菩提行經卷第四
Bodhicaryavatara, Volume 4
聖龍樹菩薩集頌
Verses of the Noble Nagarjuna Bodhisattva
西天中印度惹爛馱囉國密林寺三藏明教大師賜紫沙門臣天息災奉 詔譯
Translated by Imperial Preceptor Tianxizai, Tripitaka Master of the Secret Forest Temple in Rājagṛha, Western India, under Imperial Edict
菩提心般若波羅蜜多品第七
Chapter 7: Bodhicitta and the Perfection of Wisdom
如來智慧仁, 為一切世間,
令求遠離苦, 是故智慧生。
真如及世間, 今說此二法,
知佛真如故, 說法而智慧。
彼世間凡夫, 見二種相應,
害及勝害等, 乃世相應事。
彼二事見已, 見之乃為智,
智見世間性, 是喻於真如。
此說無去來, 智者無不見,
色等甚分明, 乃世相應事。
不淨而為淨, 智者喻有利,
為知世間故, 是說世間性。
為見於真如, 見以剎那住,
世間行相應, 此行無過失。
知女人不淨, 異世諸害事,
謂佛福虛幻, 使我云何信?
有情若幻境, 云何復生滅?
彼因集和合, 乃得於幻緣。
有情種子生, 云何有真實?
殺彼虛幻人, 無心性等罪。
平等心虛幻, 罪福得生起,
真言力等持, 幻境心無著。
以彼種種幻, 種種因業生,
何有於一人, 得於一切力。
若住於真如, 或住於淨戒,
如是即佛行, 誰云菩提行?
因緣當斷盡, 幻化不可得,
因緣若斷盡, 無生而自得。
若不住疑妄, 幻境而不立,
幻境若彼無, 一切不可得。
如是即真如, 得現於心體,
心如是若分, 虛幻何由見?
心不自見心, 世尊之所說,
如劍刃雖利, 雖利不自斷。
自性由若斯, 復喻如燈光,
破闇然得名, 而不云自照。
又若水精珠, 體本唯清澈,
因青而有青, 影現隨眾色。
非青而現青, 如心而自作,
又如彼燈光, 智者知此說。
智慧此開通, 知者何所說?
雖開而不開, 如人無所覩。
石女義不生, 與此義不二,
亦同無心識, 緣念無所得。
非念而別生, 虛妄念如毒,
謂若因若果, 為法而自說。
有談眼藥方, 見瓶而無藥,
若見聞覺知, 此有而非有。
念斷於苦因, 此實念當念,
念念而無別, 此心當平等。
前塵常惑人, 了之無所有,
如幻而不實, 妄心而自見。
住塵處輪迴, 喻空無所依,
住塵性亦然, 亦無有所得。
若與不善俱, 不善汝所得,
若心有取捨, 施一切如來。
如是用心意, 而有何功德?
幻境一切知, 煩惱云何斷?
於彼幻三毒, 遠離而不作,
知於煩惱心, 彼作而未盡。
於彼得見時, 空有意無力,
煩惱性非盡, 與空而相雜。
至彼無所學, 彼後乃得盡,
彼性而無得, 亦復不能見。
彼性若無住, 云何住此身?
若性而無有, 身住於無性。
是性如去來, 隨現而無著,
劫樹與摩尼, 能如意圓滿。
佛變化亦然, 當為斯行願,
喻法呪林樹, 呪成而枯壞。
毒等雖久害, 彼彼皆消除,
菩薩之修行, 所作諸事業。
菩提行最勝, 佛樹能成就,
以彼平等行, 而住於寂靜。
及作不思議, 供養得何果?
隨彼所行因, 而得於彼果。
供養等真實, 得果而稱實,
云何得法空, 實得解脫法。
不離牟尼道, 當得於菩提,
汝不求大乘, 何法求圓滿?
