DonateZen HallLibrary
Skip to main content
  1. Profound Treatise on the Lotus Sutra (法華玄論)
  2. Volume 10 (第十)
  3. Discourse on Distinguishing Merits and the Meaning of the Numbers of (論分別功德品生數義)
←&→
Use ← → arrow keys to turn pages

Profound Treatise on the Lotus Sutra (法華玄論)


法華玄論卷第十

Treatise on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus Sutra, Volume 10

胡吉藏撰

Compiled by Hu Jizang

論分別功德品生數義

On the Chapter on the Analysis of Merit: The Meaning of the Number of Those Born

問曰:經言八生乃至一生,據何義此說?

Question: The sutra speaks of "eight more births, up to one more birth." On what principle is this stated?

答:注經云「體壽量之深玄、神凝絕崖之境,豈感生數差別不同,由強心不一、發機處異,故此品位不同以示學人耳。色想既虛,滅定可修,入解心開然後乃會,故言八生也。四生者,四等意發,因此而悟,故言四生。三生者,居宗化物必資三達,故云三生。二生者,空有兩冥、法門不二,故曰二生。一生者,微妙之根盡乎一極,故曰一生也。」評曰:壽量雖絕形,言悟者必有明珠。既許十地階漸,何妨以生昇降?經既誠言,不應曲釋。竊謂不爾,後當具陳。

Answer: The commentary on the sutra says: "The Tathāgata's lifespan is profound and unfathomable, and his spirit rests in a realm beyond all extremes. How could those who are moved to birth by his influence differ in number? It is because the strength of their aspiration is not uniform and the point at which their capacity is awakened differs, and so their grade and rank differ, which is shown to learners. Since the perception of form is already empty, the cessation concentration can be cultivated; when they enter understanding and their minds open, only then do they awaken—therefore it speaks of eight births. As for four births: the four immeasurable intentions are aroused, and through this they awaken—therefore it speaks of four births. As for three births: one who presides over the teaching and transforms beings must rely on the three knowledges—therefore it says three births. As for two births: empty and existent are both transcended, and the Dharma-gates are non-dual—therefore it says two births. As for one birth: the subtlest faculties reach the utmost limit of the one ultimate—therefore it says one birth." Critique: Although the Tathāgata's lifespan transcends form, one who awakens in speech must surely have the bright pearl. Since the ten stages and their gradual ascent are already accepted, what harm is there in ascending and descending through births? Since the sutra itself speaks in truthful words, one should not distort its meaning. In my humble opinion this is not so; I shall set it out in full later.

光宅云:「此中約惑品論之。以無明住地惑分九品,能為九生作因。從七地至金剛為五位,一七地、二八地、三九地、四十地、五金剛,於前四位所治各開為二品,金剛為一品,合成九品。一品為一生,則是九生。若居六地之前,望金剛位具餘九生。今住六地,聞經得入七地,以斷其一,但餘八品,故云餘八生當得菩提。亦應次此至七六五生,但今對上八數而取其半,故云四生,如是次第除損稱一生。三二一皆遂四天下數而除之,故云四生乃至一生,故下偈頌中復有四三二。如是四天下微塵數菩薩隨數生成佛,即此義也。十地中忍餘金剛是一生當得,則四生者是八地,終入九地,准向品可知。」評曰:今請詳斷惑之法,何故七八九十此之四地各斷二品惑,金剛獨斷一品惑耶?尋經論明地斷惑,未見此法,亦非所用也。

Guangzhai says: "Here, the discussion is based on the categories of affliction. The affliction of the ignorance-realm is divided into nine grades, which can serve as causes for nine rebirths. From the seventh ground to the vajra-like state there are five stages: first, the seventh ground; second, the eighth ground; third, the ninth ground; fourth, the tenth ground; fifth, the vajra-like state. In the first four stages, the afflictions to be eliminated in each are each opened into two grades, and the vajra-like state is one grade, making nine grades in total. One grade corresponds to one rebirth, and thus there are nine rebirths. If one is situated before the sixth ground, then in relation to the vajra-like state one still has the remaining nine rebirths. Now, dwelling on the sixth ground, one hears the sutra and enters the seventh ground, and by eliminating one of these, only eight grades remain; therefore it says, 'with the remaining eight rebirths one will attain Enlightenment.' One should likewise [say] next to this, up to seven, six, and five rebirths, but now, in relation to the number eight above, one takes half of it; therefore it says four rebirths. In this way, successively eliminating and reducing is called one rebirth. Three, two, one — all are eliminated according to the number of the four continents; therefore it says four rebirths and so on up to one rebirth. Hence, in the verses below there are again four, three, two. Thus, bodhisattvas as numerous as the fine dust particles of the four continents, according to that number of rebirths, become Buddhas — this is the meaning. In the tenth ground, [within] the patient endurance [stage], the remaining vajra-like [state] is one rebirth, and one will attain it; then the four rebirths are the eighth ground, and at the end one enters the ninth ground. According to the preceding chapter, this can be known." Critique: Now, please examine carefully the method of eliminating afflictions. Why is it that the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth grounds each eliminate two grades of affliction, while the vajra-like state alone eliminates one grade of affliction? Searching the sutras and treatises on the elimination of afflictions by ground, I have not seen this method, nor is it what is used.

