DonateZen HallLibrary
Skip to main content
  1. Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramit (金剛經註講)
  2. Volume 1 (第一)
  3. The Seventh Chapter: Nothing Attained, Nothing Taught (無得無說分第七)
←&→
Use ← → arrow keys to turn pages

Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramit (金剛經注講)


○無得無說分第七

Neither Attainment nor Teaching, Chapter 7

體空無得,言寂無說,是以謂無得無說分。

Its essence is Empty, with nothing to attain; it is spoken of as still and silent, with nothing to teach. That is why this section is called "Nothing Attained, Nothing Taught."

須菩提!

Subhuti!

佛恐須菩提尚未透徹,故云設此問,呼須菩提曰:我謂不應取法,似無法可得,無法可說。又謂不應取非法,又覺似有法可得,有法可說也。盖我之所說者,真空不空之法耳。

The Buddha was concerned that Subhuti had not yet fully penetrated this, so he put this question to him, calling out to Subhuti: I have said one should not grasp at Dharmas, which might suggest that no Dharma can be attained and no Dharma can be taught. And I have also said one should not grasp at non-Dharmas, which might in turn suggest that a Dharma can be attained and a Dharma can be taught. In truth, what I teach is the Dharma of true Emptiness that is not empty.

於意云何?

What do you think?

於汝之意云何?

What is your opinion on this matter?

如來得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提耶?

Has the Tathagata attained Anuttara-samyak-sambodhi?

以我如來無上菩提之法,果有所求而得之於己耶?

With the unsurpassed Enlightenment Dharma of the Tathāgata—is it something that can be sought and obtained for oneself?

如來有所說法耶?

Did the Tathagata teach any Dharma?

抑以此法諄諄然有所說而教於人耶?

Or is it that you earnestly preach this Dharma in words and teach it to others?

須菩提言:

Subhuti said:

須菩提了悟佛意,乘機而答曰:
如我解佛所說義。
解者,曉也。定者,泥於一處而不通也。如我心中解悟佛所說之義理,不應取法,不應取非法之義。無上菩提之寔性,人人具足。或由布施持戒而成,或因忍辱精進而證,或修禪定智慧而悟。六度萬行,皆可默契。
無有定法。
則知無上正等正之法,此吾本來真空,人人所具足者也。
名阿耨多羅,三藐三菩提。
如來說法,原為聞眾生之迷悟。但眾生之根器有利鈍,學性有淺深,隨機設教,對病用藥。
亦無有定法如來可說。
如來不盡之法,只定無法可名;如來不盡法言,只無定法可說。永曰:佛說一切法,為除一切心,我無一切心,何用一切法?
何以故?
須菩提自徵釋:何以故?無有定法可得,無有定法可說。
如來所說法。
盖如來所說者,無上菩提之法。
皆不可取、不可說,非法、非非法。所以者何?
可以性修,而不可以色相取,徒取則何以深造於性理之妙,故云不可取也。可以心傳,而不可以口舌說,徒說則何以超出於意言之表,故云不可說。須菩提所以辨論兩者皆不可也。但可取可說固不,可取不可說亦不可。若執著可取可說,是必住於取住於說,反成邪見。且是法為開悟眾生而設,非有真寔之法,故云非法。若謂不可取不可說,是住於無可取無可說,即成斷滅。然又須假此以開悟眾生,如離筏渡河,則有沈溺之害,又不可仝謂之非法,故云非是非法也。非法非非法,即是如來所說不應取法,不應取非法也。所以者何,是須菩提釋非法釋非非法之義。
一切賢聖皆以無為法而有差(音雌)別。
盖謂法本不無,莫作有見。法本不有,莫作無見。作有則執法,作無則執空。不執法執空,則了悟我法雙空,即曰無為。無為者,自然覺性,無假人為。以者,用也。一切賢聖,皆用此無為之法。然法本無為,悟有淺深。悟得淺者,則為賢人。悟得深者,則為聖人。是無為之法則一,因有淺深,為賢為聖,而差別之不一也。佛說不應取法,不應取非法。須菩提總結出一無為之法,真了悟透徹佛所說之義也。此無為者,即是無上菩提,即是涅槃,即是如來,即是無相,即是無住,即是這金剛般若波羅蜜也。有為法,世間法也。無為法,出世間法也。後學者要知無為寔無不為,可以超三界,證菩提,可以得無量無邊福德。其功之大效捷誠,莫可思量也。若執著無為,拘泥空寂,勉強造作,則無為而寔有為,反成槁木死灰而無用矣。惟順我至中至正之真性,於日用倫常之間,率性而行,各盡其道。不偏不倚,不即不離,得自然而然之妙道。斯為深悟無為之旨,深契金剛般若之法。

正信希有分第六
依法出生分第八

CBETA Code: X0502

© AI 帮你读佛经 - 如是我闻

This document is for personal learning only. Do not use for commercial purposes.

Visit rushiwowen.co

Copyright: Original texts from CBETA
AI translation for reference only — not authoritative, not a statement of final truth. Awakening of the Dharma requires personal practice.