No. 279-A首楞嚴經通議序
Preface to the Comprehensive Commentary on the Śūraṅgama Sūtra
《首楞嚴經》者,諸佛如來大總持門祕密心印,統攝一大藏教五時三乘,聖凡真妄、迷悟因果攝法無遺,修證邪正之階差、輪迴顛倒之情狀,了然目前如觀掌果;可謂澈一心之源、該萬法之致,無尚此經之廣大悉備者,如來以一大事因緣出現世間,捨此別無開導矣!故判教者局於一時一教,豈非管窺蠡測哉?自入中土,解者凡十餘家,如會解之外,近世緇白各出手眼而弘通者非一,崇尚已極,刻意已深,而披文釋義靡不參詳精確,發無餘蘊,又何俟其蛇足哉?但歷覽諸說有所未愜者,獨理觀未見會通,故言句雖明而大旨未暢,是於學者未免摸象之歎!余昔居五臺冰雪中參究向上,以此經印證,堅凝正心以照矚之,豁然有得;及至東海枯坐三年,偶閱此經,一夕於海湛空澄雪月光交之際恍然大悟,忽身心世界當下平沈如空華影落;是夜秉燭述懸鏡一卷,乃依一心三觀融會一經,謂迷悟不出一心,究竟不離三觀,以提大綱;但以理觀為主於文則略,如華嚴法界之設,意在得義而言可忘也!說者又以文字為障,不能融入觀心猶心為缺;故予久有議蘊藉胷中,及投災荒,雖波流瘴海而一念不忘者二十餘年,至萬歷甲寅以投老南嶽,寓靈湖之萬聖蘭若,結夏時,粵門人超逸侍予最久,甘苦疾病患難靡不同之,予感其精誠,因入室請益懸鏡,觸發先心遂直筆成帙,較懸鏡雖多,無非廣發一心三觀之旨,而文不暇詳釋。題曰通議,蓋取春秋經世先王之法,議而不辨之意,所謂議其條貫而通其大綱,是於向上一路實以為贅,其於初機之士,可以飲海一滴而吞百川之味也!或曰:佛不思議法可得而議之耶?曰:不然!法本離言,而堅執邪見者非言不破,佛說優波提舍名為論議,以折邪慢之幢。良以此經摧九界之邪鋒、拆聖凡之執壘,靡不畢見於廣長舌端,種種堅壁一鏃而破之,直使智竭情枯降心歸順而後已!以經盡發其情,苟不議明正令,無由以淨法界之妖氛、彰覺皇之大化,是可以文字目之哉!得意遺言是在金剛正眼!
The *Shurangama Sutra* is the secret seal of the great dhāraṇī gate of all Buddhas and Tathāgatas. It encompasses the entire Tripitaka, the five periods and three vehicles, embracing without omission the true and false, delusion and enlightenment, cause and effect of sages and ordinary beings. The stages of cultivation and deviation, the conditions of samsaric confusion, are all clearly revealed as if observing a fruit in one’s palm. It can be said to penetrate the source of the One Mind and encompass the essence of all dharmas—there is nothing more vast and complete than this sutra. The Tathāgata appeared in this world for the great matter of cause and conditions; apart from this, there is no other means to guide beings. Therefore, those who judge teachings confined to one period or one doctrine—is that not like viewing the sky through a tube or measuring the sea with a shell?
Since its entry into China, there have been over ten commentators. Beyond the collected commentaries, in recent times, monastics and lay practitioners have each offered their insights to propagate it, honoring it to the utmost and delving into it with profound intent. In explaining the text and interpreting its meaning, none have failed to examine it meticulously and precisely, leaving nothing unexpressed. What need is there, then, for superfluous additions? Yet, after reviewing various explanations, what remains unsatisfying is that the principle of contemplation has not been fully integrated. Thus, while the words may be clear, the great intent has not flowed freely—to learners, this inevitably invites sighs of grasping only parts of the elephant!
In the past, while dwelling in the ice and snow of Mount Wutai, I investigated the ultimate truth, using this sutra as verification. With firm and upright mind, I illuminated it—and suddenly gained insight. Later, during three years of solitary sitting by the Eastern Sea, I happened to read this sutra again. One evening, as the sea grew calm, the sky clear, and moonlight mingled with snowlight, I experienced a great awakening. Instantly, body, mind, and the world sank into peace like shadows of empty flowers falling. That night, by candlelight, I composed the *Xuánjìng* in one volume, based on the integration of the One Mind and Three Contemplations throughout the sutra. It teaches that delusion and enlightenment do not go beyond the One Mind, and ultimate truth does not depart from the Three Contemplations—this serves as the guiding framework. However, it focuses mainly on contemplative principle, treating the text briefly, like the establishment of the Dharma-realm in the *Avataṃsaka Sūtra*: the intent is to grasp the meaning, and words can be forgotten.
Some also say that attachment to words becomes an obstacle, preventing integration into contemplative mind—this is still seen as a deficiency. Thus, these reflections have long been stored in my heart. Through years of hardship, wandering through troubled lands and miasmic seas, this single thought remained unforgotten for over two decades. In the Jia Yin year of the Wanli era [1614], as I retired to the southern peaks, residing at the Wansheng Monastery by Linghu Lake, during the summer retreat, my disciple Chaoyi, who had served me longest, shared both joys and hardships, sickness and adversity. Moved by his sincerity, I entered the chamber to offer guidance on the *Xuánjìng*. Touched by earlier insights, I then wrote this volume directly. Compared to the *Xuánjìng*, it is more extensive, yet it merely elaborates the principle of the One Mind and Three Contemplations, without detailed textual analysis.
I have titled it *General Commentary*, drawing from the *Spring and Autumn Annals* tradition of discussing the laws of ancient kings through discourse without argument. It aims to discuss the structure and penetrate the main outline. For the ultimate path, this may indeed seem superfluous; yet for beginners, it may allow them to taste a drop from the ocean and swallow the flavor of a hundred rivers.
Some may ask: “Can the inconceivable Dharma of the Buddha be discussed like this?” I say: Not so! The Dharma is fundamentally beyond words, yet for those clinging stubbornly to wrong views, words are necessary to break their attachments. The Buddha spoke of Upadeśa, called discourse and discussion, to dismantle the banners of arrogant views. Truly, this sutra crushes the spears of wrong views across the nine realms and tears down the fortresses of attachment in sages and ordinary beings—all revealed through the broad, long tongue. Every hardened barrier is pierced with a single arrow, until wisdom exhausts emotion, the mind surrenders, and one returns to accord. Since the sutra fully expresses this truth, if we do not clarify the correct teaching through discussion, how can we purify the chaotic atmosphere of the Dharma-realm and illuminate the great transformation of the Awakened Sovereign? Can this be regarded merely as words? To grasp the meaning and leave words behind—this lies in the Diamond True Eye.
萬歷丁巳端陽日憨山道人德清書於吳門之貝葉齋
Written by the monk Hanshan Deqing at the Beiye Studio in Wumen on the Dragon Boat Festival day in the Ding Si year of the Wanli era.