印師釋:「十二位中初三種是從初地通至七地,旋陀羅尼是八地,轉不退輪為九地,轉清淨法輪為十地。又其八生者,從初地至六地。其四生者,是七地終心。三生是八地,二生為九地,一生為十地。亦約惑以明生數,謂四住地惑名為四生,習氣為第五生,三無知即三品為三生,都是八分為八生,故對其次第位如向敘也。」評曰:印師釋則是二周明十地得益義。從初三位至清淨法輪,此一周明十地得益也。從八生至一生,復一周明十地得益。但前據所得、後約所離,故有兩周而意無異。今謂於文為繁。所以然者,十地得益既無異,但列一便足,何繁再陳耶?譬如已說小乘得法眼淨為一位,後說遠塵離垢復為一位者,義則繁矣。

Master Yin's interpretation: "Among the twelve stages, the first three—from the first ground through to the seventh ground—correspond to the initial three. The 'whirlpool dhāraṇī' corresponds to the eighth ground; 'turning the irreversible wheel' to the ninth ground; 'turning the pure Dharma wheel' to the tenth ground. Furthermore, the 'eight births' span from the first ground to the sixth ground. The 'four births' refer to the final mind of the seventh ground. The 'three births' correspond to the eighth ground, the 'two births' to the ninth ground, and the 'one birth' to the tenth ground. This is also a way of counting births in terms of afflictions: the afflictions of the four abodes are called the four births; habitual tendencies are the fifth birth; the three types of unknowing, i.e., the three grades, are the three births—altogether eight portions making eight births. Thus, matched to their sequential stages, they are as described above."

Critique: Master Yin's interpretation thus takes two rounds to explain the meaning of the benefits attained at the ten grounds. From the first three positions through to 'turning the pure Dharma wheel'—this is one round explaining the benefits of the ten grounds. From 'eight births' through 'one birth'—this is again a second round explaining the benefits of the ten grounds. The former is based on what is attained, the latter on what is abandoned; hence there are two rounds, though the meaning is no different. I hold that this is redundant in the text. The reason is that, since the benefits of the ten grounds are no different, listing them once would suffice—why repeat them so redundantly? For example, if one has already stated that the small vehicle attainment of the pure Dharma eye constitutes one position, and afterward states that being far from dust and free of defilement constitutes another position, the meaning would be redundant.

有人言:初發心即是外凡。十信菩薩鐵輪之位,此從外凡聞經入十信。次從十信聞經進入十住,十住即是無生法忍,故云「入理三昧名為住,生功德名為地。」次十住聞經進入十行,十行聞十方佛說一切教能持,即是聞持陀羅尼。十行聞經進至十迴向樂說之辨。迴向者,能迴事向道。次從十迴向進入初地,入初地故能無礙,以無礙行故百法明門旋轉名旋陀羅尼。次不退是二地,清淨為一地,八生為四地。此中言生者,了法實相無生故能發生,此即是正觀開發故名生耳,非是身數得佛近遠故名生也。問:既言正觀開發名生,云何有生數耶?此望佛地正觀猶有八過開發生,故云八生也。四生者從四地起至八地,三生者九地,二生者十地,一生者等覺地。此中得悟不定故從四地至八地不必一一次第也。評曰:此釋似次第,但未詳此意。何故初三地不言生,從四地去而言生耶?若從真觀開發為生者,則始於初地終竟法雲皆應爾也。又經論幸有生數之說文,何不依耶?今撿經論有二種生。《淨名經》云「一生得菩提」,《釋論》明三生菩提,此據應身成佛生數多少之義。如彌勒亦是三生,亦是一生。三生者,即是人間,次生天上,後下生作佛。一生者,據最後生。或云:取生天為一生,下生作佛乃示佛身耳。次云生者,《仁王經》云「三十生功德,地地三生。」初見此說,謂是疑經,不足為證。後見《地論》云「一一地皆有入、住、滿三分」,又見《攝大乘論》亦同《地論》說也。又云「一地三僧祇劫。入分一僧祇劫,住滿亦爾。」以此推之,則地地中有三生也。但前據應身,後說實行。今用此二文以通上說者,若就應身成佛而言八生者,即八過受生,乃至一生而得菩提,如彌勒一生得佛也。次據實行通者,十地既有三十生,今言八生得佛者,則二十二生已滿,唯餘八生,此人已是八地入分。乃至一生者,此是十地住分,餘有滿分一生在耳。故《仁王》解十地菩薩云「二十九生永已度」也。