二乘得成就, 成就非圓滿,
若彼所作因, 怖畏於大乘,
別怖怖非實, 此怖實名怖。
此法要當知, 大乘之所論,
離此為他法, 知彼外道論。
法乃僧根本, 僧知法出離,
心若有著處, 涅槃不可得。
解脫心無著, 煩惱得消滅,
煩惱業消除, 斯由解脫力。
愛取不相緣, 以此無執持,
愛業而羸劣, 是無有癡愛。
受愛得相緣, 此受而有得,
安住有著心, 是得名處處。
若心之不空, 復得名為著,
心性若云空, 如識而無得。
如應正等覺, 所說之妙法,
是義乃大乘, 大乘行平等。
說法之一時, 了一切過患,
一味之平等, 諸佛無不說。
迦葉大尊者, 如言之不知,
彼汝云不覺, 不受當何作?
解脫力若怖, 輪迴得成就,
迷彼苦空事, 而得於此果。
迷空彼若此, 不得謗於法,
此空審觀察, 是故得不疑。
離闇知煩惱, 因法知於空,
欲速一切知, 彼言審觀察。
若物生於苦, 是苦怖得生,
彼苦因空作, 彼何得生怖?
若於彼物怖, 斯即名我所,
如是我無所, 苦怖云何得?
牙齒髮爪甲, 骨肉并血髓,
鼻洟唾膿涎, 脂肪及腸胃,
便痢汗熱風, 九漏并六識,
如是諸法等, 一切皆無我。
說彼智與聲, 聲恒受一切,
若說聲智離, 彼離云何知?
若智之不知, 彼智難知故,
彼智既決定, 乃近於智智。
此智非聲受, 彼聲何以聞?
彼聲近於心, 彼知色如是。
若受於色聲, 而色復何受?
如彼一父子, 思惟無真實。
有情塵所翳, 無父亦無子,
知聲色如是, 亦無於自性。
彼色如是知, 喻樂暫和合,
彼自性如是, 彼一而言有。
餘色咸不實, 此說色下品,
彼一切智心, 煩惱悉清淨。
思惟一覺心, 彼等彼若無,
愛若虛不實, 云何住於見?
無我而無心, 此心喻畫像,
是心智相應, 清淨愚癡破。
如是之自心, 彼作云何作?
彼愚癡無行, 此我而虛作。
有行自出離, 而無惡業果,
破壞業若為, 善果云何得?
此二之行果, 互相破成就,
彼說知不虛, 彼自而無事。
因果定相應, 惡見要不生,
此行而實住, 作受今當說。
過去未來心, 彼我無有生,
此心生我破, 我無復生起。
如芭蕉作柱, 無所能勝任,
我心生亦然, 是得善觀察。
有情若不有, 此行云何為?
彼行今若為, 而為有癡事。
有情何實無, 癡喻其愛事,
若滅於苦惱, 當斷於癡事。
我慢為苦因, 癡是得增長,
彼事心不迴, 觀空為最上。
無足無脛膝, 無腰復無腿,
無臂亦無肩, 無臍無胸背,
無肋兼無脇, 無手亦無鼻,
無項復無頭, 骨鎖等皆爾。
觀此一切身, 不行於一處,
彼行於處處, 何處自安住?
以彼身手等, 一切處皆住,
彼一身如是, 乃至於手等。
無內無外身, 何獨身手等?
手等無分別, 云何彼復有?
彼既無癡身, 寧云意手等?
住已近殊勝, 觀者知人喻。
若彼因和合, 木人此可同,
若了如是相, 彼身同此見。
如是捨足指, 手指亦皆捨,
彼初觀節合, 後見節自離。
此身破已竟, 彼住分別見,
分別見此身, 得喻如虛空。
如是之夢色, 智者何所樂?
設施若無身, 何有男女等?
若喜真得苦, 此者何不解?
觀察此云何, 愛樂深煩惱。
樂者之不實, 如彼無執受,
汝苦復云何? 如彼自無得。
彼有苦微細, 既微而不說,
以彼微細故, 不說令他喜。
因瞋而苦生, 既生而有滅,
若於定有見, 於生自不受。
如是而既知, 如是觀因果,
禪愛或相應, 得生彼疑地。
善根之所利, 皆為於何人?
