DonateZen HallLibrary
Skip to main content
  1. Lotus Sutra Commentary (法華經義記)
  2. Volume 1 (第一)
  3. Preface to the Commentary on the Meaning of the Lotus Sutra (法華經義疏序)
←&→
Use ← → arrow keys to turn pages

Lotus Sutra Commentary (法華經義記)


法華經義疏序

Preface to the Commentary on the Lotus Sutra

欽惟我朝肇自八聰王子,而聖君賢臣靡不世遵,崇於西方慈仁之教。梵容紺字眩耀于方輿,圜顱畦服棲止于林藪,貝葉琅函綫華琪軸,藏諸名山、充溢于輪棟,三寶備著既舊矣。予忝預僧數,自少遍歷禪叢、染指教海,都以南京以北,久遊諸家之講壇。每覽朽簡逸編於蠧魚之遺,雖暑之流金、寒之折膠,孳孳焉謄摹之,遂致蔚然填篋稇載而旋,蓋傚慧布得之勤耳。飯塢靈講主,學富才邁、倫輩罕及,頃闡暢《法華文句》于台麓,仍日抉剔開顯權實立陰觀妄,蛣蜣性惡即具三千之妙髓,俾聽者想味於甘露醍醐。講演之暇,適顧余曰:「昔者姚秦什公親翻《妙經》於震旦,上足僧融創開九轍,叡、生等林立諸曹相繼而有著作。在齊之時,劉虬居士共十名僧務,捃輿師之異言,撰為《注法華》。逮乎梁初光宅法師,師受中興,獨為雄匠,嘗講《法華》,屢感天雨華之徵,又謂燈明佛之所曾誦茲典。方策所詳,不亦誣矣。第恨其所注《疏記》厄之當時,漫弗復存。唐宋而降,豐聞碩學皆不及睹,而幸獨此方存焉。敢請以其所褚刊行于世,克壽其傳,庶幾使後乎千百世之人,賴之遡乎千百世之上,若同堂接膝而相摩軋。此豈細故也哉!」予欣然歎曰:「韙哉主言!夫天台之道,迨至荊溪克任荷負,尤加光顯。竊閱其箋釋於玄文,台家宗體一翕一張,靡不昂然精覈震發。然至析丹丘㪺酌於光宅,鋤剗乎玄論之意,令人嘅焉不能無議。蓋不窺二書故也。其嘉祥《玄論》已行于世,此疏尚未及翻刻,予亦甚歉于衷。以誼不忍辭,丞欲鏤梓以公同好。」

I humbly reflect that our dynasty traces its origins to the Eight Wise Princes, and from sage rulers to virtuous ministers, none have failed to uphold and revere the compassionate teachings of the Western Pure Land. The majestic images of Buddhas and the azure-roofed temples shine brightly across the land, while monks with shaven heads and humble robes dwell in forests and mountains. The scriptures, written on palm leaves and stored in precious cases, are enshrined in famous mountains and fill the halls of monasteries. The Three Jewels have long been established and revered.

As one who has joined the monastic community, I have, since youth, traveled extensively among Chan monasteries and dipped into the vast ocean of teachings, mostly in the regions north of Nanjing, long wandering among various lecture halls. Whenever I came across ancient, scattered texts left behind by bookworms, whether in the scorching heat of summer or the bone-chilling cold of winter, I diligently copied them, gradually filling boxes and baskets to bring back—much like the diligence of Huibu in acquiring scriptures.

Master Fanwu Ling, a lecturer of profound learning and rare talent, unmatched among his peers, recently expounded the *Fahua Wenju* at Taimu Mountain. Day after day, he elucidated the distinctions between expedient and ultimate truths, examined the shadows of delusion, and revealed how even the lowly dung beetle inherently possesses the wondrous essence of the three thousand realms, allowing listeners to savor the nectar of the Dharma like sweet dew and clarified butter.

During a break in his lectures, he turned to me and said, "In the past, during the Yao Qin era, Master Kumarajiva personally translated the *Wonderful Sutra* in the land of China. His foremost disciple, Seng Rong, pioneered the nine tracks of interpretation, and masters like Rui and Sheng, along with others, successively composed commentaries. During the Qi dynasty, the layman Liu Qiu, together with ten renowned monks, gathered the divergent interpretations of various teachers and compiled the *Annotations on the Lotus Sutra*. By the early Liang dynasty, Master Guangzhai, inheriting the revival of the teachings, stood as a masterful craftsman. He often lectured on the *Lotus Sutra*, repeatedly experiencing miraculous signs such as flowers raining from the heavens. He also claimed that the Buddha Dipamkara had once recited this very scripture. While the records are detailed, are they not also embellished? Yet it is regrettable that his annotated *Commentary and Notes* were lost to the times and have long since vanished. From the Tang and Song dynasties onward, even the most learned scholars have been unable to see it. Fortunately, this text alone survives in our land. I dare to request that we print and circulate it, ensuring its transmission for generations to come. This way, people thousands of years from now may rely on it to connect with those from thousands of years past, as if sitting together, knee to knee, engaging in discussion. Is this not a matter of great importance?"