Some say that the initial arousal of the mind [of enlightenment] is the stage of the outer ordinary person. The Bodhisattva of the Ten Faiths is at the iron-wheel stage; this is [the case of] entering the Ten Faiths from the outer ordinary person through hearing the sutra. Next, from the Ten Faiths, through hearing the sutra, one enters the Ten Dwellings. The Ten Dwellings are precisely the acquiescence to the non-arising of dharmas. Therefore it is said: "Entering the principle of concentration is called dwelling; producing merit is called ground." Next, from the Ten Dwellings, through hearing the sutra, one enters the Ten Practices. In the Ten Practices, one hears the buddhas of the ten directions expound all teachings and is able to uphold them—this is the dhāraṇī of hearing and upholding. From the Ten Practices, through hearing the sutra, one advances to the eloquence of the Ten Dedications. "Dedication" means being able to turn affairs toward the Path. Next, from the Ten Dedications one enters the first ground; because of entering the first ground, one is without obstruction; by means of unobstructed practice, the gate of the hundred dharmas revolves—this is called the revolving dhāraṇī. Next, non-retrogression is the second ground, purity is the first ground, and the eight births are the fourth ground. Here, "birth" means: because one has understood the true reality of dharmas as non-arising, one is able to generate [insight]; this is precisely the opening up of correct contemplation, and therefore it is called "birth"—it is not that "birth" means the number of physical bodies by which one is near to or far from buddhahood. Question: If it is said that the opening up of correct contemplation is called birth, how can there be a count of births? Answer: With respect to the correct contemplation of the buddha-ground, there are still eight passages of opening up and generating, and therefore it is said to be eight births. "Four births" means from the fourth ground up to the eighth ground; "three births" is the ninth ground; "two births" is the tenth ground; "one birth" is the ground of equal enlightenment. Here, since attainment of realization is not fixed, from the fourth ground to the eighth ground it is not necessarily one by one in sequence. Critique: This explanation seems sequential, but the meaning has not been examined in detail. Why do the first three grounds not speak of birth, while from the fourth ground onward birth is spoken of? If the opening up of true contemplation is taken as birth, then from the first ground through to the Dharma-cloud ground it should all be so. Moreover, since the sutras and treatises fortunately contain textual statements of the count of births, why not follow them? Now, examining the sutras and treatises, there are two kinds of birth. The Vimalakīrti Sutra says, "In one birth one attains bodhi." The Treatise on Interpretation explains bodhi in three births—this is based on the meaning of the number of births by which the response-body accomplishes buddhahood. Maitreya too is three births, and also one birth. "Three births" means: in the human realm, then born in heaven, and afterward descending to be born as a buddha. "One birth" refers to the final birth. Some say: taking birth in heaven as one birth, the descent to be born as a buddha is merely the manifestation of the buddha-body. Next, regarding "birth": the Renwang Sutra says, "The merit of thirty births—three births in each ground." When I first saw this statement, I took it to be a suspect sutra and insufficient as evidence. Later I saw the Daśabhūmika Treatise say, "Each and every ground has three aspects: entering, dwelling, and fulfillment." And I also saw that the Summary of the Great Vehicle agrees with the Daśabhūmika Treatise. It also says, "One ground is three asaṃkhya kalpas. The entering aspect is one asaṃkhya kalpa; the dwelling and fulfillment aspects are likewise." Inferring from this, there are three births within each ground. However, the former is based on the response-body, while the latter speaks of actual practice. Now, using these two passages to reconcile the above statements: if, with regard to the response-body accomplishing buddhahood, one speaks of eight births, that means eight passages of receiving birth, and so on down to one birth and the attainment of bodhi—as with Maitreya attaining buddhahood in one birth. Next, reconciling by actual practice: since the ten grounds have thirty births, when it is now said that one attains buddhahood in eight births, then twenty-two births are already complete and only eight births remain. This person is already at the entering aspect of the eighth ground. And so on down to "one birth"—this is the dwelling aspect of the tenth ground, with only the one birth of the fulfillment aspect remaining. Therefore the Renwang Sutra, explaining the bodhisattva of the tenth ground, says, "Twenty-nine births have forever been passed."

問:至十地滿則猶是十地,云何言便得佛?

Question: If the completion of the tenth ground is still the tenth ground, how can you say that one then attains Buddhahood?

答:十地滿坐道場故,得成佛也。

Answer: Because they have completed the ten stages and sit at the seat of enlightenment, they attain Buddhahood.

