,隨流生死,無始輪轉,我以此義,名眾生界。若依此義,真為妄性,妄依真立,妄雖起滅,真無增減。又《楞伽經》說:諸聲聞經於多劫,入涅槃界,耽三昧酒,長時醉臥,後從彼起,發大心者;《攝大乘》說:化作聲聞,非實如此,故無餘依,身心並滅。
In the fourth and fifth sections, the distinction between having mind and being mindless is discussed. This is not about whether there is a mind in the body or not, but rather about the presence or absence of mind being based solely on five states.
In the state of having both investigation and examination, mindless sleep and unconsciousness are not considered mindless states because the absence of mind in sleep and unconsciousness is not definite.
In the state of having neither investigation nor examination, states like the concentration of no-thought are definitely mindless.
Furthermore, sleep and unconsciousness are spoken of in terms of the primary consciousness, thus they are called states with mind. States like the concentration of no-thought are spoken of in terms of secondary consciousness, thus they are called mindless states. This is a brief and implicit explanation.
Moreover, the discussion of mindlessness follows the principle of dependent origination. The Sarvāstivāda school says that even in unconsciousness, there is mind.
However, in the "Section on Determination," the state of having mind is explained based on five meanings, while the mindless state is explained through seven causes, focusing only on the nature of the state itself. Based on this third point, the establishment of mindlessness is about whether mind arises or not.
The seven causes mentioned there correspond to the eight causes here. Here, the faculties and objects are distinguished, while there they are combined under the term "lack of conditions." The eight causes and conditions are explained in detail in the sixty-third section.
Question: If it is accepted that the two vehicles enter the state of no remainder, why is it not accepted that the realm of sentient beings diminishes? The sutras say that the realm of sentient beings neither increases nor decreases.
Answer: It is like the ocean, which is boundless. Removing one drop does not increase or decrease it. In the ocean of birth and death, it is the same. Moreover, in the *Anuttarāśraya Sūtra*, the realm of sentient beings refers to the nature of the Tathāgata-garbha. Even though sentient beings may enter the state of no remainder, the Tathāgata-garbha neither increases nor decreases. Therefore, that sutra says: "Ānanda, this realm of the Tathāgata is immeasurable and boundless, obscured by the dust of afflictions, flowing in birth and death, turning in the cycle of existence from beginningless time. It is by this meaning that I call it the realm of sentient beings."
According to this meaning, the true is the nature of the false, and the false is established based on the true. Though the false arises and ceases, the true neither increases nor decreases.
Furthermore, the *Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra* says: "Śrāvakas, after many kalpas, enter the realm of nirvāṇa, indulge in the wine of samādhi, and lie in a long drunken sleep. Later, they arise from that state and generate the great mind." The *Mahāyāna-saṃgraha* says: "They are transformed into śrāvakas; it is not truly so." Therefore, in the state of no remainder, both body and mind are extinguished.
聞所成地第十
The Tenth Stage: The Ground of Hearing and Accomplishment
上之九地辨三乘境,自下六地辨三乘行。初三通行,三乘皆能修三慧故;後三別行,應機隨法成自乘故。 又初三是方便行,後三根本行。 又初三所學行,後三所成行。聞謂聞慧,聞緣教故。以此為因,所成諸法,名聞所成。即以彼慧及相應法,并聞所緣若文若義,并所得果為此地體。前作意中,聞唯緣法者,少緣義故。 此地文分為三:初結前問後,標起論端;次問列五明處名;後隨別釋。
The nine higher stages distinguish the realms of the Three Vehicles; the six lower stages distinguish the practices of the Three Vehicles. The first three are common practices, as practitioners of all Three Vehicles can cultivate the three wisdoms; the latter three are distinct practices, tailored to individual capacities and methods to accomplish their respective vehicle. Moreover, the first three are preparatory practices, while the latter three are fundamental practices. Additionally, the first three are practices to be learned, and the latter three are practices to be accomplished. "Hearing" refers to the wisdom of hearing, which arises from encountering teachings. The dharmas accomplished based on this cause are called "accomplished through hearing." This stage takes as its essence that wisdom, its corresponding dharmas, the objects of hearing—whether words or meanings—and the resulting attainments. In the preceding stage of mental application, hearing primarily focuses on the dharmas, with only minor attention to their meanings. This stage is divided into three parts: first, concluding the previous and introducing the next, marking the beginning of the discussion; second, listing the names of the five fields of knowledge; and third, explaining each in detail.
「謂若略說,於五明處乃至讀誦憶念」者,有二釋,此顯於五明教所生聞慧。一云:謂以覺慧為先,聽聞後時,意地領受、讀誦及憶念等,方是聞慧。其五識初覺慧并聽聞,及俱意識聽聞、讀誦,是生得慧,不明了故。二云:覺慧為先者,是生得慧。若聽、若聞、若領受、若讀誦、若憶念,俱是聞慧。俱時五識雖非正聞慧,由從意地方便聞慧所引發故,因聞所成,明了心者,亦是聞慧;設雖意地領受、讀誦等,不明了者,皆生得慧。
Regarding the phrase, "To put it briefly, it means studying, reciting, and contemplating the five fields of knowledge," there are two interpretations. This indicates the wisdom of learning that arises from the teachings of the five fields of knowledge.
The first interpretation says: It means that with discernment as the starting point, after listening, the mind receives, recites, and contemplates—this constitutes the wisdom of learning. The initial discernment and listening through the five senses, along with the simultaneous mental consciousness that listens, recites, and contemplates, are innate wisdom, as they are not yet clear and distinct.
The second interpretation says: "With discernment as the starting point" refers to innate wisdom. Whether listening, hearing, receiving, reciting, or contemplating—all are part of the wisdom of learning. Although the simultaneous activity of the five senses is not the primary wisdom of learning, because it is guided and facilitated by the wisdom of learning arising from the mind, and because it is formed through listening, when the mind is clear and aware, it also counts as the wisdom of learning. Even if the mind receives, recites, or contemplates but remains unclear, it is still considered innate wisdom.
「又於依止名、句、文身義中無倒解了」者,謂於五明處義,覺慧為先,所起聞慧。
"Furthermore, to correctly understand the meaning based on names, phrases, and written expressions" refers to the wisdom gained through listening, which arises from discernment focused on the principles of the five fields of knowledge.
第三、別釋五明處中,初辨內明處,文有二:初標四門、後隨別釋。四門者:一、「事施設」者,謂三藏稱事施設建立。事謂事義,謂經、律、論義差別故。又是諸所詮義所依之體事,故立事名。 二、「想差別施設」者,謂能詮名,由名、句、文皆以想生,故名稱想。又西域呼名,多呼為想。又名等無體,隨聲假立,隨其想解,號為能詮,故說名等稱之為想。 三、「攝聖教義相」者,謂諸聖教所詮之義能攝聖教。 四、「由佛教所應知處相」者,謂從二數佛教所詮事,增益乃至十種佛教所詮事,名佛教所應知處相。第三以理攝教,第四以教顯理。「素怛攬」,云契經。「毘奈耶」,云調伏。「摩怛履迦」,云本母。集諸經義,論議明之,出生諸經,別所詮義,故名本母。即舊所云修多羅、毘尼、摩得勤伽。
Third, in the detailed explanation of the five fields of knowledge, the first is to clarify the field of inner knowledge. The text has two parts: first, outlining the four approaches; second, explaining each in detail.
The four approaches are:
1. **The Establishment of Phenomena**: This refers to the classification and establishment within the Three Baskets (Tripitaka) based on phenomena. Phenomena here mean the meanings and principles, differentiated as the meanings of the Sutras, Vinaya, and Abhidharma. Moreover, these are the foundational realities upon which the meanings are based, hence they are called phenomena.
2. **The Establishment of Conceptual Distinctions**: This refers to the designations that convey meaning. Since names, phrases, and texts all arise from conceptual thought, they are called conceptual designations. Also, in the Western Regions, names are often referred to as conceptual thought. Furthermore, names and such have no inherent substance; they are provisionally established based on sounds and are designated as conveyors of meaning according to one's conceptual understanding, hence they are called conceptual designations.
3. **The Characteristics That Encompass the Meaning of the Sacred Teachings**: This refers to the meanings conveyed by the sacred teachings, which encompass the teachings themselves.
4. **The Characteristics of What Should Be Known Through the Buddha’s Teachings**: This refers to the matters explained by the Buddha’s teachings, ranging from two types up to ten types, known as the characteristics of what should be known through the Buddha’s teachings. The third approach uses principles to encompass the teachings, while the fourth uses the teachings to reveal the principles.
- **Sūtra** (Sūtra) means "scripture that accords with the truth." - **Vinaya** means "discipline" or "taming." - **Mātṛkā** means "root mother." It collects the meanings of various scriptures, clarifies them through discussion, and gives rise to the distinct meanings explained in the scriptures, hence it is called the root mother. These correspond to the older terms: Sutra, Vinaya, and Matṛka.
想差別中,有四嗢柁南。初嗢柁南有十二門,第二嗢柁南有十四門,第三嗢柁南有九門,第四嗢柁南有十門。
Within the analysis of distinctions, there are four main sections. The first section contains twelve topics, the second section contains fourteen topics, the third section contains nine topics, and the fourth section contains ten topics.
「句謂六內處」等者,詮法自性,名名;詮法差別,稱句。今詮法差別,是故名句;以寬攝狹,名在其中。 無量境界,在十方處所,三世時分故,皆言無量。
The phrase "such as the six internal sense bases" refers to the nature of phenomena, which is called "name"; the distinctions among phenomena are called "phrase." Here, it explains the distinctions among phenomena, thus it is called "phrase." Since the broad encompasses the narrow, "name" is included within it.
Boundless realms exist in the ten directions of space and the three periods of time, therefore they are all described as boundless.
四眾中,唯明男子四眾,無鄔波斯迦。又鄔波斯迦,素迦所攝,俱從在家中戒為性故,別離出之。
Among the four assemblies, only the four assemblies of men are clearly mentioned, with no mention of female lay devotees. Furthermore, female lay devotees are included under the category of lay followers, as both are defined by the precepts taken while living at home, and are thus distinguished separately.
三十七道品、四沙門果、無諍、願智、六神通等,如〈聲聞地〉說。 大乘五事、四尋思、四如實智、三性、三無性,如〈決擇分〉釋。 四真實、五種大乘、五無量、不思議威德勝解等,如〈菩薩地〉釋。
The thirty-seven factors of enlightenment, the four fruits of the monastic path, the state of non-contention, the wisdom of aspiration, and the six supernatural powers are explained as in the "Chapter on the Hearers."
The five topics of the Great Vehicle, the four investigations, the four kinds of genuine wisdom, the three natures, and the three non-natures are explained as in the "Chapter on Analysis."
The four truths, the five aspects of the Great Vehicle, the five immeasurables, and the inconceivable majestic power of resolve are explained as in the "Chapter on the Bodhisattva Path."
「六內處境界」下十四門法,名聲聞地法。「大乘五事」下,有十四門功德,是大乘法。補特伽羅空、補特伽羅無我、法空性、法無我有差別者,空謂所空自性,無我謂無其用及差別義。又空謂二空理,無我謂所執。或翻此說,故二差別。
The fourteen sections of teachings following "The Six Inner Sense Fields and Their Objects" are known as the Śrāvaka Ground teachings. The fourteen sections of virtues following "The Five Matters of the Mahāyāna" belong to the Mahāyāna teachings.