彼此何和合? 和合而何得?
人喻於虛空, 雖合而無入,
無入而非合, 是無分別行。
不求和合名, 若見而無見,
和合彼不求, 云何名得生?
有物非和合, 如導而先知,
而彼識無相, 不住於和合。
彼觸法如是, 何受而得生?
我今何所為, 而得於苦害?
若不得所受, 苦害而不覺,
此位彼得見, 何愛不遠離?
今見此夢觸, 自心之幻化,
既見彼觸性, 彼受汝亦得。
先世與後世, 念念而無受,
若此觀自身, 受亦無所得。
所受既不實, 彼即知無有,
若此無自身, 云何如是害?
色性之自住, 無根無中間,
無內無外心, 別處亦不得。
身若無異處, 無合無分別,
有情之自性, 寂靜彼無所。
智者若先知, 云何而有著,
智者同智故, 彼生何得著?
是智是後得, 是智云何得?
如是一切法, 雖生而無得。
如是法若無, 是法云何二?
彼餘法若是, 有情皆寂靜。
彼他心有疑, 於自即無有,
彼定彼後有, 此法無彼此。
思惟於自心, 是二互相住,
如得於正住, 一切智者說。
若有諸智者, 獲得於智智,
智者得是智, 彼即是無位。
智者得是智, 有得而無住,
無住即無生, 彼說於涅槃。
若彼之二法, 如是極難住,
若法由於智, 智者何因有?
是智由於知, 知者無所得,
二法互相由, 是有情無性。
無父定無子, 欲子生何得?
有父而有子, 彼二法亦爾。
芽從種子生, 種子得何求?
知從智所生, 彼實何不行?
芽從智種生, 知從智芽有,
若彼知不知, 何得有智智?
一切人因緣, 彼前皆已說,
因果所生起, 等喻如蓮花。
因果何由作, 皆從於過去,
此果云何得? 由過去業力。
世間因自在, 自在彼何說?
如是得後有, 彼彼名何雜?
是事唯不定, 非心非賢聖,
過惡無善報, 彼何得自在?
不見如虛空, 不見自過去,
自在不思議, 此理不應說。
彼主何最上? 彼亦自無定,
善惡各自性, 智者知無邊。
因業有苦樂, 彼說何等作?
先因若不有, 果報誰云得?
云何不作恒? 彼無於別見,
彼作既無別, 何得見彼彼?
若見和合因, 無復云自在,
此和合無主, 彼法乃無主。
彼愛不自愛, 此愛而無作,
所得而由他, 何云自在作?
彼不作過去, 謂若恒不滅,
愛此最上數, 謂世間恒常。
有情塵闇蔽, 住此惡功德,
謂此說最上, 此說世間惡。
一三之自性, 不合而無有,
是德無所有, 彼各各三種。
功德雖無聲, 此聲有還遠,
如衣等無心, 由此生快樂。
色性之亦然, 觀之性無有,
彼等快樂因, 有無若衣等。
此衣等快樂, 此乃性快樂,
彼等之快樂, 不能得久遠。
彼得是微細, 云何彼麁細?
快樂如是實, 思惟何不受?
離麁得微細, 微細不久遠,
一切物亦然, 久遠何不得?
快樂得不麁, 快樂不常定,
彼無有所生, 此說不真實。
彼真實德生, 彼得無欲住,
為食不淨食, 而有於因果。
愛無價之衣, 買覩羅種子,
不愛世間癡, 彼住真如智。
彼智世間有, 云何而不見?
同彼世間量, 若此分明見。
世量而非量, 彼無妄言說,
是故觀真如, 彼空而不生。
知性之不觸, 是性而無執,
彼性實非實, 是故非實性。
是故彼夢覺, 此疑彼無有,
彼性若見有, 乃不實生著。
是故知彼性, 無因即無所,
一切皆無主, 因緣中安住。
由彼無別異, 不住復不去,
於實彼若迷, 返為世間勝。
為從因所生? 為從幻化作?
何來彼何去? 了知而若此?