問:據後義,云何斷惑耶?
答:《攝大乘論》云「地地中上中下三品惑,即以入、住、滿三分治之,故名斷也。」
問:《攝大乘論》既言「一地經三僧祇劫行行」,云何一聞經從八生即至四生耶?
答:彼論明地地三僧祇劫,此據其極久者耳。復有超生義則不定,如釋迦之超彌勒等也。又此經但明八生得佛乃至四生得佛耳,不云何從八生經得至四生也。
問:請示其相云何?
答:一僧祇劫修行方得入分者,今聞經力故,或可減一僧祇劫,其義不定,可以意知也。
問:就生義通,何得從八生乃至四生耶?
答,如本是八生人應得菩提,今聞經力故超四生便得佛。如釋迦之超彌勒義,例可知也。
問:彌勒一生得佛,既是十地位者,八生得佛復是何位人耶?
答:亦是十地,但十地去佛猶遠,其中劫數猶長,可得有八生,如《攝大乘論》說。但聞經力故,則超於劫數速至佛耳。晚見《法華論》云「八生一生得菩提者,此說初地。為菩提者此八生得入初地,乃至一生得入初地。初地離分段,故云菩提,非佛菩提也。」
論得道多少義。
問:自鹿薗已上雙樹已還未有得道,如法華之會何故爾耶?請為宣釋。
答:略就二義明之。一者此經明三引義,一化始終唯有三引,至於法華三引究竟。一者鹿薗已後法華之前,引九十六種外道及餘一切在家眾生皆入五乘之教,謂引邪歸正。二者引五乘之異同歸一乘,即是法華初段。三者引一乘之因入如來法身果,謂第二段。此三引攝一切教,以是義故,豫是應悟之徒皆於此經得道也。
問:此之三引引何等人耶?
答:皆是宿世曾經稟教,但釋迦見其道緣應熟,為之出世。所以初之一引邪歸正,乃至最後引因得果,故有八生乃至證佛者也。
問:三引為一人耶?三人耶?
答:具有二義。言一人者,宿世曾經稟教,但失父流浪生死,或在家而愛五欲、或墮外道而起諸見,為拔愛見故引邪歸五乘。二者雖於生死中不起愛見,而於五乘復起愛見,為拔五乘中愛見故說乘因。此遂得信悟發菩提心,名為因位也。信心已成,次為說果德有無方大用,令其歷位修因求此果德,是故第三引因歸果也。此人於三引中破三種煩惱故,初引破生死中煩惱,第二破涅槃中煩惱。又初引破邪法中煩惱,次引破正法中煩惱。又初凡夫煩惱,次破二乘煩惱。又初引破有見,次破空見。如是等皆是破二邊煩惱,然後得中道正信,發菩提心。第三引廣說如來寂然法身無方妙用,破其中道微細煩惱。今從十信入十住,從十住入十行,從十行入十迴向,從十迴向入十地,乃至八生一生得佛,皆是破中道煩惱除一乘之惑也。此皆是約三乘人始終,故開此三引。次引菩薩者,法華之前已發心求佛,聞第二會三歸一無復二乘,則求佛之心堅固,所以云「菩薩聞是法疑網皆已除」。聞第三引,歷位登昇取無上道也。此約始行菩薩有此三也。次明於《法華》之前已得悟無生者,受記作佛,如前云「有佛子心淨,乃至我記如是人來世得作佛。」聞法華二引,更復進行,故有得聞持樂說,乃至八生一生。此略舉三人以示大要,不可曲盡也。以此經具明三引,故得道多也。二者諸佛化物唯有二門:一形、二教。各二,一者方便、二者真實。昔未開二方便、顯二真實,故得道少。今開兩權顯於兩實,故得道者皆在法華。
問曰:得道要是見空,云何聞說壽量而得道耶?
答:以此責執無常佛者,辭理俱屈。明佛猶是無常,云何見無常而得道耶?又無常猶未了義,云何聞未了義而得已了之解耶?又是無常尚不能令凡夫欣慕、二乘改執,豈能令菩薩速證菩提?又佛若是無常者,已信一乘則退起三執,復何猶進得菩提?是故不應得道者多。今所明者,此經稱為妙法蓮華,妙法者是即法身,未曾常與無常,言窮慮絕,且為眾生故長短適緣,雖示長短而不動法身,雖不動法身而長短化物。是以經云「善哉世尊!不動真際為諸法立處」,如此本迹無有障礙,不可思議。但果地有本迹二身,因中名權實二慧,如來既說兩身,菩薩便悟二慧,是以時會皆得道也。
問:云何得無生乃至發菩提心耶?
答:文已明之,今示一勢。既說寂滅之身,故聞者不復生心動念,故名無生忍。本雖垂迹,實無所垂,雖無所垂而無所不垂。時會即同糺,雖聞而無所聞,雖無所聞而無所不聞,故名聞持陀羅尼。昔日示短、今日現長,皆是適緣,故名樂說。短長自在,故名無礙。為物陳之,稱為辯才。時會得於此悟,名樂說無礙辯才。昔指長為短,今指短為長,即以長短為非長短、非長短為長短,縱任循環自在無礙。菩薩隨分得悟,名旋陀羅尼。如此之身縱任自在不可破壞,菩薩隨分得解,名不退輪也。此身出一切凡夫二乘菩薩之上,畢竟清淨,菩薩隨分悟解,名清淨輪。為如此身發心求佛,名菩提心也。
次隨喜義。
問:隨喜有幾種耶?
答:隨喜有二種。一通隨喜,謂若見若聞若覺若知他所作福,皆隨而歡喜,謂通隨喜。二者別隨喜者,且據聞《法華經》隨而歡喜,故名別隨喜。
論大小隨喜。
問:大小乘隨喜有何異?