Regarding the distinctions between "pudgala-śūnyatā" (emptiness of the person), "pudgala-anātman" (selflessness of the person), "dharma-śūnyatā" (emptiness of dharmas), and "dharma-anātman" (selflessness of dharmas): "Emptiness" refers to the nature of what is empty, while "selflessness" refers to the absence of function and distinguishing characteristics. Alternatively, "emptiness" refers to the principle of the two emptinesses, while "selflessness" refers to what is falsely grasped. These may also be interpreted conversely, hence the distinction between the two.
「五相大菩提」:「自性」者,《顯揚》第八云:謂過二乘所得轉依體。 「功能」者,謂十自在:一、壽;二、心;三、眾具;四、業;五、生;六、願;七、勝解;八、神力;九、智;十、法。 「方便」者,謂四種變化:一、現菩薩行變化,化根未熟者;二、現如來變化,化根已熟者;三、現攝聲聞變化;四、現調伏獨覺變化。「轉」者,有二:一、暫時,於諸有情未解脫成,如來教化,轉不體息;二、究竟,佛難思德,為諸有情作利益事,轉不休息。 「還」者,彼論名滅,還涅槃故。 此亦有二:一、暫時,於已解脫有情,佛暫示現入般涅槃;二、究竟,謂煩惱習氣及苦永滅。
"The Five Aspects of Great Enlightenment":
1. **Inherent Nature**: As stated in the *Xianyang Lun*, Chapter Eight, this refers to the transformed basis that surpasses what is attained by the Two Vehicles.
2. **Capabilities**: These refer to the Ten Masteries: * Mastery over lifespan. * Mastery over mind. * Mastery over requisites and provisions. * Mastery over karma. * Mastery over birth. * Mastery over aspiration. * Mastery over resolve. * Mastery over spiritual powers. * Mastery over wisdom. * Mastery over the Dharma.
3. **Skillful Means**: These refer to four kinds of transformations: * Manifesting the conduct of a Bodhisattva to transform those whose faculties are not yet mature. * Manifesting the form of a Tathagata (Buddha) to transform those whose faculties are mature. * Manifesting the form of a Sravaka (Disciple-Hearer) to gather and teach them. * Manifesting the form of a Pratyekabuddha (Solitary Realizer) to tame and teach them.
4. **Turning (the Wheel)**: This has two aspects: * **Temporary**: For sentient beings who have not yet attained liberation, the Tathagata teaches and turns the wheel of Dharma without cease. * **Ultimate**: The inconceivable virtues of a Buddha perform beneficial deeds for sentient beings, turning without cease.
5. **Return**: In that treatise, this is called "extinction," as it is the return to Nirvana. This also has two aspects: * **Temporary**: For sentient beings who have already attained liberation, the Buddha temporarily manifests entering Parinirvana. * **Ultimate**: This refers to the permanent extinction of afflictions, habitual tendencies, and suffering.
五種大乘中,《顯揚》第八云:種子者,即〈菩薩地種姓品〉;趣入者,即〈發心品〉;次第者,即〈住品〉;正行者,即餘諸品;正行果者,即〈大涅槃〉、〈建立品〉。「最初發心」,謂菩提心,由有種子;「悲愍有情」,是趣入菩提;「波羅蜜多」,是諸地次第;「攝眾生事」,是大乘正行;「自他相續成熟」,是正行果,二利果滿是佛德故。 又最初者,謂種子;發心者,謂趣入;悲愍有情者,謂次第;波羅蜜多,攝眾生事者,即正行;自他相續成熟者,謂正行果。此順〈菩薩地〉配品釋。
Among the five aspects of the Mahayana path, the *Xianyang Lun* (Chapter 8) states: - **"Seed"** corresponds to the "Chapter on Disposition" in the *Bodhisattva Grounds*. - **"Approach"** corresponds to the "Chapter on Generating the Aspiration." - **"Sequence"** corresponds to the "Chapter on Abiding." - **"Practice"** corresponds to the remaining chapters. - **"Fruit of Practice"** corresponds to the "Chapter on Great Nirvana" and the "Chapter on Establishment."
Thus: - **"The initial generation of the mind"** refers to the mind of enlightenment, which arises from the seed. - **"Compassion for sentient beings"** is the approach to enlightenment. - **"The perfections (pāramitās)"** constitute the sequence of stages. - **"Activities for benefiting beings"** are the practice of the Mahayana. - **"The maturation of oneself and others"** is the fruit of practice, as the fulfillment of both self-benefit and benefiting others constitutes the qualities of a Buddha.
Alternatively: - **"Initial"** refers to the seed. - **"Generation of the mind"** refers to the approach. - **"Compassion for sentient beings"** refers to the sequence. - **"The perfections and activities for benefiting beings"** refer to the practice. - **"The maturation of oneself and others"** refers to the fruit of practice.
This interpretation aligns with the chapter divisions of the *Bodhisattva Grounds*.
此文「七識住」,如初帙中解,第十四自有文。
This passage on the "Seven Stations of Consciousness" is explained in the first volume; the fourteenth volume contains its own dedicated text.
假設施中,初於法假立有情,後依圓成能取、所取相上假立諸法。
First, we provisionally establish the concept of a sentient being within the dharma. Later, based on the perfected nature, we provisionally establish all phenomena upon the appearances of a perceiver and the perceived.
「云何思擇?一行」者,《對法》第十五云:謂以一法與餘法一一互相問,除此法,更以第二法與餘法互相問,如是一一,一切當知。 「順前句」者,謂諸法中隨取二法更互相問,依止前法,以答所問,以狹問寬,順前句故。 「順後句」者,謂即二法展轉相問,依止後問,以答所問,以寬問狹,順後句故。一切狹體必即寬故,自有寬體非是狹故。或於所問,應二句答,應三句答,應四句答,此中從寬以明,唯說四句。體有覺狹,或不同故,寬狹義同,應述可答。不如理名無事答,亦名遮止答。其二十八對二門、五對三門等,皆如〈決擇分〉六十五、六、七、八等說。「四行迹法」,謂苦速通等。二文不同,至下當釋。
**How to Analyze? The "One-Line" Method** As stated in the *Abhidharma* Chapter 15: It means taking one principle and comparing it with each of the other principles one by one through questioning. After finishing with this principle, take a second principle and compare it with the others in the same way. Proceeding like this through all principles, one should understand.
**"Following the Former Clause"** This means taking any two principles among all principles and questioning them in relation to each other. The answer to the question is based on the former principle, because the question is narrow while the answer is broad, thus following the former clause.
**"Following the Latter Clause"** This means taking the same two principles and questioning them in reverse order. The answer to the question is based on the latter principle, because the question is broad while the answer is narrow, thus following the latter clause. All narrow entities are necessarily broad, but there are broad entities that are not narrow. Sometimes, in response to a question, one should answer with two clauses, three clauses, or four clauses. Here, for the sake of clarity, only the four-clause method is explained. Entities may be perceived as narrow or broad, or they may differ. When the meaning of broad and narrow is the same, one should answer accordingly. Answering contrary to reason is called an "unfounded answer" or a "blocking answer." The twenty-eight pairs of two categories and the five pairs of three categories, etc., are all explained in the *Analysis Section*, Chapters 65, 66, 67, 68, etc.
**"The Four Paths of Practice"** Refers to the path of suffering, the path of swift liberation, etc. The two texts differ on this, which will be explained below.
「四法迹」,謂三學迹,即無貪、無瞋、正念。正定三種繫屬,初根互相屬、次識根互相屬、後根境互相屬。
The "Four Dharma Traces" refer to the traces of the three trainings: non-greed, non-hatred, and right mindfulness. Right concentration has three kinds of connections: first, the mutual connection of the faculties; next, the mutual connection of consciousness and the faculties; and finally, the mutual connection of the faculties and their objects.
「十六種攝」,如〈決擇分〉五十四及《對法》第五中說。
The "Sixteen Methods of Guidance" are explained in the Fifty-Fourth Chapter of the *Analysis Section* and the Fifth Chapter of the *Abhidharma*.
五相應,亦如《對法》第五、〈決擇〉五十四說。
The five correspondences are also explained in the *Abhidharma-samuccaya*, Chapter 5, "Analysis," Section 54.
見聞覺知,《瑜伽》第三、九十三、《對法》第一等,釋見聞覺知義。《顯揚》第十八說:色界無覺,後起言說;無色都無,謂生彼界故,無彼後言說。
Seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing — as explained in the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra*, Volume 3, Section 93, and the *Abhidharma-samuccaya*, Volume 1, among others — clarify the meanings of these terms. The *Xianyang Lun*, in its eighteenth chapter, states: In the realm of form, there is no sensory perception, yet speech arises afterward. In the formless realm, there is none at all — because beings born there lack the subsequent capacity for speech.
六種次第:「流轉次第」者,謂嬰姟等十時流轉次第,或十二因緣次第。 「成所作次第」者,謂出家受具,修七方便,得見道等。 「宣說次第」者,謂四正斷,一剎那中具其四用以辨次第,非四現行前後有異,或宣說諸法,標釋次第。 「生起次第」者,謂十時分,芽莖等生起次第。 「現觀次第」者,謂真、相見道前後,六十三等現觀前後次第。 「等至」者,謂九次第定。
Six Types of Sequence:
1. **The Sequence of Cyclic Existence**: This refers to the sequential flow of the ten stages of life, from infancy to old age, or the sequence of the twelve links of dependent origination.
2. **The Sequence of Accomplishing Tasks**: This refers to the sequence of leaving home, receiving full ordination, cultivating the seven preparatory practices, and attaining the Path of Seeing, and so forth.
3. **The Sequence of Exposition**: This refers to the Four Right Efforts. In a single instant, all four functions are complete, establishing their sequence, not because they manifest one after another. Alternatively, it refers to the sequence of first stating a topic and then explaining it when expounding the teachings.
4. **The Sequence of Arising**: This refers to the sequential arising across ten time periods, like a sprout, stem, and so forth growing in order.
5. **The Sequence of Direct Realization**: This refers to the sequential order of the sixty-three types of direct realization before and after the True and Illusory Paths of Seeing.
6. **The Sequence of Meditative Attainments**: This refers to the nine successive meditative absorptions.
「八種所作」:一、「滅依止」者,能與滅惡為依止。「轉」,謂與善生為依止。 「遍知」,謂知善巧,遍知苦、集緣生等法,生厭離故。 「喜樂」者,謂喜樂滅、道。
"The Eight Kinds of Accomplishment":
1. "The Support for Cessation" means providing the basis for eliminating evil. "Transformation" means providing the basis for the arising of good. "Thorough Understanding" refers to skillful knowledge, fully comprehending suffering, its origin, dependent arising, and other teachings, thereby giving rise to renunciation. "Joy and Delight" means rejoicing in cessation and the path.