若此而了知, 乃見彼無性,
云何知假實? 同於影像等。
性若云自有, 是因何所立?
彼若是不有, 彼因故不用。
有無之性相, 因俱胝百千,
彼位云何性? 何得於別性?
彼性無性時, 是性何時得?
無性即無生, 當依彼性行。
性無過去性, 而由性不生,
無有性無性, 喻幻化和合。
一切有無性, 有如是不滅,
此一切世間, 是故不生滅。
知行空不實, 喻夢喻芭蕉,
分別滅不滅, 一切不可得。
性空乃如是, 何得而何受?
不實恒若斯, 彼彼云何得?
何苦何快樂? 何愛何不愛?
彼愛何所愛? 要當知自性。
世間亦可知, 何名為無上?
何人何所親? 何生而何得?
一切喻虛空, 彼此受皆失,
歡喜瞋相對, 因喜或鬪諍。
瞋惱諸邪行, 一切令破壞,
罪惡自愛樂, 是得惡趣名。
死即墮惡趣, 得苦而無悔,
或往來天中, 生生而得樂。
捨於多罪崖, 謂真實如是,
如是真無性, 復互相憎愛。
說彼將來惡, 溺無邊苦海,
色力并壽命, 彼得而唯少。
雖獲於快樂, 而由飢困者,
眠睡災昏迷, 如虛幻和合。
當盡彼虛幻, 若此而難得,
彼學何所作? 何行何斷除?
彼彼諸魔事, 斯為大罪崖,
於彼多正道, 難勝而不行。
復於剎那中, 難得生覺悟,
過去未來苦, 難竭煩惱海。
而於此苦海, 我恨苦求離,
如是此安住, 若自不樂住。
如須臾須臾, 入火而澡浴,
見如是自利, 而受於此苦。
無老死自在, 彼行因如是,
從彼惡法來, 感惡而前死。
苦火熱如是, 我何時得息?
自作於快樂, 福雲生繚繞,
以我何見知, 而說知慧空?
稽首具足知, 稽首福德重。
The wisdom of the Thus-Come One is for all beings in the world, To help them seek escape from suffering, and thus wisdom arises. True reality and the world—these two aspects I now explain; Knowing the Thus-Come One’s true nature, one teaches Dharma with wisdom.
Ordinary beings of the world see two kinds of phenomena: Harm and greater harm, and other worldly interactions. Having seen these two, seeing them is considered wisdom; Wisdom sees the nature of the world—this is a metaphor for true reality.
It is said here that there is no coming or going—the wise see nothing that is not seen; Forms and such are very clear, yet these are worldly interactions. What is impure is taken as pure; the wise see it as a benefit, For the sake of understanding the world, the nature of the world is explained.
To see true reality, one sees that it abides in a single instant; The actions of the world are in accord, and these actions have no fault. Knowing that women are impure, and all other harmful things in the world, One might say, “The Buddha’s merit is an illusion—how can I believe?”
If beings are like an illusory scene, how can they be born and die? Their causes gather and combine, thus creating the conditions for illusion. From the seeds of beings arise, how can there be any reality? If one kills that illusory person, there is no nature of mind or guilt.
With an equal mind and illusion, both guilt and merit arise; Through the power of mantras and meditative focus, the mind is not attached to the illusory scene. Through all kinds of illusions, born from various causes and actions, How can there be one person who attains all powers?
If one dwells in true reality, or dwells in pure precepts, This is the practice of a Buddha—who says it is the practice of enlightenment? Causes and conditions must be cut off completely; illusion cannot be grasped. If causes and conditions are exhausted, non-birth is realized on its own.
If one does not dwell in doubt or delusion, the illusory scene is not established; If the illusory scene does not exist, everything is ungraspable. This is true reality, appearing in the essence of the mind; If the mind’s essence is divided, how can illusion be seen?
The mind cannot see itself—this is what the World-Honored One taught, Like a sword blade, though sharp, cannot cut itself. Its nature is like this—another simile is lamplight: It is named for dispelling darkness, but does not claim to illuminate itself.