答:隨喜正是菩薩法門,故菩薩五悔中有隨喜義,但小乘隨分有之耳。又小乘明喜義局,唯隨喜三世佛及弟子善根耳,無有隨喜十方三世佛也。大乘明隨喜三世十方佛及弟子善根,故廣也。又小乘但有隨喜迹身功德,不知法身常恒,故無隨喜法身功德也。又小乘隨喜功德不迴向薩婆若,大乘用隨喜功德趣一切智也。又小乘隨喜是有漏心,非是理中觀行;大乘隨喜通漏無漏,始行人隨喜是有漏,深行隨喜即是波若正觀,無得無依,故是無漏。又小乘隨喜生身菩薩功德,無有隨喜法身功德,以小乘法中不說菩薩得法身,故論自他隨喜。
問:隨喜是自行、化他門?
答:正是化他門。所以然者,菩薩本為教化眾生令作福德,而眾生能作者,菩薩歡喜,故是化他門。若自欲除嫉妬煩惱求福德故起隨喜,是自行門也。
論二經隨喜。
問:《法華》明隨喜與《大品》明隨喜何異?
答:《大品》正說無得隨喜,隨喜即是波若。故論主云「佛欲令須菩提就隨喜門說波若,故明隨喜。」
問:云何就隨喜說波若耶?
答:知能隨喜之心及所隨喜之福,無得無依、不能不所、非二非不二,如此歡喜心即是波若。又以波若心隨喜,故隨喜即是波若。
問:前境福德為所、菩薩之心為能,有此能所可名隨喜。今云不能不所,云何名隨喜?
答:論主云「此中應用波若及傴和」,以波若故知能所未曾能所,以傴和故雖未曾能所而能所宛然。能所不動,無能所。無能所,不動能所而不失能所。無能所如鏡中像,非像非不像,欲言其像像非真有,欲言非像事像既形。非二非不二亦爾。以波若故非二,方便力故非不二,故言非二非不二也。
問:《法華》明隨喜云何耶?
答:《波若》但取無所得隨喜,《法華》通明得無得隨喜。何以知之?直明一因一果能信受不逆,即是隨喜,不開得無得二也。
問:《大品》何故開得無得,而《法華》不開耶?
答:《波若》為破有得住著,故明無得隨喜。有所得不動不出不能至佛,故非波若也。《法華》合取者,此敘諸佛出世大意,說一切教皆為開一正道,故低頭舉手之善皆入一乘也。又五乘人謂四乘善根不作佛,佛乘善根方作佛;為破此病,故明一切善皆作佛也。
問:若一切善法作佛者,一切善皆能動出耶?
答:一切善亦能動出。所以然者,由有所得善相資故,然後生無所得善。有所得善是無所得遠緣,以此言之亦有動出之義也。
問:若爾,與《大品》相違。
答:《波若》明不動不出者,但取近緣,不取遠緣。何以知之?動為順忍、出為無生忍,有所得非此二忍耳,亦得是二忍之前遠緣也。
問:二經得相成不?
答:正相成也。《大品》雖明無所得善,要須藉有得為遠緣。《法華》雖明得無得皆入一乘,若欲出三界至佛道,要須無得也。又《大品》雖用無所得,要須識三乘是權、一乘為實,故求佛之心乃得堅固。《法華》雖知一乘為實、三乘為權,要須破有所得心、學無所得觀,方能動出以成佛道也。
問:所隨喜福、能隨喜心云何同異?
答:凡有四句。一所隨喜福劣、能隨喜心勝,如二乘有所得人作福,菩薩無所得心隨喜也。二所隨喜福勝、能隨喜心劣,如諸佛菩薩所作福,有得人隨喜之。三者俱勝,同是無得。四者俱劣,同是有得。若隨喜法華者,則法華唯勝不劣。能隨喜通勝劣,隨人位行深淺而隨喜也。
論同異。
問:隨喜與四等喜、七覺中喜、五受喜、四禪喜何異?
答:四等中喜謂慶前人脫苦得樂,隨喜門通隨一切聖凡所作功德而喜,此義不同,但四等要是定心,今通定散。又四等中喜但據脫苦果故喜,今通隨喜因果也。七覺中喜是無漏,隨喜門通漏無漏;禪支中喜是定心但是喜受,今通也。五受中喜是果報,今是因門。彼是自悅,今是慶他。彼是無記,今是善法也。
問:前人自作福,今隨喜之,有何益耶?
答:《釋論》云「如人賣香,有人買香,復有人在邊亦得聞香。隨喜亦爾,不動身口亦得福也。」
論惑障。
問:隨喜破何等惑?
答:直言隨喜,正破嫉妬。若《法華》明隨喜,亦破嫉妬,又破不信一乘壽量義也。《波若》中隨喜即是波若,此破有所得心也。
六千功德義。
有人言:一切善法不出十善,始自不殺及不邪見。持一不殺戒,以不盜等九事莊嚴之,則一一善皆具十善,十善便成百善。此百善有自行、化他、讚嘆、隨喜,故成四百。將此四百配五種法師,五種法師各有四百,合成二千善。此二千善各有上中下三品,便成六千。但三根用強,故有千二百;三根用弱,故有八百也。評曰:此釋意具五種法師乃具六千耳,一一法師無六千也。而經云若讀誦乃至書寫者,不必要具五師方有六千,能讀能解如說修行亦得六千。但此義難明,未可專釋也。
注經云「始乎十善,一善具十善即成百善。復約自行、化他、歎人、美法即成四百。各有三品,成千二百。眼等三根助道用弱,但得中下二品,故唯八百。意等三根於通化用強,具於三品,故得千二百也。」評曰:注意不必具五法師,則勉前妨也。