「所緣有四」等者,《對法》第十一:遍滿所緣有四,謂有分別影像、無分別影像、事邊際、所作成熟所緣;二、淨行所緣有五,謂多貪、多瞋、多癡、憍慢、尋思,五種觀行差別;三、善巧所緣有五,謂蘊、界、處、緣起、處非處善巧所緣;四、淨惑所緣有三,謂麁靜等相、真如、四聖諦。
"Regarding the statement 'There are four types of objects of meditation,' the *Abhidharma-samuccaya* (Chapter 11) explains:
First, the **universal objects of meditation** are fourfold: 1. The object with conceptualization, 2. The object without conceptualization, 3. The object of the ultimate reality of phenomena, 4. The object of accomplishing the goal.
Second, the **objects for purifying conduct** are fivefold, corresponding to the five types of practitioners: 1. Those with strong attachment, 2. Those with strong aversion, 3. Those with strong ignorance, 4. Those with strong pride, 5. Those with excessive discursive thought.
Third, the **objects of skillful understanding** are fivefold: 1. The aggregates, 2. The elements, 3. The sense bases, 4. Dependent origination, 5. The distinction between what is appropriate and inappropriate.
Fourth, the **objects for purifying afflictions** are threefold: 1. The characteristics of coarseness and tranquility, 2. Suchness (ultimate reality), 3. The Four Noble Truths.
「四種、九種瑜伽」,下〈聲聞地〉、《對法》第九等說。「方便瑜伽」,以作意、勝解、慧為性。
The "Four and Nine Types of Yoga" are explained below in the "Śrāvaka-bhūmi" and in the ninth chapter of the "Abhidharma," among other texts. "Skillful Yoga" is characterized by attention, superior understanding, and wisdom.
「三事觀」者,「有相」謂所緣事,「尋、思」是能緣事。
The "Threefold Observation" refers to: "appearance" is the object of observation, while "investigation" and "analysis" are the acts of observing.
「四行觀」,如《對法》第九及〈聲聞地〉說。
The "Four Practices of Contemplation" are explained in the ninth chapter of the *Abhidharma-samuccaya* and in the *Śrāvakabhūmi* section.
六事差別所緣觀:一、者,苦無常等差別義,在見道前方便。 二、「事」者,謂諸事作用,集有生苦有因等。 「相」者,謂滅諦體相。 「品」者,謂諸法上中下品,或三乘道諦有品類故。次上三種在見道位。 「時」者,在修道,在見道後時而起故,或觀三世。 「道理」者,謂在無學道。 或事者,蘊界處等。時者,三世。道理,謂四種道理。
Six Aspects of Contemplation on Different Objects:
First, contemplating the meanings of suffering, impermanence, and other distinctions serves as preparation before the Path of Seeing.
Second, "phenomena" refers to the functions and activities of all things, such as the arising of suffering and its causes. "Characteristics" refers to the nature of the truth of cessation. "Categories" refers to the superior, middling, and inferior qualities of all dharmas, or the different categories of the Path of Truth for the three vehicles. These three aspects belong to the stage of the Path of Seeing.
"Time" refers to the stage of cultivation, arising after the Path of Seeing, or contemplating the three periods of time. "Principle" refers to the stage of the path of no more learning. Alternatively, "phenomena" may refer to the aggregates, sense bases, and elements. "Time" refers to the three periods of time. "Principle" refers to the four kinds of reasoning.
「五種教授」者:一、「教教授」,授與教法。 二、「證教授」,授與理法。 三、「次第教授」,授觀行法門。四、「無倒教授」,授前三種,應機無亂。 五、神「變教授」,授與神通,令化眾生。
The "Five Methods of Instruction" are:
1. **Instruction in Doctrine**: Imparting the teachings. 2. **Instruction in Realization**: Imparting the underlying principles. 3. **Instruction in Sequence**: Imparting the methods of contemplation and practice. 4. **Instruction Without Error**: Imparting the first three methods appropriately, without confusion, according to the student's capacity. 5. **Instruction Through Spiritual Power**: Imparting spiritual abilities to transform sentient beings.
內明處四種相中,第三大段明攝聖教義相中有十法五對:初、能作所作,二俱善法;次、過患染污,苦、集諦法;三、有障有順,謂煩惱、善法;四、有真有勝,無為、有為諸無漏法;五、有順有得,謂世間、出世間法。 「應習」,謂善法。 「應斷」,謂染污法。 「斷已現行」,謂無覆無記法。
Within the third major section on the meaning of gathering the sacred teachings among the four aspects of inner knowledge, there are ten dharmas forming five pairs:
First, that which acts and that which is acted upon—both are wholesome dharmas. Next, faults and defilements—these are the dharmas of suffering and its origin. Third, that which obstructs and that which assists—namely, afflictions and wholesome dharmas. Fourth, that which is true and that which is superior—namely, unconditioned dharmas and all conditioned dharmas that are without outflows. Fifth, that which conforms and that which is attained—namely, worldly and world‑transcending dharmas.
“What should be cultivated” refers to wholesome dharmas. “What should be abandoned” refers to defiled dharmas. “What, having been abandoned, still manifests” refers to non‑obscuring neutral dharmas.
第四大段明佛教所應知處相中有二:初增十法門、後結之。初即為十段。初明三種一有情,即住有三。要依有情,方有情非情、因及果、染與淨、生死涅槃、有為無為等增二門所明諸法故。 初明三種一有情。增二法門,有二十四對。 「於如來所說所有甚深經」者,謂《解深密》等三性顯了教。 「相似甚深空相應經」者,謂《般若》等與此甚深經相似。 「緣性」者,圓成性。 「緣起」者,依他性。 「又有二法,能令有情內正作意、外聞他音」等者,此內作意、外聞他音是二因緣,由二法故,令此二因緣現入現觀,當諸根熟。
The fourth major section clarifies the aspects one should understand regarding the Buddha's teachings, divided into two parts: first, expanding upon ten Dharma topics, and then summarizing them. The first part consists of ten segments. The first segment explains the three types of sentient beings, which correspond to the three realms of existence. It is based on sentient beings that distinctions such as sentient vs. non-sentient, cause and effect, defilement and purity, samsara and nirvana, conditioned and unconditioned phenomena, and other topics discussed in the expanded two-fold Dharma topics arise.
The first segment explains the three types of sentient beings. The expanded two-fold Dharma topics consist of twenty-four pairs.
"Regarding all the profound sutras spoken by the Tathagata" refers to teachings such as the *Samdhinirmocana Sutra*, which clearly elucidate the three natures.
"Similar profound sutras corresponding to emptiness" refers to teachings such as the *Prajnaparamita Sutras*, which resemble these profound sutras.
"Nature of dependent arising" refers to the perfected nature.
"Dependent arising" refers to the dependent nature.
"Furthermore, there are two methods that enable sentient beings to internally reflect rightly and externally listen to the teachings of others" means that internal reflection and external listening to teachings are two causes and conditions. Through these two methods, these two causes and conditions manifest, leading to direct insight and realization when the faculties are mature.
第十四卷
Volume Fourteen
增三,有四十五門。 「言十相者,謂壞生命」等者,上一壞字貫通下十。雜穢語名壞。 「所為事業」者,於正事業,不正而說,名綺語故。 前之七種,作業毀壞者,外彰身語而作業名。其次二種,意樂壞者,無貪無瞋,正意樂故。最後一種,方便壞者,正見乃是正智因故。「言三根者」,謂貪、瞋、邪見。此說十業,三為加行,隨應為究竟。或此偏明意三業道。
The third section on increase has forty-five categories.
Regarding "the ten characteristics, namely, destroying life," etc., the word "destroying" at the beginning applies to all ten that follow. Impure speech is called "destroying."
"As for 'activities undertaken,'" refers to speaking improperly about proper activities, which is why it is called frivolous speech.
The first seven types are termed "destruction of actions" because they manifest externally through body and speech in the performance of actions. The next two types are termed "destruction of intention" because they lack proper intention, being without greed or hatred. The final type is termed "destruction of means" because right view is the cause of right wisdom.
Regarding "the three roots," they are greed, hatred, and wrong view. These ten actions are explained with the three as the preparatory stages, and as appropriate, as the culmination. Alternatively, this specifically clarifies the three mental paths of action.
第二門,文分為二:初明三法,令不護根;後因前辨內法四種。欲貪為因,生死增長,名邪法種。 「依四處所」者:一、自身利等四種白法;二、怨;三、中;四、親。 「四白品」者,謂利、譽、稱、樂。四黑品者,衰、毀、譏、苦。一、於己利等生欲尋思,希獲不失故;於怨、中品生恚尋思,乃至欲令彼命斷故;於親友品生害尋思,但損惱故。 《婆須密論》第二卷利、衰二種,若依有情,以十七界、十一處、五蘊為性,除聲,疎不成質故;若於非情,以四界、四處、一蘊為體,如前除聲。 依《鞞婆沙》,十八界、十二處、五蘊為體;依非情,六界、六處為體,五塵及四相故。 依經部師《俱舍論》,說衰無別體,失物名衰故。今依能失者以辨衰體,以十八界為性。翻此,利體亦十八界。稱、譽、毀、譏,《婆須密論》體皆是聲,薩婆多師說名、句、文,今合以聲、名、句、文為體。 苦樂二種,體即是受,如《佛地論》,雖辨其相,而不出體。
**Second Section, Divided into Two Parts:** First, explaining the three factors that cause one to fail in guarding the senses; later, based on the previous discussion, distinguishing four types of internal conditions. Desire and craving serve as the cause, leading to the growth of birth and death, which is called the seed of unwholesome states.
**"Based on four spheres" refers to:** 1. Four kinds of wholesome qualities pertaining to oneself: gain, honor, praise, and pleasure; 2. Enemies; 3. Neutral persons; 4. Friends and loved ones.
**The four wholesome categories** are: gain, honor, praise, and pleasure. The four unwholesome categories are: loss, disgrace, blame, and suffering. First, regarding one's own gain and so forth, thoughts of desire arise, wishing to obtain and not lose them. Regarding enemies and neutral persons, thoughts of ill-will arise, even to the extent of wishing for their death. Regarding friends and loved ones, thoughts of harm arise, merely wishing to cause them distress.
According to the *Vasumitra Treatise*, Volume Two, the two categories of gain and loss, if based on sentient beings, take as their nature the seventeen elements, eleven sense bases, and five aggregates, excluding sound, as sound is too subtle and lacks substantial form. If based on non-sentient things, they take as their nature the four elements, four sense bases, and one aggregate, excluding sound as before.
According to the *Vibhāṣā*, they take as their nature the eighteen elements, twelve sense bases, and five aggregates. Regarding non-sentient things, they take as their nature the six elements and six sense bases, due to the five sense objects and the four characteristics.
According to the Sautrāntika school's *Abhidharmakośa*, it is said that loss has no separate substance, as loss is merely the name for losing things. Here, based on that which causes loss, the substance of loss is discussed, taking the eighteen elements as its nature. Conversely, the substance of gain is also the eighteen elements.
Praise, honor, disgrace, and blame, according to the *Vasumitra Treatise*, are all essentially sound. The Sarvāstivāda masters say they are name, phrase, and syllable. Here, they are combined, taking sound, name, phrase, and syllable as their substance.
The two categories of suffering and pleasure are essentially feeling, as explained in the *Buddhabhūmi Treatise*. Although their characteristics are distinguished, their substance is not separately identified.