I replied with joy and admiration, "How wise are your words, Master! The teachings of the Tiantai school were carried forward and brilliantly illuminated by Master Jingxi. In studying his annotations on the profound texts, I see how the essence of the Tiantai tradition expands and contracts with clarity and precision, resonating powerfully. However, when it comes to analyzing the interpretations of Guangzhai or critiquing the ideas in the *Profound Treatise*, one cannot help but feel a sense of regret and disagreement. This is likely because these two works were not fully examined. While Jiazang’s *Profound Treatise* is already circulating in the world, this commentary has yet to be reprinted, which has long troubled me. Out of duty and friendship, I cannot refuse. I am eager to have it carved onto printing blocks to share with fellow seekers of the Dharma."

或謂:「古之消釋此經,南二而北七,各以長相當,莫之適從矣。惟我天台,奏師子絃、投師子乳,其說超絕,宜廢古今。猶若龍燭之於螢爝,照曜雖多隱而弗見。嘗謂的傾光宅,餘則自潰。以此觀之,區區亡編之傳,足以彌縫,何闕耶?」予曰:「子之言也,噫!知天台之非不高,而不知光宅之非不深,莫認荊山之璞,奚覩赤水之珠,雖諭斤運之巧妙,而不喻堊質之尤難也。況聖慈純化,或貶或褒、或搥或砧,總在成於器、不在乎迹。不師其迹,善學下慧者也。若徒有優於迹而弱於實,錮諸古而牖於今,猶迂轍以即塗、膠舟而求濟。此非特疏乎光宅,寔亦不肖于天台者也。且又近代叨襲翏翏苟簡之弊,援以屑屑臆鑿之見,而日趨非、日趨虛,言如近而彌遠,理似邃而愈淺。嗚呼!際之末運,盡力其間而不相逮者,其能莫愧于斯哉。此予所以僣升篇首,數思砭今而復古也。」不以人廢言,則予可無慮矣夫!予可無慮矣夫!

Some say: "In ancient times, interpretations of this scripture varied—two in the south and seven in the north, each with its own strengths, leaving people unsure which to follow. Only our Tiantai school, like striking the lion's strings and pouring lion's milk, offers a teaching so transcendent that it should render all past and present interpretations obsolete. It is like comparing a dragon's torch to a firefly's glow—though many lights may shine, they remain hidden and unseen. It has been said that when the true light is revealed, all others naturally fade. From this perspective, even a lost and fragmented transmission is enough to mend what is lacking—what deficiency could there be?"

I reply: "Your words, alas! You recognize the loftiness of Tiantai but fail to see the depth of Guangzhai. Without recognizing the uncut jade of Jing Mountain, how can one behold the pearl of Red River? Though one may speak of the skill of the axe, they do not understand the difficulty of carving the raw stone. Moreover, the compassionate guidance of the sages—whether through criticism or praise, hammering or anvil—always aims to shape the vessel, not merely to follow the traces. Not clinging to the traces is the mark of one who learns wisdom with humility. If one only excels in form but is weak in substance, bound to the past yet closed to the present, it is like taking a detour to reach the road or sealing a boat while seeking to cross the river. This not only misses the point of Guangzhai but also fails to honor Tiantai.

Furthermore, in recent times, there is a growing tendency toward careless simplification and reliance on narrow, speculative views. Day by day, we drift further from truth and deeper into emptiness. Words seem close yet grow distant; principles appear profound but become shallow. Alas! In this declining age, those who strive within these confines yet fall short—how can they not feel ashamed? This is why I dare to place these words at the beginning, repeatedly reflecting on how to remedy the present and restore the past."

If we do not dismiss words based on the speaker, then I need not worry. Indeed, I need not worry!

旹

At that time,

元祿歲在丙子孟春日浪華後學𤀹鳳潭槃談謹敘

Written in the spring of the first month, in the year of Bingzi, during the Yuanlu era, by the late student of Naniwa, Fengtan Pantan, with reverence.

法華義記卷第一

Commentary on the Meaning of the Lotus Sutra, Volume 1

光宅寺沙門 雲法師撰

Written by Dharma Master Yun of Guangzhai Temple


序分

CBETA Code: T1715

© AI 帮你读佛经 - 如是我闻

This document is for personal learning only. Do not use for commercial purposes.

Visit rushiwowen.co

Copyright: Original texts from CBETA
AI translation for reference only — not authoritative, not a statement of final truth. Awakening of the Dharma requires personal practice.