Or like a crystal gem, its essence is pure and clear; Because of blue, it appears blue, and its reflection follows all colors. It is not blue but appears blue, just as the mind creates itself; Again, it is like lamplight—the wise know this teaching.
When wisdom is thus opened, what does the knower say? Though opened, it is not opened—like a person who sees nothing. The meaning of a barren woman’s child is no different from this; It is also like having no mind or consciousness—thoughts and concepts gain nothing.
If thoughts do not arise separately, false thoughts are like poison; Whether it is cause or effect, one speaks the Dharma of them. Someone may talk about an eye medicine prescription, but see only the bottle, not the medicine; Similarly, seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing—these exist yet do not exist.
When thoughts cut off the cause of suffering, this is truly the thought that should be thought; Thought after thought without distinction—this mind should be equanimous. Past objects constantly delude people; understand that they have no existence, Like an illusion that is not real—the deluded mind sees them on its own.
Dwelling in objects leads to samsara, like empty space with no support; Dwelling in the nature of objects is the same—also gaining nothing. If one is associated with what is unwholesome, you gain what is unwholesome; If the mind accepts or rejects, offer everything to the Thus-Come One.
Using the mind in this way, what merit is there? If the illusory scene is fully known, how can afflictions be cut off? Toward the illusory three poisons, one stays away and does not act; Knowing the mind of afflictions, but acting without complete cessation.
When seeing them, there is only emptiness—meaning has no power; The nature of afflictions is not exhausted; it mixes with emptiness. When one reaches that which is beyond learning, it is then exhausted; Its nature is ungraspable and also cannot be seen.
If its nature has no abode, how can it abide in this body? If its nature does not exist, the body abides in non-nature. This nature is like coming and going—it appears without attachment; The wish-fulfilling tree and the mani gem can perfectly fulfill one’s wishes.
The Buddha’s transformation is likewise—one should dwell in this practice and vow. It is likened to the forest of Dharma mantra trees, which wither when the mantra is perfected. Though poisons harm for a long time, they are all eliminated; This is the practice of a bodhisattva, accomplishing all kinds of deeds.
The practice of enlightenment is the most supreme; the Buddha-tree can be accomplished. Through this equanimous practice, one dwells in tranquility. If one makes inconceivable offerings, what fruit will be gained? According to the cause of one’s practice, one will gain the corresponding fruit.
If offerings are real, the fruit gained will correspond to their nature. How does one attain the emptiness of phenomena? By truly attaining the Dharma of liberation. Without straying from the Sage’s path, one will attain enlightenment. If you do not seek the Great Vehicle, what dharma do you seek for perfection?
The two vehicles may achieve attainment, but it is not perfection. If one’s actions are motivated by fear of the Great Vehicle, It is a different fear—not real fear, but this fear is truly called fear. This teaching should be known—it is the Great Vehicle’s discourse. Apart from this, it is other dharma—know it as the teaching of heretics.
Dharma is the foundation of the Sangha; the Sangha knows how to escape through Dharma. If the mind has a place of attachment, nirvana cannot be attained. A liberated mind is without attachment; afflictions are thus destroyed. When karmic afflictions are eliminated, it comes from the power of liberation.
Craving and grasping do not condition each other, because of this non-clinging; Craving and karma become weak—this is the absence of deluded craving. Feeling and craving condition each other—this feeling has grasping; Dwelling in the mind that holds onto things, this is called “everywhere.”
If the mind is not empty, it is again called attachment. If the mind’s nature is said to be empty, it is like consciousness—ungraspable. The wonderful Dharma taught by the Thus-Come One, the Perfectly Enlightened One, This meaning is the Great Vehicle—the practice of the Great Vehicle is equanimity.
When the Dharma is spoken for a moment, one understands all faults and troubles. The single taste of equanimity—all Buddhas teach it without exception. The great elder Kashyapa, though he heard these words, did not understand. If you say he did not realize, what can be done if he does not accept?