「煩惱趣」者,能趣果故,即是三求,欲、有、邪梵行求之所因起。
"Distressful Path" refers to that which leads to consequences; it is the cause from which the three cravings arise: craving for sensual pleasures, craving for existence, and craving for wrong spiritual practices.
三種無明中皆言前際者,發業無明,名為前際;而觸、受俱能起愛、取,潤生無明,名為後際。
Among the three kinds of ignorance, when it says "past" in each case, the ignorance that initiates action is called the "past." However, contact and feeling together can give rise to craving and grasping, and the ignorance that nourishes rebirth is called the "future."
「又有三相,能攝一切色法自相」等者,此有二釋。一云:此三種色總攝一切色盡: 一、有見有對,謂顯、形、表是。此中,表名作用者,作表示用故。 二、無見有對色,謂五根、餘四塵色,論云「於自處所障礙餘色」等下是。總結上二色,言「當知一切總有十色」。 三、無見無對色,故云「及定地色」。今明三色屬自身者,故唯說彼。 「修方便者所有諸色」,即是內化心境,亦是未滿化心果。若正通果所變化色,亦屬他人,故此不說。又若得淨定,是通果色。 修方便者,是彼因色。彼通果色,即內化心境。彼方便色,即未滿化心果,境是心果故。二云:三相者,唯色處中顯、形、表三,最勝偏說。 於自處所障礙餘色等者,乘前彼明十一種色。
"Furthermore, there are three characteristics that encompass all forms of matter in their essential nature" – this statement has two interpretations.
First interpretation: These three types of form encompass all forms completely: 1. Visible and obstructive forms – these refer to color, shape, and movement. Here, "movement" is called "function" because it serves to express intention. 2. Invisible yet obstructive forms – these refer to the five sense faculties and the remaining four sense objects (excluding visible forms). As the treatise states, "they obstruct other forms within their own domain," etc. These two categories are summarized by saying, "Know that altogether there are ten forms." 3. Invisible and non-obstructive forms – hence the mention "and the forms of meditative states." Now, when clarifying that these three types of form pertain to one's own body, only those are discussed. "The forms possessed by those cultivating skillful means" refers to the inner transformation of mind and its objects, which is also the incomplete result of transformative mind. If it concerns the actual transformed forms resulting from spiritual powers, these also belong to others, so they are not discussed here. Moreover, if one attains purified concentration, these are forms resulting from spiritual powers. Those cultivating skillful means – these are the causal forms for that. Those forms resulting from spiritual powers are the inner transformation of mind and its objects. Those forms of skillful means are the incomplete result of transformative mind, since objects are the result of mind.
Second interpretation: The three characteristics refer specifically to the three most prominent aspects within the realm of visible forms – color, shape, and movement – which are emphasized for discussion. "As for obstructing other forms within their own domain," etc. – this follows from the previous explanation of the eleven types of form.
三欲中,「多用功力依緣諸欲,謂現前住所有諸欲」者,下四欲天欲,多依現前諸欲生起,用功念想,方從彼生。或復由業異熟,用功方治成熟故。
Among the three types of desires, "the desire that arises through effort and dependence on conditions, referring to desires that are present and manifest" describes the desires of the lower four desire heavens. These desires mostly arise from what is immediately present and manifest. Through effort and deliberate thought, they are generated from those conditions. Alternatively, they may also arise as a result of karmic ripening, requiring effort to cultivate and bring to maturity.
三眼者,色為二,非色為一。法眼亦入慧中,同非色故。此明三乘因果同有,不說佛眼。《莊嚴經》說有十眼。如《法華經.方便品》疏。
The three eyes are: two are of form, and one is formless. The Dharma Eye is also included within the Wisdom Eye, as both are formless. This clarifies that the causes and effects of the Three Vehicles are shared, but the Buddha Eye is not discussed here. The *Ornamented Sutra* speaks of ten eyes, as explained in the commentary on the "Expedient Means" chapter of the *Lotus Sutra*.
「又三種心一境性,能令證得如實智見」者,如其次第,即初習業、已習行、已超度三種作意相應定。 又初是聞、思慧,第二、修慧,世間三慧相應定也;第三、超度者,無分別智相應定也。又聞、思、修相應等持,能生無漏真智見故。行謂能緣,相謂境體,行所行相,故名行相。此通無漏等持義釋,無分別智無行相故。或行解相狀,故名行相。此依有漏三慧位定釋。
"Furthermore, the three types of single-pointed concentration of mind enable one to attain true wisdom and insight" — in order, these correspond to the three types of meditative absorption: initial practice, established practice, and surpassing practice.
The first is associated with the wisdom of hearing and reflection, the second with the wisdom of cultivation, and both correspond to worldly wisdom. The third, the surpassing practice, is associated with the concentration of non-conceptual wisdom.
Moreover, the meditative absorption aligned with hearing, reflection, and cultivation gives rise to the true, unconditioned wisdom and insight.
Here, "activity" refers to the subject that cognizes, and "characteristics" refer to the object itself. The activity of cognizing characteristics is thus called "activity-characteristics." This explanation applies to the unconditioned meditative absorption, as non-conceptual wisdom has no activity-characteristics.
Alternatively, "activity-characteristics" can refer to the process of understanding and the form of phenomena. This explanation applies to the conditioned meditative absorption associated with the three types of worldly wisdom.
「不淨生處超越因故」者,三惡趣、八無暇,名不淨生處。身語意三淨業,名超彼因。
"Transcending the causes of impure rebirths" means that the three lower realms and the eight unfavorable conditions are called impure rebirths. Purifying one's actions of body, speech, and mind is called transcending their causes.
「三牟尼業」者,即三善業。
The "Three Munī Deeds" refer to the three wholesome actions.
「謂由他所誹毀乃至所起慚、愧及愛敬」者,於他所誹毀生愧,顧他羞恥故;於自所誹毀生慚,顧他羞恥故。退失大利,深識因緣,倍生慚信,名為愛敬。即於三寶無愛敬故,名失大利。或於三處,各能起三,不須別配。
"When it is said, 'due to being slandered by others, and even the arising of shame, remorse, and reverence'—this means that shame arises from being slandered by others, because one feels disgrace in the eyes of others; remorse arises from slandering oneself, because one feels disgrace in the eyes of others. Losing great benefit, deeply recognizing the causes and conditions, one's shame and faith multiply, which is called reverence. Lacking reverence for the Three Jewels is called losing great benefit. Alternatively, in these three situations, each can give rise to the three, without needing to assign them separately."
「三種最勝無上」者:一、智無上,謂三智中,無我智為根本,初二智為方便,由此三入諦觀故偏說;二、行無上,謂四行跡;三、解脫無上,謂不動心解脫,於世間出世間解脫、有學無學解脫、時解脫,其不動心解脫最無上故。
"Three Supreme and Unsurpassable Qualities" refers to:
First, the unsurpassable wisdom. Among the three wisdoms, the wisdom of selflessness is fundamental, while the first two wisdoms serve as skillful means. It is emphasized because these three lead to the contemplation of truth.
Second, the unsurpassable practice, which refers to the four paths of practice.
Third, the unsurpassable liberation, which is the liberation of the unshakable mind. Among worldly and transcendent liberation, liberation of learners and non-learners, and liberation attained in time, the liberation of the unshakable mind is the most supreme.
增四門中,有四十六門,亦有相違為一門故。
Within the four additional categories, there are forty-six subcategories, which also include one category of contradictions.
「念住」者,體即是慧,由相應念,慧方住境故。
Mindfulness is the essence of wisdom. It is through the corresponding awareness that wisdom can abide in its object.
「四種縛」者,拘礙其心,故名為縛。非必要是煩惱縛性,由心依執身為自體,身便縛心;由心俱受,深領所緣,便縛俱心;由心了別色等為境界,所了別境乃拘於心。即由如別身等三法相應煩惱俱染惱心,故名為縛。觀四為境,深生厭患,立四念住。所依內身縛能依心,能緣俱受五分位別常與心俱,所了境界縛能了心,及諸煩惱雜染俱心,故立四縛。
The "Four Fetters" are called fetters because they bind and obstruct the mind. They are not necessarily the nature of afflictive fetters themselves, but rather:
1. When the mind clings to the body as its self, the body then fetters the mind. 2. When the mind experiences sensations and deeply grasps their objects, these sensations then fetter the mind. 3. When the mind perceives forms and other objects as its realm, these perceived objects then bind the mind. 4. When afflictions arise in connection with these three—body, sensations, and objects—they disturb and torment the mind, and so are called fetters.
By contemplating these four as objects of meditation, one develops deep aversion and weariness toward them, thus establishing the Four Foundations of Mindfulness.
Therefore, the four fetters are established as: - The inner body, which is relied upon, fetters the mind that relies on it. - The accompanying sensations, which actively perceive, constantly accompany the mind in their various aspects. - The perceived objects fetter the perceiving mind. - And the various afflictions disturb the mind in conjunction with them.
「又有四種欲勤為先乃至能得善法,及能增長」者,即四正斷。 「現行諸不善法」者,是律儀斷。「及斷彼繫」者,謂斷斷,未生惡法名彼繫故。「能得善法」,謂修習斷。 「及能增長」,謂防護斷。
"Furthermore, there are four kinds of diligence that lead to the attainment of wholesome states and their growth"—these refer to the Four Right Efforts.
"Present unwholesome states" refers to the effort to abandon unwholesome states that have already arisen.
"And to cut off their ties" refers to the effort to prevent unwholesome states that have not yet arisen from arising—these are called their ties.
"To attain wholesome states" refers to the effort to cultivate wholesome states that have not yet arisen.
"And to promote their growth" refers to the effort to maintain wholesome states that have already arisen.
「又有四種心定心住」者,簡別散地,名心定;內住一境,名心住。
"Moreover, there are four kinds of settled mind and abiding mind" — this distinguishes them from a scattered state; settling the mind is called 'mind settled,' while inwardly abiding in a single state is called 'mind abiding.'
「四種想為先戲論縛」者,依七有想,故除有頂、捨無量。
"Four kinds of conceptual play as the basis for entanglement" means that based on the seven realms of existence, one excludes the highest realm of formlessness and abandons the immeasurable states.
唯言除欲貪者,同《大智度論》,如第十二卷會。
The statement "only to eliminate desire and greed" aligns with the *Mahāprajñāpāramitā Śāstra*, as explained in its twelfth volume.
「通有漏無漏他心差別智」者,有漏他心智不知無漏心,亦不知彼能緣自證分等,不知彼能知智,謂自心不自見故。無漏他心智能知有漏無漏心,亦知能知智。佛智後三分通能知自故,然未必作道四行,亦未必通餘人。
"The wisdom that comprehends both mundane and transcendent minds of others" refers to the fact that mundane mind-reading wisdom cannot perceive transcendent minds, nor can it perceive the self-aware aspect of those minds, or the wisdom that knows them—because one's own mind cannot see itself. Transcendent mind-reading wisdom can perceive both mundane and transcendent minds, and also knows the wisdom that perceives them. The Buddha's wisdom, through its three subsequent aspects, is capable of knowing itself, yet it does not necessarily engage in the four contemplations of the path, nor does it necessarily extend to the minds of others.