有人言:例如百福莊嚴。百福者,就十善之中有行十止十,合成二十。各有五品,如《大經》云下、中、上、上中、上上,故成百善,名為百福。今亦爾,十善為十,約自行化他歎人美法故成四十,約五法師故成二百,行善二百止善亦二百故成四百,止行各有五品故成二千,約三業明之一業二千故成六千。既有六根,應一根各一千,便成六千。但用有強弱,故有千二百及八百耳。有人言:如上〈法師品〉中三事,慈悲心為室、柔和忍辱為衣、諸法空為座,此三事各有二千故成六千。如以慈悲心行十善,一善還以十善莊嚴故成百善,自行化他等四故成四百,約五種法師便成二千。慈悲心既爾,忍辱與空亦然,故成六千。有人言:依《仁王經》明十信菩薩,一一信具十成百,自行化他等四有四百,約五法師成二千,據上慈悲等三事為六千也。
問:何故不六根功德等耶?
答:如前云三根用強、三根用弱,故多少不同。三根用強者,意根為五法師之本故強。舌亦具五法師,由舌故能讀能說。又由他舌故能授之,令得受持書寫,故備五法師矣。
問:眼耳云何強弱?
答:生盲之人不得書讀二事,而能誦說受持乃至得道;生聾之人不可示語,都無五種法師,故耳強眼弱也。
問:身等三根有何功德而得八百?
答:互相資持故餘根得用,即是功德。
問:何位行菩薩得六千功德耶?
答:下云「未得無漏法性身,而有此功德用」,當知是八地以下人也。有人言:十信菩薩有此用也。《法華論》云「是地前人」也。
問:云何名六根淨耶?
答:如文所明,有此勝用故名為淨。又此經明權實二智、真應兩身皆是無礙之法。菩薩悟無礙之法,故今得無礙,故名六根淨也。
問:云何權實、真應無礙?
答:如前說。長為短用、短為長用,長短為非長短用、非長短為長短用。此是如來究竟自在無礙之身,即有究竟自在無方之大用。始行之人分得此悟,故六根自在也。
問:諸部皆云「香到鼻方知」,云何此經言遙聞香耶?
答:有人言道理則到根方知,今假經力則遙聞也。
問:若道理色可見、聲可聞,今假經力則應聞色見聲耶?若色不可聞、聲不可見者,到者不可遙聞、遙者不可到知也。
答:明中色定可見、闇中色不可見者,何故人眼晝則見、夜不見,穴鳥夜見而晝不見乎?若言眼有光故夜能見者,晝何不見耶;又如弱水不昇毛而昇鐵,金剛破餘物而水銀所壞,誰定強弱耶?故知諸法無有定性,隨意而轉;到不到亦然也。又今約事釋者,菩薩分得二智,以實智故知六根六塵空無所有,如《華嚴》中明眼入三昧耳。出正受觀眼無生,無自性說空寂滅無所有。以權智故有六根之用,約權智能知香義,故說鼻遙聞香也。非鼻根能遙聞。餘亦例然也。
論觀音與妙音菩薩同異。
問:觀音、妙音弘經何異?
答:有同有異。同者並以神通應感弘道利人也。又同明菩薩位行門,以菩薩為佛事也。又同就人門說法華也。同是他方大士,來影嚮釋迦,共利物弘道也。所言異者,略明十一義:一者名題不同。妙音但有人名,觀音人法兩舉也。妙音從能受名;觀音能所合目,觀是能觀之智,世音為所觀之境也。又妙音以德益物,觀音用名為佛事。〈妙音品〉不釋妙音之名,〈觀音品〉辨觀音之號也。二者所對人異。說妙音對華德、文殊,說觀音對無盡意、持地也。三者來義有異。妙音東土而來,觀音西方而至。妙音被召而方至臻,觀音不召而來。妙音有來有去,觀音不明來去。妙音則後集,觀音則前來也。四者語默異。妙音則語,謂聖說法;觀音默,謂聖默然。五者動靜異。妙音現神通,謂不動動方便;觀音不現神通,動不動善巧。六者因果異。〈妙音品〉明其往因,說現所得果;觀音但明現德,不說往因。七者略廣異。妙音現身說法則廣,故有六道之身;觀音則略,故無地獄餓鬼之身也。八者有無異。說妙音無挌量,說觀音則有挌量。說妙音無供養,說觀音則有供養。九者利益異。說妙音則利益多,故他方此土得益;說觀音但利益此土。說妙音利益則深,故有得法華三昧及無生忍;說觀音利益則淺,但云發菩提心。十者妙音不明紹尊,觀音敘其補處。十一者不明妙音已成正覺,觀音則是往古如來。
論觀音普門義。就觀音略有二十條義:一者人法一雙、二者本迹一雙、三者三輪一雙、四者名德一雙、五者內外一雙、六者智慧功德一雙、七者智斷一雙、八者顯密一雙、九者慈悲一雙、十者二身一雙、十一者權實一雙、十二者三業一雙、十三明三德、十四者淺深、十五明二德、十六神通示現、十七力無畏、十八四等四攝、十九解行、二十悲慧一雙。所言人法,觀音則弘道利益之人,普門謂所弘利物之法。非法無以成人、非人無以秉法,人法實無前後,但道不孤運弘之由人,故前明人、後辨法也。又此下諸品以菩薩為佛事,故先顯人也。
問:此品何故人法雙題?
答:為下無盡意之二問,先問人、次問法,是故先題人、次題法也。就此人法因緣無礙,指人為法、指法為人,說此人法為開正道,不人不法即是妙法蓮華也。
二者言本迹者,觀音即是法身,以居法身之地觀物根緣也。普門謂應身,法身地照緣故垂應救拔。如《華嚴》云「金翅鳥王上昇虛空,以清淨眼觀大海龍應命盡者,即以兩翅搏水令兩闢而撮取之。菩薩以法身智眼觀法界虛空,見眾生應得度者,以實慧方便二翅搏生死海而度脫之。」如云「非本以無垂迹、非迹無以顯本,本迹雖殊,不思議一。」因此本迹為開不本不迹正法蓮華也。