If one fears the power of liberation, samsara is achieved; Deluded by the suffering and emptiness of things, one gains this fruit. Deluded about emptiness like this, one should not slander the Dharma. Carefully examine this emptiness, and thus one will have no doubt.
Leaving darkness, know afflictions; through the Dharma, know emptiness. If one wishes to know everything quickly, one should carefully examine that teaching. If something arises from suffering, the fear of that suffering arises. That suffering is produced by emptiness—how can fear arise from it?
If one fears something, that is called mine. If thus I have nothing, how can the fear of suffering be obtained? Teeth, hair, nails, bones, flesh, blood, marrow, Snot, saliva, pus, phlegm, fat, and intestines, Excrement, urine, sweat, heat, wind, the nine openings, and the six consciousnesses— All these dharmas have no self.
It is said that wisdom and sound—sound constantly receives everything. If it is said that sound and wisdom are separate, how can that separation be known? If wisdom does not know, that wisdom is difficult to know. Once that wisdom is established, it approaches the wisdom of wisdom.
This wisdom is not received by sound—how then is sound heard? Sound is close to the mind; it thus knows form and such. If one receives form and sound, what is it that receives form? Like that one father and son—thinking about them is not real.
Beings are veiled by objects—there is no father or son. Know sound and form like this—they also have no nature of their own. That form is known like this—like the temporary union of pleasure. Its nature is like this; “that one” is said to exist.
Other forms are all unreal—this is called the inferior nature of form. That mind of all-knowing wisdom is completely purified of afflictions. Think about the single mind of awakening—if those do not exist, If craving is empty and unreal, how can it dwell in views?
No self and no mind—this mind is like a painting. This mind and wisdom correspond—purity breaks delusion. Thus the mind itself—what action does it do? That delusion has no action; “this self” is falsely created.
With action, one finds escape, but there is no result of evil karma. If one destroys karma, how can a wholesome result be attained? The results of these two types of action destroy each other. If it is said that knowing is not false, then that itself has no substance.
Cause and effect certainly correspond; wrong views should not arise. This action dwells truly; the experiencer of karma will now be explained. The past and future mind—that self has no arising; When this mind arises, “self” is broken, and “self” does not arise again.
Like a banana tree used as a pillar—it cannot bear any weight. The arising of my mind is the same—therefore it should be well examined. If beings do not exist, what is this action for? If this action is to be done, it is a matter of delusion.
If beings truly have no existence, delusion is like the case of craving. If suffering is to be ended, one should cut off delusory matters. Arrogance is the cause of suffering; delusion makes it grow. If the mind does not turn away from those matters, contemplating emptiness is supreme.
No feet, no shins or knees, no waist, no thighs, No arms, no shoulders, no navel, no chest or back, No ribs, no flanks, no hands, no nose, No neck, no head—the skeleton and such are all like this.
Observing this entire body, it does not function in any single place. It functions in various places—where does it dwell by itself? With hands and limbs and everything, it dwells in various places. This body is thus, down to the hands and such.
There is no inner or outer body—why speak only of hands and such? If hands and such have no distinction, how can they exist? Since there is no body of delusion, how can there be mind, hands, and such? When one dwells and approaches the supreme, the observer knows the simile of the human.
If causes and conditions combine, it can be likened to a wooden puppet. If one understands such characteristics, the body is seen like this. Thus, give up the toes and fingers—also give up the fingers. First, one observes the joints together; later, one sees the joints separate.
Once this body is broken completely, one dwells in discriminative views. Seeing this body through discrimination, one attains a simile like space. Such dreamlike forms—what joy does the wise take in them? If there is no body to establish, what are “male” and “female”?
If pleasure brings only suffering, why does one not understand this? Observing how this is, attachment brings deep affliction. Pleasure is unreal—like that which has no owner. What about your suffering?—like that which has nothing of its own.
There is subtle suffering there—being subtle, it is not explained. Because it is subtle, it is not spoken of to please others. Suffering arises from anger; once arisen, it ceases. If one has a fixed view of it, one does not accept its arising.