「又有四法,能盡上漏」等者,有三說:一云即四法跡,於七方便、見道、修道、無學道中能盡上漏為足跡故。二云四跡者:一、得有漏慧,即七方便;二、見道位已,缺諸煩惱及業果事;三、修道位,無餘永斷諸煩惱事;四、無學道,無餘永斷諸煩惱事,如所得道,轉更修習。諸煩惱事通上三處,除有漏慧。三云一、有漏慧,是加行道;二、缺諸煩惱,無間道;三、缺諸事,解脫道,除諸麁重及果法故;四、為無餘斷諸煩惱事故,如先所得,轉更修習,是勝進道。
"There are four methods that can exhaust the higher defilements" — there are three explanations:
First explanation: These are the four tracks. They serve as tracks in the seven preparatory stages, the path of seeing, the path of cultivation, and the path of no-more-learning, because they can exhaust the higher defilements.
Second explanation: The four tracks are: 1. Acquiring conditioned wisdom — the seven preparatory stages; 2. After entering the path of seeing, cutting off afflictions and the activities and results of karma; 3. In the path of cultivation, completely and permanently severing all afflictive activities; 4. In the path of no-more-learning, completely and permanently severing all afflictive activities, and further cultivating the path as previously attained. Afflictive activities apply to the above three stages, excluding conditioned wisdom.
Third explanation: 1. Conditioned wisdom is the preparatory path; 2. Cutting off afflictions is the uninterrupted path; 3. Cutting off activities is the liberation path, eliminating coarse habits and resultant phenomena; 4. For the sake of completely severing all afflictive activities, further cultivating as previously attained is the path of advancement.
「又有四護」:一、「命護」者,不惜身命護持正法,或護他命根而不損壞,或護自正命不起惡業。二、「力護」者,謂護智慧摧眾魔怨,或護身力為利益他,或護五力摧怨不屈。 「心煩惱護」者,護諸煩惱不染污心,為護正法起諸煩惱,驅遣惡人壞正法者。 「正方便護」者,善巧方便習行正法。
"Furthermore, there are four kinds of protection: First, 'Protection of Life' means not sparing one's own life to uphold the true Dharma, or protecting the life-force of others without harming it, or guarding one's own righteous livelihood so as not to give rise to evil deeds. Second, 'Protection of Strength' means protecting wisdom to vanquish all demonic adversaries, or protecting physical strength for the benefit of others, or safeguarding the five powers to overcome enemies without yielding. 'Protection from Mental Afflictions' means guarding against afflictions so they do not defile the mind, while also using afflictions to protect the true Dharma by driving away evil people who would destroy it. 'Protection through Right Means' means skillfully and wisely practicing the true Dharma."
「又有四種能得正見乃至專注一緣」者,於境不順,不貪也;於境不違,不瞋也;正知而行,不癡也。此之三種行,緣諸境行正行時清淨。專注一緣,正念也,後一種住時清淨也。
"Furthermore, there are four ways to attain right view and even to focus single-pointedly."
When encountering objects, not being attached—this is non-greed. When encountering objects, not being averse—this is non-hatred. Acting with clear awareness—this is non-delusion. These three practices purify one's actions when engaging with objects.
Focusing single-pointedly is right mindfulness—this last practice purifies one's state of abiding.
「又由四行能證明及解脫」者:一、念;二、眼;三、慧;四、身。宿命明、天眼明、及二解脫漏盡,如次能證。身,即五蘊四蘊之身。
"Furthermore, the four practices that can lead to realization and liberation are: first, mindfulness; second, vision; third, wisdom; and fourth, the body. The knowledge of past lives, the divine eye, and the two liberations—the destruction of defilements—are achieved in that order. The body refers to the body composed of the five aggregates or the four aggregates."
「四者、輕等動性」者,謂風能造與所造輕相似,故名輕等。由風性動故,名輕等動性。又有諸部立作意數以為動性,今言與輕相似,風性能動,非作意也。
Fourth, "lightness and mobility" means that wind, as a creative element, shares a quality of lightness with the things it creates, which is why it is called "lightness." Because wind has a nature of movement, it is called "lightness and mobility." Some schools also posit that mental attention constitutes the nature of movement. Here, it is said that wind shares the quality of lightness and has the ability to move, but this is not due to mental attention.
四法能住有情,謂四食。
Four things sustain living beings: these are the four kinds of nourishment.
四法為識足跡,謂四識住。 「見已趣向」,五根色。 「取為所緣」,六境色。 「所依、境界俱有」,如次配根、五塵法處。
Four Dharmas are the footprints of consciousness, known as the four stations of consciousness. "Seeing and then proceeding toward" refers to the five sense faculties and form. "Taking as the object" refers to the six sense objects and form. "Having both basis and object" corresponds, in order, to the faculties, the five sense objects, and the dharmas of the sense-sphere.
「四問記論」者,謂一向記等四論。人四記者,於法實相,如問如來法身是真覺性等,應一向記,言爾顯了;問人果勝劣,應分別記,望天為劣,望餘為勝;隱密非顯了問義,亦非一向門,問人勝劣,應詰問記,汝何所方,如是展轉觀彼曲意,返詰無窮;問實有情作者、受者,應捨置記。 法四記者,於法實相,問真如常耶,應一向記;問諸有情身中業果,其異熟當定生耶,潤惑盡者異熟不生,潤惑未盡者異熟當生;觀其諂意,問請說法,但應返問,不應開釋;問蘊實法當為有無耶,應捨置記。記謂記別,記別解脫故。
The "Four Methods of Responding" refer to the four approaches of answering questions: the direct answer, the analytical answer, the counter-question, and the set-aside answer.
Regarding the four methods for questions about persons: When asked about the true nature of reality—such as whether the Dharma-body of the Tathāgata is the true awakened nature—one should give a direct answer, affirming it clearly. When asked about the superiority or inferiority of a person's attainment, one should give an analytical answer: compared to heavenly beings, it may be inferior; compared to others, it may be superior. When the question is obscure, not clearly stated, and not suitable for a direct answer—such as asking about a person's superiority or inferiority—one should respond with a counter-question: "From what perspective are you asking?" In this way, through back-and-forth questioning, one observes the underlying intent and avoids endless debate. When asked about whether there truly exists a self that acts or experiences, one should set the question aside without answering.
Regarding the four methods for questions about phenomena: When asked about the true nature of reality—such as whether suchness is eternal—one should give a direct answer. When asked whether the karmic results in sentient beings' bodies will definitely manifest as ripening, one should give an analytical answer: for those whose defilements have been exhausted, the ripening will not arise; for those whose defilements remain, the ripening will arise. When sensing deceitful intent in a request to teach the Dharma, one should respond with a counter-question rather than expound. When asked whether the aggregates truly exist or not, one should set the question aside without answering.
"Responding" here means to clarify and distinguish, thereby clarifying the path to liberation.
「四種攝眾方便」者,即四攝事:布施、愛語、利行、同事。如次配之。
The "four ways to gather and benefit beings" are the four means of attraction: generosity, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared purpose. They correspond in that order.
四死,如前第五卷解。
The four kinds of death are explained as in the previous Volume Five.
復有四清淨道:一、「非功用根圓滿」等者,此即四行跡,謂苦遲通、苦速通、樂遲通、樂速通。如次配之。鈍根名遲,利根名速。未至及無色地名苦,定慧一偏故;根本靜慮名樂,雙道轉故。雖未至地名有喜樂,未圓滿故,但名為苦。「功用根」者,謂練根也。然〈菩薩地〉依凡聖差別,與此不同,及至〈聲聞地〉當辨。
Furthermore, there are four paths of purification: The first, "non-exertion of perfected faculties," refers to the four practices: the painful slow path, the painful swift path, the pleasant slow path, and the pleasant swift path. These are matched accordingly. Dull faculties are called "slow," sharp faculties are called "swift." The preparatory stages and the formless realms are called "painful" because concentration and wisdom are imbalanced; the fundamental meditative absorptions are called "pleasant" because both paths operate together. Although the preparatory stages are said to have joy and bliss, they are not yet fully perfected, so they are only called "painful." "Exertion of faculties" refers to the cultivation of faculties. However, the "Bodhisattva Bhūmi" distinguishes between ordinary beings and saints differently from this, and this will be clarified in the "Śrāvaka Bhūmi."
「一、樂而非利益」等者,生死饒益名樂,出世饒益名利等,義差別准知。
"One: Pleasure but not benefit" refers to the fact that worldly enjoyments are called pleasure, while the benefits of transcending the world are called benefit and so on. The distinctions in meaning should be understood accordingly.
謂國王及祠祀王馬祠祀者,其諸國王恒懷憂懼討怨敵等,能令自他俱任苦故。其祠祀主雖極自在,自殺馬等以為祠祀,能令自他俱苦非福。
The kings and those who perform horse sacrifices—the kings are constantly filled with worry and fear, waging war against enemies, causing suffering for both themselves and others. The masters of sacrifice, though they hold great power, slaughter horses and other beings in their rituals, bringing suffering and misfortune upon both themselves and others.
四種語失者,謂虛誑、離間、麁惡、雜穢。
Four kinds of faulty speech: lying, divisive talk, harsh words, and idle chatter.
增五門中,有二十四門。 「五種失利養因行」等者,即《成實論》所說五慳。 「若於是處受用利養」,即是處慳。 「若從彼得」者,即是家慳,亦名施主慳。 「若所得物」者,即施物慳。 「若所為得」者,即稱讚慳。 「若如是得」者,謂法慳。 住處慳者,獨我住此,不用餘人;設有餘人,我恒為主。 家慳者,獨我有此家,不用餘人入;設有餘人來,於中我最勝。 施物慳者,我獨取此物,不用與餘人;設與餘,我獨多勝。 稱讚慳者,獨稱讚我,勿讚餘人;設讚餘人,勿令勝我。 法慳者,獨我能知諸經教義,勿令餘知;設有能知,皆疎於我。
Within the five additional categories, there are twenty-four subcategories. "The five kinds of conduct that lead to loss of offerings" refers to the five types of stinginess mentioned in the *Satyasiddhi Śāstra*. "If one enjoys offerings in a certain place" refers to stinginess regarding the place. "If one receives from a certain person" refers to stinginess regarding the household, also called stinginess toward the donor. "If it concerns the object received" refers to stinginess regarding the offering itself. "If it concerns the purpose for which it is received" refers to stinginess regarding praise. "If it concerns the manner in which it is received" refers to stinginess regarding the Dharma. Stinginess regarding the place means: "Only I should dwell here, no one else; even if others come, I must always be the master." Stinginess regarding the household means: "Only I should have access to this household, no one else should enter; even if others come, I must be the most superior among them." Stinginess regarding the offering means: "Only I should take this object, it should not be given to others; even if given to others, I must receive the most and the best." Stinginess regarding praise means: "Only I should be praised, do not praise others; even if others are praised, do not let them surpass me." Stinginess regarding the Dharma means: "Only I should understand the meaning of the scriptures, do not let others know; even if others understand, they must be inferior to me."
「又有五法,令修行者先毀淨戒」等者,即是五蓋:初二毀淨戒,後三毀名聞、虧止觀。不能領受,是惛眠蓋。忘失,是掉悔蓋。不定,是疑蓋。
"Furthermore, there are five factors that cause practitioners to first break their pure precepts" refers to the Five Hindrances. The first two break the pure precepts, while the latter three damage one's reputation and undermine meditation.