次辨三輪者,觀音謂他心輪,觀察法界眾生心可度不可度等。普門即神通輪、說法輪,觀察既竟,或為說法、或為現通,現通生其功德、說法生其智慧,現通滅其苦果、說法生其樂因,現通發其信心、說法生其慧解,亦得互用。又現通多為鈍根、說法多為利根,現通多為在家眾生、說法多為出家眾生,如前說也。
四者名德一雙。觀音謂三種名,普門謂三密德。三名者,一觀世音生眾生口業善、二觀世意生眾生意業善、三觀世身生眾生身業善也。普門三密德者,一知他心普、二說法普、三神通普。三名謂生眾生三善則生善義周也,三密德則應物善盡也。下二問答正明三名三德,攝十方諸佛菩薩名德皆盡,所以受持功德多也。又觀音謂大悲心,普門明大悲事。悲者前則無際、後則無窮,亦無中間。所以前無際者,無始來有眾生則有菩薩悲,故此悲與前際等。後則無邊者,眾生若盡悲心乃息,以眾生不盡故悲心不息也。
問:後際無盡可然。無始來則有眾生者,亦應無始來有觀音耶?
答:眾生無始,今悲此無始,故無始有悲也。《淨名》云「從癡有愛則我病生」,所以悲心拔癡愛。既其無始,悲心亦無始,故無始亦有悲也。普門謂悲事者,雖有悲心若無悲事則是假相悲,以無實益故非實悲也。今悲心既通、悲事亦普,遍拔三世十方之苦,悲事普也。又題名釋名一雙,觀世音者謂標菩薩名并歎菩薩名用,謂眾生起於三業免脫眾難。普門者則是釋免難,菩薩所以能拔難者,良由有三普故也。
問:云何用三普耶?
答:眾生三業興感,菩薩於一一業中隨用三輪,或應通或說法等也。
五者內外一雙。觀世音謂菩薩內德,潛眸密照即知病識藥。普門謂菩薩外德,種種方便充滿十方,救度眾生應病授藥也。
六者智慧功德一雙者,觀世音即是智慧,謂知根欲性。普門即是功德,救度眾生也。
七者智斷一雙。觀音即是菩薩智慧,謂之智德;普門即是斷德。《大經》云「隨所調伏眾生之處名為解脫」。今亦爾,遍度眾生令一切解脫,乃是斷德。不如二乘之人,自無煩惱名為解脫也。
八者顯密一雙。初問答釋觀音名,明顯感密應。顯感者,謂眾生三業興感;密應者,觀音不現身、不說法而令得解脫也。普門即是密感顯應。顯應,觀察其心現身說法;密感者,不明眾生三業興感,但有應以言,謂根緣真發,故即為現身說法也。然顯密感應具通四句,可以意知也。初章明密應,後章明顯應,應章雖多不出顯密。今經正明感應,故四句之中但明期二也。非但此品明期義,乃總攝一切眾經應感義也。
九者慈悲一雙。觀音即是大悲,謂拔七難三毒等苦,令其得脫。普門即是大慈,說法現身令其得果。
十者二身一雙。觀音是藥樹王身,根莖枝葉華菓皆能愈病。普門謂如意珠王身,能與一切樂。二身義出《十地論》,釋文「無心能滅物苦,如藥樹王;無心而與物樂,如意珠王」也。
十一者謂二智一雙。觀音即是實智,普門即從實智起方便智益物也。
十二者三業。觀音謂菩薩意業,普門謂身業口業。
十三者三德。觀音謂波若德,以觀察即是智慧,智慧名為波若。普門謂現一切身,即是法身,為調伏一切眾生令得解脫,即是解脫也。
十四者二益一雙。觀音謂眾生與世間樂、拔世間苦,故有七難及無男女難等,即是世間獲益。普門現一切身說一切法令其得度,即是出世間益也。
十五者釋二德。觀音即是明菩薩字義門,普門即是實德門。字義門者,《釋論》云「菩薩字有無量義」。今釋觀音字有無量功德義,故是字義門。普門明三密實德,故是實德門也。
十六者神通示現。觀音六通中他心、宿命、天眼、天耳。普門者謂如意通、漏盡通。漏盡通即是說法也。觀音名雖攝四通,而文正主天耳通也。示現者,可具二句:一者神通非示現,謂天眼、天耳、宿命也。二者亦示現亦神通,謂他心、如意及漏盡。故六通中三是示現、三非示現。所以《大品》云「三事示現」,下文即云「普門示現」。今普門即是三事示現。觀音既是天耳,故不名示現。即是示現不示現一雙。
十七者觀音是十力,十力是內照故。普門謂四無畏,四無畏外用故也。
十八者觀音即是四等,謂慈心欲與樂、悲心欲拔苦、喜心慶脫苦得樂、捨心修於平等。普門即是四攝攝取眾生,應以布施攝者即以布施攝之,餘亦如是也。
十九即是解行一雙。觀音謂智慧,智慧解也。普門救度,救度謂行也。
二十者悲慧一雙。《華嚴》云「觀音說大悲經光明之行。」悲者欲救也,光明之行是智慧,能救也。世間父母見子受苦欲救,而無智,不能救拔。世醫有智慧能救,無悲心故不欲救。菩薩有悲故欲救,有智慧故能拔也。又始行菩薩欲救,而無道力故不能救,二乘有道力能救,無悲故不欲拔也。觀音悲慧合行,悲故欲救,智慧故能拔也。
次論觀音名。觀音可具二義:一者智境合題、二者應感雙舉。觀謂能觀之智,世音即所觀之境,故名境智也。觀即是觀察赴應,世音即是眾生機感,故名應感也。
問:境智為名,具幾智耶?
