No. 286-B楞嚴經如說原序
Surangama Sutra Prologue
妙性真如,是謂大佛頂。大定堅固,斯名首楞嚴。始中終所不得異,過現未所不能殊。顧圓通止趣一途,修證必資萬行。所以用果為因,因曰密因。乘因得果,義曰了義。行此乃能成佛,昧此無由結經。然舍利得祕記涅槃,兼緣覺聲聞而畢舉。阿難請最初方便,雖內祕外現而俱遺。葢法華功成而位已極,追談中路所經。楞嚴就學而志無前,豫斷化城之想。結集明眼利根,棄小舉要。陳義不待其終,開經已示其極。括五十五位中,約佛子善超之數語,而圓通之法已見前矣。就二十五聖內,舉目連拘絺之六尊,而圓通之人豈外此乎。古今名宿,分曹竪義,殫力參微。然意義幽深,會者未易。即文辭巧妙,晦者亦多。近三懷法師,辯才無礙,而不註一經。人問其故,曰:不優文辭,安敢註經。若不得已,以文士之筆,代僧家之舌,庶幾相濟。旨哉斯言,幾於無我。夫行文之妙經難解,已如斯矣。況析理之深心要渺,當何似焉。要其大槩,亦略可言。生死之根本有二,緣心最粗,業識為細,豈容一往無分?菩提之途路無多,真心獨露,見性自除,焉得兩存不廢?旋妄而得法忍,所旋者,豈七番所破之心?舍湛而至不搖,所舍者,正八識所邊之際。見見何時?乃如來照生相無明之候;聞聞何法?斯菩薩入見前寂滅之門。從破自、破他、破共、破無因,悟生滅之本無;故曰聞、曰思、曰修、曰如幻,證圓通之不隔。第現業唯行可消,宿愆非呪不敵。既從頂出,即是佛身;立見邪逃,豈關魔號?言思已斷,證悟斯存。等妙前之頓漸,境自分明;乾慧後之淺深,人多混濫。諸天因地不真,何以寄迴心之聖?二乘取途非錯,何以墮邪見之流?即數處之覺迷,關全經之明晦,不揣頑冥,妄希信解,研討五年,棲尋眾典。賀居士中男,慧性辯才,深心閎覽,昔聚白門,演說數過,中來閩署,披剝四旬,辨因果於茲經,析異同於諸教,較如觀果,快若拈華。自謂厥衷所蘊,非緣余筆不宣,亦恐遺亡,勉為疏緝,幾回易稿,始得成書。居士來楚,重事推詳,猥蒙證可,取經中如所如說之語,爰名如說。
The wondrous nature, true reality—this is called the Great Buddha Crown. Great Concentration, firm and unshakable—this is named Shurangama. Beginning, middle, and end cannot differ; past, present, and future cannot alter it. Yet the perfect penetration of the faculties leads to but a single path, while cultivation and realization necessarily rely on ten thousand practices. Therefore, using the fruit as the cause—the cause is called the hidden cause. Riding the cause to attain the fruit—the meaning is called the definitive meaning. Practicing this, one can become a Buddha; being ignorant of this, there is no way to bring the sutra to completion. Yet Shariputra received the secret prediction of nirvana, and pratyekabuddhas and shravakas were all included together. Ananda requested the foremost skillful means, and though inwardly secret and outwardly manifested, both were omitted. This is because the Lotus Sutra's work was accomplished and the position already supreme, so it traced back to what was traversed along the middle way. The Shurangama Sutra, undertaken for study with a will that presses forward without prior attainment, beforehand cuts off the thought of the conjured city. The compilers, clear-eyed and sharp-rooted, discarded the small and raised what is essential. They set forth the meaning without waiting for its conclusion; opening the sutra, they already reveal its ultimate point. Encompassing the fifty-five stages, they drew upon a few phrases about the Buddha-son's excellent transcendence, and the Dharma of perfect penetration is already seen before. Within the twenty-five sages, they cited six venerable ones including Maudgalyayana and Gaushika, and could the people of perfect penetration be outside this? Famous masters ancient and modern have divided into groups to establish meanings, exhausting their strength to investigate the subtle. Yet the meaning is profound and deep, and it is not easy for those who understand it. Even the wording is ingenious, and many are those who find it obscure. Recently, Master Sanhuai, with unobstructed eloquence, did not annotate a single sutra. When people asked why, he said: "My literary skill is not superior—how would I dare annotate sutras?" If compelled, using a scholar's brush in place of a monk's tongue might perhaps complement each other. How true these words are—they come close to non-self! Now, the wondrousness of the running text and the difficulty of understanding the sutra are already like this. How much more so when analyzing the depths of principle and the subtlety of the essential mind! Yet if we summarize the general outline, something can still be said. The root of birth and death has two aspects: the conditioned mind is the coarsest, and the karmic consciousness is the subtlest—how could they be allowed to remain undifferentiated? The path of enlightenment has not many roads: the true mind alone is revealed, and seeing one's nature naturally removes the rest—how could both be preserved without being discarded? Turning away from the false and attaining the patience of non-arising—what is turned away, is it not the mind refuted in the seven examinations? Abandoning the still and reaching the unshakable—what is abandoned is precisely the boundary of the eighth consciousness. When does one see the seeing? It is the moment when the Tathagata illuminates the mark of production, the ignorance of production. What Dharma does one hear in hearing? This is the gate by which the bodhisattva enters the stillness and cessation that is present before one. From refuting self, refuting other, refuting both, and refuting without cause, one realizes the fundamental non-arising of production and cessation; therefore it is called hearing, thinking, cultivating, and being like an illusion—realizing that perfect penetration is not separated. However, present karma can only be dissolved by practice; past transgressions cannot be opposed without a mantra. Since it emerges from the crown, it is the Buddha-body itself; at once the demons flee—how could that depend on the name of a demon? Words and thoughts are already cut off, and realization is thereby preserved. The sudden and gradual before the equivalent and wondrous stages—the stages are naturally clear; the shallow and deep after dry wisdom—people mostly confuse them. The celestial beings' causes are not true—how could they be relied upon for the sages who have turned back their minds? The two vehicles' taking of the path is not wrong—how could they fall into the stream of wrong views? Just these few points of awakening and delusion concern the clarity or obscurity of the whole sutra. Not measuring my stubborn dullness, I vainly hoped for faith and understanding; I studied and investigated for five years, dwelling in and searching the many texts. Upasaka He's second son, with wisdom-nature and eloquence, a deep mind and broad learning, formerly gathered at Baomen and expounded several times; afterward he came to the Fujian office and stripped away for forty days, distinguishing cause and effect in this sutra and analyzing similarities and differences among the teachings—clear as seeing fruit, delightful as twirling a flower. He said that what was contained in his heart could not be proclaimed without my brush, and he also feared it would be lost; he earnestly compiled the commentary, changing drafts several times before the book was completed. The Upasaka came to Chu, and we again reviewed it in detail; humbly receiving his approval, I took the sutra's phrase "as it is, as it is spoken" and therefore named it "As Spoken."
明天啟甲子佛弟子竟陵鍾 惺伯敬撰
Written by Zhong Xing (courtesy name Bojing) of Jingling, a Buddhist disciple, in the jiazi year of the Tianqi reign (1624).