- Inability to receive teachings is the hindrance of dullness and drowsiness. - Forgetfulness is the hindrance of restlessness and regret. - Indecisiveness is the hindrance of doubt.
依見道下分說三結者,不越惡道故。邊見隨身見,見取隨戒取,邪見隨疑生,故說根本三即攝末六。 癡相通三界,瞋、貪增在欲,唯說貪、恚,即攝愚癡,不越下界故。故但說五為下分結。 又由身見不趣解脫,由戒禁取迷正趣邪路,由疑疑於正道,故於解脫障唯說初三為惡趣因。
Regarding the three fetters of the lower realm as explained in the Path of Seeing, they are spoken of because they prevent one from falling into the evil destinies. The view of extremes follows the view of self, and adherence to views follows adherence to precepts, while wrong views arise from doubt. Therefore, it is said that the three root fetters encompass the six subsidiary ones.
Delusion pervades the three realms, while anger and greed are particularly strong in the desire realm. By speaking only of greed and anger, delusion is also included, as it does not go beyond the lower realms. Thus, only five are referred to as the fetters of the lower realm.
Furthermore, due to the view of self, one does not progress toward liberation; due to adherence to precepts, one is misled onto a wrong path; and due to doubt, one hesitates on the correct path. Therefore, regarding obstacles to liberation, only the first three are said to be the causes for falling into evil destinies.
五上分結中,「無差別結」者,依界辨結,不依人故,名無差別;餘之三種,依人辨結,名有差別。其靜慮者,即是人故。因愛,掉生;因我慢,餘慢生;因疑,無明增。名有差別結。由無差別結,取上分生;由有差別結,不捨上分生。得靜慮者,為三惱故有差別,皆修所斷。故除見取,無疑說癡,阿羅漢斷故。
Among the five higher fetters, the "undifferentiated fetter" is classified based on realms, not on individuals, hence it is called undifferentiated. The other three types are classified based on individuals, hence they are called differentiated. The meditative states refer to individuals. From craving arises restlessness; from self-conceit arise other conceits; from doubt, ignorance increases. These are called differentiated fetters. Through the undifferentiated fetter, one grasps higher rebirth; through the differentiated fetters, one does not abandon higher rebirth. Those who attain meditative states are troubled by these three afflictions, all of which are to be eliminated through cultivation. Therefore, aside from the fetter of wrong views, ignorance is spoken of without doubt, as it is severed by the Arhat.
「五種不信敬」等者,一、於大師,二、於戒,三、於心,四、於慧,五、於三同梵行,無有信敬。
The "five kinds of lack of faith and reverence" are: first, toward the Great Teacher; second, toward the precepts; third, toward the mind; fourth, toward wisdom; and fifth, toward fellow practitioners of purity—in these, one has no faith or reverence.
「五種邪行」者:一、於怨起瞋;二、於親破壞;三者、常欲令生憂苦,作不饒益事;四、壞自尸羅;五、行三惡行。 「此中三種等流過患」者,以瞋怨故,多諸怨敵;以壞親故,親友乖離;以作不益事,令生苦故,種種憂苦恒現在前。此三後世等流果。 「一種現法等流過患」者,壞自戒故,臨終多悔。 「一種後法異熟過患」者,行三惡行故,後墮惡趣。
**The Five Unwholesome Actions** are: 1. Holding anger toward an enemy. 2. Damaging relationships with loved ones. 3. Constantly wishing to cause others worry and suffering, engaging in harmful acts. 4. Breaking one’s own moral precepts. 5. Committing the three unwholesome deeds (of body, speech, and mind).
**Among these, three bring about corresponding consequences**: - Because of anger toward enemies, one gains many adversaries. - Because of damaging relationships with loved ones, one becomes isolated from friends and family. - Because of causing suffering through harmful acts, various worries and pains constantly arise. These three are the corresponding results in future lives.
**One brings about immediate corresponding consequences**: - By breaking one’s own moral precepts, one experiences deep regret at the end of life.
**One brings about future karmic retribution**: - By committing the three unwholesome deeds, one falls into the lower realms in future existences.
「時節愚」者,愚於時節剎那生滅,無常計常。「分位愚」者,愚三受分位,於苦計樂。 「自性愚」者,愚五蘊性,無我計我。 第四、規利養。 第五、求活命。名「五所治法」。
The first is the "folly of time," being deluded about the fleeting moments of arising and ceasing, mistaking the impermanent for permanent. The second is the "folly of condition," being deluded about the three feelings, mistaking suffering for pleasure. The third is the "folly of nature," being deluded about the nature of the five aggregates, mistaking what is not-self for self. The fourth is seeking gain and offerings. The fifth is seeking mere survival. These are called the "five things to be remedied."
「二勝行者」者:一、定勝行;二、智勝行。定勝行有四:一、因聞依諦聖言論故,正解法義;二、因廣大言音讀誦經典;三、因為他開闡妙義;四、在空閑處審諦思惟。此後三種,例同於初,故言「如於因聽聞、因廣大音等正解法義」,當知亦爾。 「智勝行」者,思惟對除上品貪欲,是為第五。
The "Two Supreme Practices" are: first, the Supreme Practice of Concentration; second, the Supreme Practice of Wisdom. The Supreme Practice of Concentration has four aspects: 1. Correctly understanding the meaning of the Dharma through listening to and relying on the sacred teachings about the Truths. 2. Reciting the scriptures aloud with a clear and expansive voice. 3. Explaining the profound meaning to others. 4. Reflecting deeply and accurately in a quiet, secluded place. These latter three aspects are similar to the first, so it is said, "Just as one correctly understands the meaning of the Dharma through listening and through reciting with a clear voice, the same applies here."
The "Supreme Practice of Wisdom" is the fifth aspect: contemplating and counteracting strong desires.
「五種修觀行者」等,信菩提、涅槃為二意樂;無間殷重修習正智為第三,即聞、思慧也;無間殷重修奢摩他為第四;無間殷重修毘鉢舍那為第五。即修慧也。後三名方便具足。
"Five Types of Contemplative Practitioners" and others, who hold faith in Enlightenment and Nirvana as the two aspirations; unceasingly and diligently cultivating right knowledge as the third, which is the wisdom of listening and reflection; unceasingly and diligently cultivating calm abiding as the fourth; unceasingly and diligently cultivating insight as the fifth. This is the wisdom of meditation. The latter three are called the perfection of skillful means.
「二、於初靜慮初受生已,得般涅槃」者,《對法論》說:生色界已,聖道現前。此依先未離色界欲者說,非定唯爾。〈聲聞地〉中,常廣分別。 問:《對法》等說中般有三類,隨彼得果已便般無餘,何故餘四不還得有餘已,非即入無餘?中般三類,何故隨彼三類得五有餘已便即入無餘?答:由餘四般生、起結二俱未盡,生有時長,其勢強故,初得有餘已,非即入無餘。中般不還生結已盡,起結雖在,其勢微弱,況中有生,其勢但七日,故彼羸劣,得有餘已便入無餘依。《涅槃經》第三十六云:中般阿那含有四種心:一者、非學非無學;二者、學;三者、無學;四、非學非無學入於涅槃。第一者,初受生等有漏心;第二者,金剛定前諸無漏心;第三者,解脫道後諸無漏心。此前三種攝一切盡。無學身中入無餘依,隨順說一切有部以無覆無記異熟、威儀入於無餘,故此第四獨言非學非無學入於涅槃。 又真實理門,末後一剎那,亦唯第八識無覆無記入無餘依,故此第四獨說入於涅槃,餘三不說入於涅槃。 又彼經復云:四種心中,二是涅槃,二非涅槃者,以無學心入有餘依,以第四心入無餘依,前二非故。 又此論下說:欲入無餘依,要先入無相定。即此無學心第六意識也,其非學非無學即第八識也。若入滅定方入涅槃,唯有此故。
**2. "Upon first being born in the initial dhyāna, one attains parinirvāṇa."** The *Abhidharma-samuccaya* states: "After being born in the form realm, the noble path manifests." This is said with reference to those who have not previously severed desire for the form realm; it is not definitively only this. The *Śrāvakabhūmi* extensively distinguishes this in detail.
**Question:** The *Abhidharma-samuccaya* and other texts say that there are three types of *antarā-parinirvāyins* (those attaining nirvāṇa in the intermediate state), and that upon attaining the fruit [of non-returner] according to whichever type they are, they immediately enter the remainderless [nirvāṇa]. Why is it that the other four types of non-returners, having attained the remainder [nirvāṇa], do not immediately enter the remainderless? For the three types of *antarā-parinirvāyins*, why is it that upon attaining the fivefold remainder [nirvāṇa] according to whichever of the three types they are, they immediately enter the remainderless?
**Answer:** For the other four types, both the afflictions pertaining to birth and those that arise [in the present] are not yet exhausted. Their birth [in a realm] lasts for a long time, and their momentum is strong. Therefore, upon initially attaining the remainder [nirvāṇa], they do not immediately enter the remainderless. For the *antarā-parinirvāyin* non-returner, the afflictions pertaining to birth are already exhausted. Although the afflictions that arise [in the present] still exist, their momentum is very weak. Moreover, the intermediate-state existence lasts only seven days at most. Thus, due to their feebleness, upon attaining the remainder [nirvāṇa], they enter the remainderless support.
The *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra*, Chapter 36, states: "The *antarā-parinirvāyin* anāgāmin has four kinds of mind: 1. Neither learning nor beyond learning; 2. Learning; 3. Beyond learning; 4. Neither learning nor beyond learning, entering nirvāṇa."
The first refers to the initial contaminated minds at the time of taking birth, etc. The second refers to all uncontaminated minds prior to the vajra-like concentration. The third refers to all uncontaminated minds after the path of liberation. These first three encompass everything [that can be exhausted].
Entering the remainderless support within the body of one beyond learning is spoken of in accordance with the Sarvāstivāda, as [entering] with the unobscured, non-defined karmic resultant or comportmental [mind]. Therefore, this fourth one is separately stated as "neither learning nor beyond learning, entering nirvāṇa."
Furthermore, from the standpoint of true principle, the final moment is also only the eighth consciousness, which is unobscured and non-defined, entering the remainderless support. Therefore, this fourth one is separately said to enter nirvāṇa; the other three are not said to enter nirvāṇa.
Moreover, that sūtra further states: "Among the four kinds of mind, two are nirvāṇa, two are not nirvāṇa." This is because one enters the remainder support with the mind beyond learning, and enters the remainderless support with the fourth mind; the first two are not [nirvāṇa].
Also, this treatise below states: "To enter the remainderless support, one must first enter the signless concentration." This refers to the mind beyond learning, which is the sixth consciousness. The "neither learning nor beyond learning" is the eighth consciousness. If one enters the cessation attainment before entering nirvāṇa, only this [eighth consciousness] exists.
五種修觀行者,欲、恚、害染淨為三,色、無色等至為第四,涅槃相為第五也。
There are five types of practitioners who cultivate insight: First, the taint of desire; second, the taint of anger; third, the taint of harmfulness; Fourth, the meditative attainments of the form and formless realms; Fifth, the contemplation of Nirvana.