Knowing thus, observing cause and effect like this, If one is attached to the bliss of meditation, one may fall into a state of doubt. The benefit of wholesome roots—for whose sake is it? How do “this” and “that” combine? What is gained through combination?
The metaphor of the human is like empty space—though combined, there is no entry. No entry and no combination—this is non-discriminative practice. Do not seek the name of combination. If there is seeing without seeing, Combination is not sought—how can it be named as arising?
If a thing is not a combination, like a guide who knows beforehand, That consciousness has no characteristic and does not dwell in combination. Touch and dharmas are like this—how can feeling arise? What am I doing now that I obtain harm through suffering?
If feeling is not obtained, harm and suffering are not felt. When this state is seen, what craving is not abandoned? Now see the touch of a dream—the mind’s own magical creation. Having seen the nature of that touch, you also obtain that feeling.
Past lives and future lives—there is no feeling in each moment. If one observes this body thus, feeling is also ungraspable. Since what is felt is not real, one knows there is no existence. If there is no self in this body, how can it be harmed?
The nature of form abides on its own—no root, no middle, No inner or outer mind—it cannot be found elsewhere. If the body has no different place, no combination, no distinction, The nature of beings is peaceful—that has no location.
If the wise person knows beforehand, how can there be attachment? Because the wise are equal in wisdom, how can attachment arise from birth? Is this wisdom something that arises later? How is this wisdom obtained? All dharmas, though arising, have nothing to obtain.
If this dharma does not exist, how can this dharma be two? If those other dharmas exist, then all beings are peaceful. If the other mind has doubt, then regarding oneself, there is none. That meditative state leads to a later state—this dharma has no “this” or “that.”
When one reflects on one’s own mind, these two mutually abide. When one attains correct abiding, thus all the wise ones speak. If there are wise beings who attain the wisdom of wisdom, The wise one attains this wisdom—that is a state beyond position.
When the wise one attains this wisdom, there is attainment but no abiding. No abiding is no birth—this is said to be nirvana. If these two dharmas are extremely difficult to abide in, If a dharma arises from wisdom, by what cause does the wise exist?
This wisdom arises from knowing; the knower has nothing to obtain. The two dharmas depend on each other—beings have no nature. Without a father, there is surely no son. If one desires a son, how can he be born? With a father, there is a son—these two dharmas are also thus.
A sprout arises from a seed—what does the seed seek? Knowing arises from wisdom—why does that real one not function? A sprout arises from the seed of wisdom; knowing arises from the sprout of wisdom. If that knowing does not know, how can the wisdom of wisdom exist?
The causes and conditions of all people—these were explained earlier. Cause and effect arise—compare them to a lotus flower. How are cause and effect created? Both come from the past. How is this effect obtained? Through the power of past karma.
The world’s cause is a sovereign being—what does that sovereign say of himself? If thus there is a future life, how do these various names mix? This matter is only uncertain—it is not mind, nor a sage. Transgressions without wholesome retribution—how can that sovereign be free?
One does not see emptiness, one does not see one’s own past. The sovereign is inconceivable—this reasoning should not be stated. What is that Lord supreme? He himself is also without certainty. Wholesome and unwholesome each have their own nature—the wise know them as limitless.
From karma comes suffering and pleasure—what does that do? If the earlier cause does not exist, who attains the result? Why are things not constant? There is no other view in that. If that action has no distinction, how can one see those various things?
If one sees the cause of combination, there is no longer any sovereign. This combination has no Lord—that dharma has no owner. That craving does not crave itself—this craving is without action. What is obtained comes from another—how can one say the sovereign acts?
That one does not act on the past—it is said to be eternal and imperishable. Consider this—it ranks as the highest—the world is said to be eternal. Beings are blinded by defilements, dwelling in these unwholesome qualities. One calls this the highest—this is the world’s evil.
The nature of the one, three, and so on does not combine and does not exist. These qualities have no existence—each appears in three types. Though qualities have no sound, this sound returns from afar, Like clothes, which have no mind—from them, pleasure arises.
