---
title: "靈峰蕅益大師宗論 · 偶書二則"
description: "靈峰蕅益大師宗論是明末高僧智旭的著作。明末佛教面臨內部僵化與外部挑戰，智旭大師立足天台宗，主張禪教律淨融合，回應時代弊病。該書匯集其書信、註疏與開示，系統闡述性相融通、淨土為歸的佛學思想，強調解行並進與實踐修行。作為中國佛教史上承先啟後的巨著，它深刻影響了後世漢傳佛教的發展，尤其對淨土宗的推廣貢獻卓著，被尊為淨土宗第九祖的智旭，其思想透過此論成為明清佛教的重要指南。"
url: "https://rushiwowen.co/en/r/cmgn46fpf0npkk104l0we6aou"
---

### 偶書二則

> Two Short Essays

《唯識》以遍破我法二執為宗趣，故借立法為遣情之門。《般若》以會一切法無非妙理為宗趣，故借破執為立理之門。然則《唯識》宜名破相，《般若》宜名立法，而相傳反稱《唯識》為相宗，《般若》為空宗者，謬也。

> The \*Consciousness-Only\* school takes as its core purpose the thorough破除 of attachment to both self and phenomena. Thus, it uses the establishment of principles as a gateway to dispel afflictions. The \*Prajñā\* school, on the other hand, takes as its core purpose the realization that all phenomena are nothing but sublime truth. Thus, it uses the破除 of attachments as a gateway to establish principles. If that is the case, then \*Consciousness-Only\* should rightly be called the school of "破除 characteristics," and \*Prajñā\* should be called the school of "establishing principles." Yet, contrary to this, tradition has mistakenly referred to \*Consciousness-Only\* as the "school of characteristics" and \*Prajñā\* as the "school of emptiness." This is an error.

鳥窠禪師為侍者吹布毛，止是初入信門方便，世多認為極則事，其為白香山拈「諸惡莫作，眾善奉行」二語，正是徹骨徹髓，原始要終法門，世多認為淺近事。無怪乎解行分張，不達實相正印。

> Master Niaoke, in teaching his attendant by blowing on a piece of cloth fiber, only made a skillful means to help him enter the gate of faith. Many people in the world, however, take it as the ultimate truth. As for what he taught Bai Juyi—"Do no evil, practice all good"—these two phrases are the very marrow of the teaching, the way that extends from the beginning to the end. Yet people in the world consider them shallow and trivial. No wonder understanding and practice become separated, never reaching the true seal of ultimate reality.