增六門中,合有十六門。 「謂依六相宣說八種有情事差別」等者,謂六根、六境、六識、六觸、六受、六想、六思、六愛,名為八事。 「我所依事差別」,六根也。 「境界事差別」,六境也。 「自性事差別」,六識也,執識為我自性故。 「受用因事差別」,六觸也,是受因故。 「受用事差別」,六受也。 「隨說事差別」,六想也,言說因故。「作用事差別」,是六思身也。 「希望事差別」,六愛身也,亦名六欲,以欲而為自性。
Within the six additional categories, there are a total of sixteen divisions. The phrase "based on six aspects, explaining the distinctions among eight types of sentient beings' affairs" refers to the six sense faculties, six sense objects, six consciousnesses, six contacts, six feelings, six perceptions, six volitions, and six cravings—these are called the eight affairs.
- "The distinctions of what I rely on" refer to the six sense faculties. - "The distinctions of the objects" refer to the six sense objects. - "The distinctions of inherent nature" refer to the six consciousnesses, as consciousness is grasped as the inherent nature of the self. - "The distinctions of the cause of experience" refer to the six contacts, as they are the cause of feeling. - "The distinctions of experience" refer to the six feelings. - "The distinctions of verbal expression" refer to the six perceptions, as they are the cause of speech. - "The distinctions of function" refer to the six volitional formations. - "The distinctions of desire" refer to the six cravings, also called the six desires, as desire is their inherent nature.
「於如是等事差別」等下,明依六相宣說八事。「我依眼等」,是初相。 「我於色等境」,是第二相,其計識為我,名事自性差別,通根、境等中,一一應說。 「由觸及受」,第三相,依一相說觸及受事。 「有如是名乃至隨起言說」,是第四相。 「造作一切法非法行」,是第五相。 「於可愛事乃至不住損減」,是第六相,非愛事中未得希不合,設合希不住,設住希損減。
Following this, the text clarifies the explanation of the eight matters based on six aspects.
"I depend on the eyes, etc." – this is the first aspect.
"I with regard to objects such as form, etc." – this is the second aspect. The view that takes consciousness as the self is called the distinction of the nature of things, and should be explained individually in relation to faculties, objects, and so on.
"Through contact and feeling" – this is the third aspect, explaining the matters of contact and feeling based on one aspect.
"There are such names, and even the arising of verbal expressions" – this is the fourth aspect.
"Engaging in all actions, whether wholesome or unwholesome" – this is the fifth aspect.
"With regard to desirable things, and even not dwelling in their diminishment" – this is the sixth aspect. In the case of undesirable things, one does not wish to obtain them if not yet obtained; if obtained, one wishes not to dwell in them; if dwelling in them, one wishes for their diminishment.
「又於寶學,六種輕蔑」等者,於三寶中應信不信,於三學中應得不得。 「由惡語故,全無所得」,謂增上戒。 「退失一切所有善法」者,即應信不信,應得不得。
"Regarding the 'six kinds of contempt toward the precious teachings,'" this refers to failing to have faith where faith in the Three Jewels is due, and failing to attain what should be attained in the threefold training.
"Through harsh speech, one gains nothing at all" refers to the higher discipline.
"Losing all virtuous qualities one possesses" means failing to have faith where faith is due and failing to attain what should be attained.
「又有六種最極清淨」等者,即六恒住。 「謂四大種、空界、識界」者,色所依謂大種,非色所依謂識界,行動所依謂空界,故唯說六以成有情。由此初言「是諸色根及所依處,隨其所應之所依止」。
「略有六種能障諦現觀法」者,謂前增五門中,三愚起三倒即為三,規求利養為第四,希望壽命為第五。五與前同。
「此中差別者」下,釋第六障,前所無故。言「是故說此在明分中,非在解脫成熟分中」者,成熟分,謂加行道;明分者,是資糧道。創求無漏慧明,故在明分;起此六障,非成熟分。又見道後,名明分;加行道,名成熟分。今此但障見等明分,非障成熟分也,障諦現觀故。 又人天身下明,入聖位是上明,故從人天得入聖者,名從明入明。人天明中起此障,非入聖後成熟位起。 「謂如前說五種取相」者,前增五門:無常、苦、無我相、於食惡逆相、於命中夭相。於趣涅槃行,戒也。趣資財行,施也。趣生天行者,修也。
六法名無上者:一、見大師;二、聞正法;三、得淨信;四、起隨學學處;五、於大師所起念行;六、於大師所承事供養。
增七,合十五門。「念通二品」者,前有因有具聖正三摩地中,念是定分;今通二者,修生於定,念隨定增,明記止觀,理通定慧。
「定障解脫,非煩惱障解脫,建立身證」者,其定障體,有二師義。安慧等云:三性心中並有法執,於中有說世親菩薩《緣起論》說無明通三性,故有漏三性心俱無明,為無漏定障體;諸散非善心俱無明,為有漏定障體。護法等釋不然。《瑜伽》等說無明有二,謂不善及無記。《瑜伽論》等不說無明有善性故。定障無明是所知障,雖二心有而無記性,欲界八心中異熟生所攝。《對法》第二說有二種應斷法,謂諸煩惱及此所依受。煩惱斷故,建立擇滅;二受斷故,建立不動及想受滅,即顯定障異熟生受及俱無明等以為自性,領受下劣,不能進修,於勝定中諸梗澁性。此說別行;若染心俱,一切皆是。二十七賢聖中,此七為初總果,餘二十種依別建立依,唯說此七。
「又三因緣七種行故」等者,趣入、安住、攝受,名三因緣。正見、正思惟,名初趣入因緣;正語、業、命,名安住因緣;正精進、念,名攝受因緣。由此三因七道支故,令心內定,心正一緣。
「七聖財所生之樂」者,謂信、戒、慚、愧、聞、捨、慧如次配之。「七魔品力」,隨其次第,翻七聖財。
「又有七種涅槃所對除法」等者,於初衰損有一對治,體謂貪欲;第二衰損有二對治,一於道、二於道果,心不信解;於第三哀損有四對治,謂懈怠、失念、心亂、惡慧。此七因,二不善根起,故名品類。
七識住中,「身異類」下,是第一、身異想異。 「當知與此」下,是第二、身一想一。 「梵世已下」,是第三、身異想一。 「第二靜慮已下」,是第四、身一想異。文略不說無色下三。
「七麁重」者,即七隨眠。
「有七法諍事止息」,即七滅諍法:一、現前毘尼;二、憶念毘尼;三、不癡毘尼;四、自言持毘尼;五、不見罪相毘尼;六、多不見罪相;七、如草布地。即如次配下七種違犯諍事。
第十五卷
增八門,合有十門。正念是正定所攝,如前和會。
「懈怠施」者,謂來求施,不遍不往施,唯待來求。「不隨所欲」者,是怖異施,怖自貧苦。 「顧戀施」者,習行先人之業,為報他昔之恩,然非己樂。 「未來施」者,希異熟,望他報,希二果故是失。 「輕慢施」者,恃己富貴,陵蔑故與,或為報恩,而輕慢彼。 「希求富樂」者,求天人中,外五塵故。 「求知聞」者,規名譽故。 「無染污心為往善趣」者,往彼為修自他利行,故非過也。
「四因緣故,於人趣中建立如來四眾」者:一、最增上故,謂國王等,即剎帝利;二、世間福田故,謂婆羅門,以多淨行,共許為福田;三、用財不由他,謂大長者;四、棄諸世財,謂諸沙門。此皆佛有,名如來眾。
「三因緣故,於天趣中建立四眾」名:一、依地邊際建立二眾,謂四大王眾天、三十三天,居住別故;二、欲界邊際建立魔眾;三、語行邊際建立梵眾。
八解脫中,「淨、不淨、非二色第一捨勝解,是名第三」者,由淨解脫,有三種想:一、展轉想待。二、展轉相入。此二通觀淨、不淨色,平等觀故,名捨勝解。三、展轉一味想,唯觀光明,不作淨、不淨,名非二色。第一捨勝解,平等觀光明,最勝位故,名第一捨。 「此三解脫至不共與一切異生共有」者,第十二卷已引成文,許異生得,今說勝者,故言不共。「此五勝解乃至受想滅等至最勝住」者,前說別引,空引往還神通,識引無諍等德;此即說通引,究竟定滿,故不相違。「又若觀諸色乃至而修習」者,是牒《八勝處經》。「謂三解脫」下,釋彼經文。前依初修勝處為果,今說文修勝處為因,如理智中解脫為果,故三勝處為方便因。 「觀諸色」者,謂前四勝處。 「若如所觀」者,謂後四勝處。如前已觀境差別觀色故,其八勝處而後成滿三解脫為因,故說三勝處是三解脫方便道攝,非唯三也。 「此中,觀外諸色乃至若勝」者,牒經。 「謂觀非三摩地所行現所得色」者,此釋前經觀大小諸色,義在定前加行聞思位中作此種種色觀故。 「由緣三摩地至故名為勝」者,釋定中得勝名所由。緣一類色,不同定前雜緣大小,故名為勝。 或非三摩地色,有小大相,是本質色;由緣三摩地乃至故名為勝,是緣定中色,唯一類緣,故名為勝,是前種種本質之影像故。前加行心有種種境相故,不勝境,不得勝;為三摩地中,境唯一類,心無異相,故名為勝。「已尋思,已了別」者,初時後時,了別異故。 「如是於外所想乃至觀諸色亦爾」者,此釋聞思位,唯同定中於引止觀若知若見,於彼色亦初尋思及後了別。