答:正是實方便智耳。知世間音聲即不有,有不聞聞義。既了世間音不有有,即知有不有;若識不聞聞,即知聞不聞。以識不有有、不聞聞義,名為實方便。若知有不有,名為方便實。不有有豈是有?有不有豈是不有?故非有亦非不有,非實非方便,名為中道觀。故觀音之名具三觀,世諦觀、真諦觀、非真俗中道觀也。
問:今文但言觀世音耳,何處有三觀?
答:《觀音受記經》出觀音所解,具三觀音也。又論云因緣所生法,即是空、即是中道者,明世間音聲即是因緣、即空、即中道,故具得三觀也。所言世音者,世有三種:一者眾生世間、二者五陰世間、三者國土世間。眾生世間者,謂之五陰、十二入、十八界眾法中生,故云眾生。五陰世間,謂能成眾生之法,即是色之與心。三國土世間,即是色法為體,謂國土風俗。今菩薩正觀眾生世間,但五陰能成眾生,國土是眾生所託不得相離,故總名世間也。世音者,世間語通,音是世間中之別。子夏《毛詩.序》云「以聲成文謂之音」。尋大小經論明音與聲不異,《雜心.界品》云「聲有三種:一因受四大聲,謂有情物聲。二因不受四大聲,謂外物如鐘鈴等聲。三因俱聲,如人吹管等聲。」此則但解聲不明音,故知音與聲不異也。《成實論》云「如人欲聽鐘鈴等聲,則以耳就鈴。」此品云「即時觀其音聲」,〈化城品〉云「迦陵頻伽聲」,如是等皆明音不異聲。普者,上明觀其聲未必周普,故今明普門。普以周普為義,但普有二種:一心普、二事普。凡夫二乘俱無二普,始行菩薩心雖周普而事不普,觀音心事俱普,大悲欲普拔眾眾苦、大慈欲普與物樂,謂心普也;外現一切身、說一切聲,謂事普也。門者,以心事二普為法門,故云門。又令眾生悟入能通正道,故名為門。
問:觀世音有幾名?
答:古經云「光世音」,今云「觀世音」也。未詳方言,故為此號耳。若欲釋者,光猶是智慧,如《大經》云「光明者即是智慧,智慧即是觀」也。又菩薩智慧光明照於世間,故云光也。《華嚴》云「觀音菩薩說《大悲經》光明之行」,大悲即是功德,光明謂智慧。則知光世音不失此意也。羅什注《淨名經》明有三名:觀世音、觀世意、觀世身。什今所以作此釋者,見〈普門品〉具釋三名,故有三號耳。
問:何故立三名耶?
答:立此三名則遍察眾生事盡。眾生唯有三業,菩薩具觀其三業,故立三名也。又隨眾生好樂不同。又眾生或口不能言、或身不能禮,故具說三名。又眾生忌諱不同,故備三名。
問:何故具觀三業?
答:欲遍生三業善故。若口稱名乃至身禮拜者,皆為觀音所照,必得脫苦也。
問:眾生三業興感,三業具幾業耶?
答:口業稱名具三業,發聲即口業、動舌即身業、經意則意業。身禮拜,但身、意二業。意存念,唯意業也。
問:菩薩觀者,但意業能觀,身口二業亦能觀耶?
答:菩薩三業無礙,皆能觀也。
問:觀是智慧,意地可能觀耳。身口云何能觀耶?
答:阿脩羅琴無心尚能應物出聲,天寶無情隨諸天意而走使,況菩薩身口光明不能觀物耶?
問:既有三名,何故今但稱觀世音?
答:此越舉一名也。二者眾生稱名具動三業,今欲遍生三業善,故偏名觀音也。三者娑婆以音聲為佛事。四稱名得自行化他,餘但自行。五者稱名便易,若遭難之時身禮意念為難。六者直稱名尚脫苦,何況意念、身禮拜耶。如妙藥,但得聞能治病,況意念身觸耶。七者《弘猛海惠經》明觀音過去世值空王觀世音佛發願:願未來名觀世音。餘二名無有願也。則觀音名有二:一行、二願。行者觀名救苦,願者過去發願也。
論脫難不脫難。
問:稱菩薩名,何故有脫苦不脫苦耶?
答:至心則脫,不至心故不脫。
問:菩薩自應救之,何須至心?
答:以至心故則罪滅,菩薩方得應之耳,故須至心。二者罪輕則脫苦,罪重則不脫苦。三者習因有厚薄,薄者脫苦,厚者不脫苦。四者業有定不定,定者不脫,不定者脫。問:不定者可稱名,定者應不用稱名。答:今雖無益,作後世因也。五者有密益顯益,則脫苦者謂顯益,則不脫者謂密益。六者有利益者脫苦,無利益者不令脫也。
問:稱觀世音,復有以神力殺害眾生以不?
答:如前明,以利益為定,餘悉不定。若爾者,或令脫火、或令不脫、或故燒殺之也。今稱名而不脫死苦者,此事難知也。

寶塔品密開本迹義
二種次第義釋妙莊嚴等品

CBETA Code: T1720

© AI 帮你读佛经 - 如是我闻

This document is for personal learning only. Do not use for commercial purposes.

Visit rushiwowen.co

Copyright: Original texts from CBETA
AI translation for reference only — not authoritative, not a statement of final truth. Awakening of the Dharma requires personal practice.