The nature of form is likewise; when observed, its nature is non-existent. The cause of their pleasure—existence or non-existence—is like clothes. The pleasure of clothes—this is pleasure by nature. Their pleasure cannot last for long.
If that is subtle, how is it coarse? If pleasure is so real, why does one not accept it through reflection? Leaving the coarse, one attains the subtle; the subtle does not last long. All things are like this—how can long-lasting pleasure not be attained?
One attains pleasure that is not coarse; pleasure is not constant. That has no arising—this teaching is not true. When that true quality arises, one attains it while dwelling without desire. Yet one eats impure food and creates cause and effect.
One loves a priceless garment, buys a seed of silk-cotton, Does not love the world’s folly, and dwells in the wisdom of true reality. That wisdom exists in the world—why is it not seen? It is the same measure as the world—if seen clearly.
Worldly measure is not true measure—the wise speak without falsehood. Therefore, when contemplating true reality, it is empty and unborn. Knowing that nature is not touched—that nature is without grasping. That nature is not truly real—therefore it is not a real nature.
Therefore, the awakening from that dream—this doubt, that is non-existent. If that nature is seen as existent, then one grasps the unreal and becomes attached. Therefore, know that nature—if there is no cause, there is no location. All things have no owner; they abide in causes and conditions.
Because there, there is no difference, it does not abide nor depart. If one is deluded about the real, one instead becomes supreme in the world. What is it—born from a cause? Or created by magic? Where does it come from? Where does it go? Is it known to be like this?
If one understands thus, one sees that there is no nature. How does one know what is false and what is real? It is like images and reflections. If nature were self-existent, what cause could it be established upon? If it does not exist, that cause is therefore not used.
The characteristics of existence and non-existence—due to millions and hundreds of thousands— At that point, what is the nature? How can another nature be obtained? When nature has no nature, at that time, when is nature obtained? Non-nature is non-birth—one should practice in accordance with that nature.
Nature has no past nature; because nature is unborn, Neither nature nor non-nature exist—like the combination of illusions. All natures of existence and non-existence exist without perishing. Therefore, the entire world is neither born nor does it cease.
Know that practice and emptiness are unreal—like a dream, like a banana tree. When discrimination ceases or does not cease, everything is ungraspable. Emptiness by nature is thus—what is obtained and what is received? The unreal is always like this—how are those various things obtained?
What is suffering? What is pleasure? What is love? What is aversion? What does that craving love? One must know its nature. The world can also be known—what is called “unsurpassed”? What person is dear to whom? What is born and what is attained?
Everything is like space—both “this” and “that” are lost. Joy and anger oppose each other—because of joy, there may be conflict. Anger, affliction, and various wrong actions—all lead to destruction. Sin and evil, self-indulgence—this is called the lower realm.
At death, one falls into the lower realm, suffers without regret, Or one goes back and forth among the gods, gaining pleasure in successive lives. Abandoning the many cliffs of sin, one says this is truly thus. True nature has no nature, yet beings alternately love and hate.
Speaking of future evil, drowning in a boundless ocean of suffering, One gains only a small amount of form, strength, and lifespan. Though one obtains pleasure, one is still hungry and tired, Sleep, drowsiness, disaster, and confusion—like the combination of an illusion.
One should exhaust that illusion—if it is hard to achieve like this, What can that practitioner do? What practice, and what should be cut off? Those various demonic deeds—these are the great cliffs of sin. On the many true paths, it is hard to win and one does not practice.
And in a single moment, it is hard to gain awakening. The suffering of the past and future—it is hard to dry up the ocean of afflictions. In this ocean of suffering, I hate it and seek to escape. Thus, if one dwells here, one does not enjoy dwelling.
Moment by moment, one enters fire to bathe. Seeing such benefit for oneself, one endures this suffering. There is no freedom from aging and death—the practice’s cause is thus. Coming from that evil dharma, one experiences evil and dies early.
The fire of suffering burns like this—when will I find rest? Creating one’s own happiness—clouds of merit arise and swirl. What do I see and know that I speak of wisdom as empty? I bow to knowledge possessed in fullness; I bow to the weight of merit.