九有生處,即九有情居,第一袟中已釋。
十無學法,五蘊攝者,戒蘊攝語、業、命,定蘊攝念、定,慧蘊攝正見、思惟、精進,加餘二為十。解脫即勝解數;正見謂緣事慧,解脫智見謂緣無為慧。
第三、辨因明處中分二:初總問答標、後別顯釋。 「謂觀察義中諸所有事」者,所建立法,名觀察義;能隨順法,名諸所有事。諸所有事即是因明,為因照明觀察義故。所餘釋名,如彼疏解。
別釋有二:初舉頌列名、後隨別釋。論體有三:一、列名;二、別釋;三、料簡。
「論體」者,謂言生因,立論之體故。 「處所」者,謂證義者等論議處所。 「論所依」者,謂真能立、似現比義為言依,其所成立亦是所依。 「莊嚴」者,謂能破等。 「墮負」者,謂似立似破。 「出離」者,將興論時自安處法。 「多所作」者,由具上六,能多所作。
准論體性,有三:初標六門、次隨別釋、後問答辨。 「言論」者,以音聲為性,言說是體,言音是相,名詞是用,是三差別。 又由音聲起句、名、文,如次別故,立三差別。 或以音聲說一因二喻,立三差別。 「尚論」者,立世道理,不違世間所應尚論;立出世義,標勝名,不違尚論故。 諍論、毀謗論是言論起所因惡緣。 諍論有四:一、因諸欲起;二、欲侵奪、無攝受欲起;三、惡行所起;四、依諸見起。諍論因事所生,謗論因言所起。 順正、教導二論是言論起所因善緣。順正論是戒學善緣,教導論是定慧善緣。 最後二論應修習者,順正理故。 中間二論應遠離者,勿耽惡事及起惡言而興論故,為欲斷除興言可爾,亦即是彼修習攝。初二種論應分別故,性通善惡,應修斷故。論處所有六。「於王家」者,有德國王,平均識達,於彼可論,翻此不能。 「執理家」者,平均識達,斷善斷事家。 「大眾中」者,眾有平均識達者故。餘三可解。
論所依中有三:初標十種、次隨別釋、後問答辨十種次第。別釋有二:一、所成;二、能成。
所成立義有二:「自性差別」等者,此中宗等名為能立、自性差別為所立者,此有三重:一云宗言所成立義,名為所立,故此所立而有義言。其宗能詮之言及因等言義,皆名能立。其宗之言,因喻成故,雖亦所立,此下文說為先顯示自所愛樂宗義,故亦所立。非定所立,能成義故,猶如於因喻皆成,故但名能立。所詮義決定唯是所立,獨名所成。 二云諸法總聚自性、差別,若教若理俱是所立。此但名義,隨應有故。總中一分,對敵所申,若言若義,自性、差別,俱名為宗,即名能立。雖別宗,亦是所立,能立總故,得能立名。故陳那等,宗名所立,與《瑜伽》等,理不相違。《瑜伽》等說宗非一向唯能立故。 三云自性、差別合所依義,名為所立;能依合宗,說為能立,總立別故。非此總宗定唯能立,對敵合申,因、喻成故,亦是所立。由非定所立,故得能立名。陳那但以共許因、喻,成他未許。他未許者,唯是合宗。宗為所立,自性、差別但是宗依,所望義殊,不相違故。
能成立中,文其有二:初標列八門、後隨別釋。第三、「引喻」者,總也。 「同類、異類」者,別也。於總況法,別引於一,同品異品為二喻故。《對法》十六中,以因總辨,而不別開,於喻之中,亦唯申總,但以能成有八,數不可乖,於成義中更加合、結。此論以合、結不離因、喻,故不別開。彼以成義增明,故別離立,不相違也。陳那以合、結不離於喻,能立除之;《對法》以合義重增,故別離為能立。引喻總別,增減亦然。 又立論之者,現量等三,疎有悟他,古名能立;立敵之者,親唯自悟,故陳那等不為能立,不相違也。
立宗中,「各別攝受自品所許」者,此是總文也。攝受者是自意樂義,品是宗義,故《顯揚》第十一云自宗所許。此中意說:依二所立,立論各別,隨自意樂,自宗所許,故說名宗。此中三釋:一云以言對理,取依義別詮,名為各別自宗所許;二、以別對總,取依總之別,言及義二,名自所許;三、以合對離,取能依不相離性,合以為自宗所許。立宗依離義以為所立,故此文總。 「或攝受論宗」者,依自所師宗,對異師敵,而立自宗。不爾,便有相符極成。 「若自辨才」者,由自辨才,立他宗義,隨自意樂,不顧論宗。唯此二種,是正所宗。 若遍所許,若同因宗承,若傍義准,非別攝受,非隨自樂,故非真宗,立已成故、非本成故。此宗時,「若輕蔑他,若從他聞,若自覺悟真實」而申宗趣,此三名立宗因緣。 「或成自宗、或破他宗」二句,舉一切立宗之意不過此故。 「或折伏他」,釋上成立自宗。 「或摧屈於他」,釋上破壞他宗。成自破他,皆為悲愍故。後三句釋前二意故。後十句分為三類:初二句是宗體,次三句是立宗因緣,後五句立宗意。
因謂所以,三喻、量能成於宗,所有建立順益道理,即具三相之言義也。
現量文有三:一、標;二、釋;三、問答辨。 「已生已等生,若生若起」者,於過去世異熟增上果,名已生;等流果,名已等生,等是相似義故。住現在生,名若者;若住未來生,名若起。
「覆障所礙,謂黑闇」等者,此有三種:一、黑闇,謂暗色;二、無明暗,癡故迷境;三、不澄清色暗,謂壁障等。若瑠璃等,名澄清色,即非覆障,雖隔可見。 「或色相殊勝」者,日光威勢,眼觀不覩,色相勝故。「三極遠」,如初袟中解。 「非已思應思現量」者,已思應思,多是比量,或非量攝,今非此二,故名現量。 「當知此藥色香味觸,纔取便成所取依止」者,其能依止,謂藥威勢,此非現量。威勢所依色香味觸,任運纔取便是所取威勢之所依止,此為現境。能取之者,名為現量。 「藥之所有大勢威德,病若未愈,名為應思」等者,此藥功能,病未差來,常應思慮;其病若愈,名為已思,思已息故。此應思、已思二作用境非現境體,能緣彼思亦非現量,返顯前說纔取便成取所依境,能緣彼心是名現量。 「此中,建立境界取所依境,非已思惟,非應思惟」等者,謂外空地等,為定境本質者,是建立境界取所依境,建立定心影像境故,此現境體能取之心說名現量。地等諸界,貫前方便。解若未成,未來名應思惟等,非現境體,能取彼心非定現量,返顯建立境界取所依境名為現境。此二門中,初是所造,後是能造。此中,非不現見等三種名現量者,《入正理》說:此中現量,謂無分別。若有正智於色等義,離名種等所有分別,現現別轉,故名現量。諸部不同,此論與《因明》亦別,皆如彼疏。觀此文說世間亦有清淨現量,故淨定心亦現量攝,非要得境體五俱意等名現量體。
比量者,謂藉眾相而觀於義智。於二量中,即智名果等,皆如《因明》說。 「執持自相,比知道俗」者,執持衣鉢等相,比知是道;持冠冕等,比知是俗。
「謂為可記,或安立記」者,初記自體,後記差別。初總記有,後曲別示。 「如執一切樂受皆貪所隨眠」等者,依增隨眠雖別如是,非三隨眠互不隨增,故執唯爾名違法相。又離漏三受非三所增,若執皆增便違法相。
「一、不決定故;二、同所成者」下,此第二復次釋立同類、異類所以。此言意顯因於宗過,名為不成;於同異喻過,名為不定;於宗喻過,名曰相違。 不決定故者,即六不定也。因於同異喻相違故,不能決定成其宗義。 同所成者,即四不成,四相違也。本立共因,擬成宗果,因既帶似,理須更成;若更成之,與宗無別,故名同所成也。似同異喻亦在此攝。
不相違中,決定故者,真因真喻定成宗故。
異所成者,即真因喻無諸過失,體能成故,異於所成。其相違者,即似因似喻,及似現比,不能為量。不相違,即真因等,及真現比,能為量故。至教量體,聞思慧等,緣至教智。
第四、別釋論莊嚴中分二:初明五種莊嚴莊嚴論者,德圓滿故;後明二十七種稱讚功德,若具此者,名稱讚功德。 「已善已說已明」者,讀誦受持,名已善;聽聞,名已說,曾聽聞故,堪為他說;思惟純熟,名已明。
「義善」者,謂能引發勝生、定勝者,世善能引增上生道,出世善能引決定勝道。
「多眾」者,謂大施會眾。 「雜眾」者,謂八部眾。「大眾」者,謂國王、王子眾。 「執眾」者,謂執理眾,即斷事家。 「諦眾」者,謂諸實語眾,或諸聖眾。「善眾」者,謂沙門眾,或樂法義。多、雜二眾,論六處所中,合名大眾。 大眾者,即彼王家。執眾者,即執理家。諦眾者,即彼賢哲者。善眾者,即彼善解義及樂法義者也。
「而不嚵速」者,他正語時,中路即言,名嚵;不徐徐中理,名速。
言過中,「無義」者,無義理。 「違義」者,違正道理。 「損理」者,損二諦理。 「與所成等」者,能立帶似,應可成立,非真立故,即前問答中同所成故也。 「成立能成」者,以因成因,以喻成喻。
第四段,聲明處有二:初結前標列、後隨別釋。「法施設建立,謂名身、句身」等者,出聲明體。「及五德」等者,由彼聲體具五德故,方成聲論,勝能詮聲。聲論者說,謂名、句、文體即是聲,聲性是常,音響是無常,無常之響顯於常聲,若知常聲,名曰聲明。 「義施設建立」者,聲明所詮之義,以彼聲明依能詮、所詮而建立故。又說六種中,「差別相應義」者,諸法同類,互得相應,體差別故。 「轉義」者,如於一法無量義門差別而轉,如一色法可見、不可見等諸義別轉。
「補特伽羅施設建立,謂立男、女、非男非女」等者,依此三類,立聲差別。先俗所傳蘇漫多聲中,有此三類:一、八補盧沙,是男聲體義;二、悉底履,是女聲體義;三、如納蓬(去聲)素迦,是非男非女聲體義。復有總聲,如涅履題勢。此之四種,各有八囀,一一囀中,皆有一名、二名、多名,如是合有九十六聲。如《別抄》說。
「或復建立初、中、上士聲相差別」者,若依後俗,底彥多聲有十八囀,非世所用。此言三類,上、中、下士各有三聲,如小兒為下士,未有所識,不知自他有善有惡,但汎出聲;如號號之士名中士,唯見他有善惡,而不知;廣達之士名上士,唯內自省,應作而作,不應作而不作。此三士聲各目一體、二體、多體,三積成九。今言初、中、上士,即三種八轉中各有三故。
「過去過去殊勝」等者,近過去名過去,遠過去名殊勝,未來亦爾。現在長時名現在,剎那名殊勝。
「處所根栽施設建立」者,如樹栽,樹之根本,故聲根本名曰根栽,即是字也。出聲處所,名為處所,出聲處故,本聲明也。謂劫初起,梵王創造一百萬頌《聲明》;後命慧減,帝釋復略為十萬頌;次有迦單沒羅仙,略為一萬二千頌;次有波膩尼仙,略為八千頌。此上四論,總名處所。今現行者唯有後二,前之二論並已滅沒。 字體根栽,《聲明論》有三百頌;波膩尼仙所造,略成聲明頌,為一千頌,名為《聲明略本頌》;後有《八界論》,有八百頌,名為《因緣》;又有《聞釋迦論》,一千五百頌;又有《溫那地論》,二千五百頌。此五聲明並名根栽,能與根本處所聲明為生智解所依本故。然護法菩薩造二萬五千頌,名《雜寶聲論》,西方以為聲明究竟之極論,盛行於世也。 「相續」者,是聲明中合聲合字法為一品,是第一分。 「名號」者,劫初時,梵王於一一法皆立千名,帝釋後減為一百名,後又減為十名,後又減為三名,總為一品,是第二名號品、名號分。 「總略」者,是聲明中根本略要。 「彼益」者,是次中略之,令物生解,名為彼益。 「宣說」者,是廣宣說。謂略、中、廣是後三品,即後三名。上來五分即是五品,是本聲明之分品故,合名處所。
「若界頌」者,謂字體三百頌,名界;波膩尼仙所造聲明一千頌,名《略本頌》,即此頌也。「等」者,謂八百頌《八界論字因緣》,并千五百頌《聞釋迦論》,及二千五百頌《溫那他論》,故名為等。
第五、工業明處中,「生成工業」者,謂養六畜成資生故,或教生修成禮儀。 「防那工業」者,謂織繡等,西方男作,故存本音,名為防那,男聲呼之。 「和合工業」者,即賈人、說容,如蘇秦之類,眾和匝人也。 「成熟工業」者,謂成熟飲食。
瑜伽師地論略纂卷第六
享保八年(癸卯)二月十四日一交畢
沙門高範(胎生六十九)